I just hope the MTBF exceeds the time required to format one of these.
6TB - big? Pah! Seagate plans to put out 8TB and 10TB MONSTERS
We got all excited about Seagate's latest 6TB drive but, really, we haven't seen anything yet. It has been revealed that the spinning rust company is anticipating 8TB and 10TB drives later this year. This info came out in the company's third quarter results earnings call, where chairman, president and CEO Steve Luczo was …
-
-
Wednesday 30th April 2014 19:04 GMT swissrobin
I think that RAID arrays are going to become a thing of the past; as drive units get bigger and bigger (and perhaps less reliable, perhaps not) you are going to see people migrate off RAID and onto the fancy data redundancy across disparate drives systems. These will cope better with drive failure and huge drive rebuild times because they are designed to do that. At 10TByte in classic RAID you're looking at 1-2 day rebuild times, ignoring whatever bandwidth is lost to the application.
Also I can see a lot more journalling going on rather than overwriting the same old block repeatedly; sort of treating the HDD like a NAND.
Maybe not though ... I'm no storage guru!
-
-
Wednesday 30th April 2014 20:00 GMT Anonymous Coward
Don't care where you come from...
...that's a lot of... backup.
I'm thinking that's enough to see all of my favorite movie franchises, in a single disk. Think Star Trek, Star Wars, The Hobbit, LotR, in full HD glory, without any need to get up and change disks. Add in a lot of matching series...
Or even better, a $Xbox or $PlayStation upgrade, and never have to uninstall a game. That's more than I need today.
But yeah, a RAID array with these suckers will take some time to build / recover. Yikes.
-
Thursday 1st May 2014 10:34 GMT Benno
Re: Don't care where you come from...
Yeah, it is - but where I come from, having the ability to store _hundreds_ of TB of data on a daily basis is normal business.
It's a simple attribute of modern CCTV systems, and a NAS full of 4TB drives for storing non-essential footage 'for a bit longer' would be upgraded to 10TB drives in an instant.
They're a greedy lot, those security types!
-
-
Wednesday 30th April 2014 20:22 GMT Herby
Net cost of saving data...
...seems to approach zero as the density goes up up up. Maybe that is why there are services that offer "free" storage for such things as email.
The problem is (and will always be) how to index the data. Otherwise it is just a pile of #$%@.
The retail price of 1TB of data is <$100, and it wasn't too long ago when 1TB was a pipe dream that occupied acres of space. I can go back 45 years, and I don't want to think about the changes (they have been pretty dramatic!).
So, what is a TB between friends!
-
-
-
-
Thursday 1st May 2014 13:04 GMT Arthur 1
Re: What about 2.5" drives
Given that the last hard drive produced for the 5.25" form factor rolled off the line 16 years ago, was by then already just a curiosity, and had the astounding capacity of 47 GB, I'm genuinely curious about when and where your experience was. Is there really someone still running these relics? And they're still working?
3.5" became enterprise standard about 20-25 years ago, fwiw.
-