No Chrome on Android?
I'm not sure if I'm hip enough to use something with an "Awesome Bar", so I'll stick to my current Android browser, which is suspiciously entitled Chrome Beta, made by some dodgy outfit called Google Inc...
Mozilla has galloped a new version of Firefox for Android out of the gates just ahead of the expected full launch of Chrome on mobes later this week. The open-source firm has had a version of its popular browser on little green phones since 2010, but it hasn't lit many Google-mobe-lovers' fires so far. Chrome has been …
The Firefox14 new user interface is not nearly as useful on a 7" tablet running ICS as the preceding release user interface. It may look prettier but in fact it's ruined usage for me, on a 1.2GHz ARM, dual-core MALI-GPU tablet.
On a tablet the new tab control has been reduced in size, and the tabs have got hard to use close points, compared with the previous user interface that had screen-extensions in the form of slide panels to the left and right of the screen for the tabs and bookmarks etc. which were a good size and excellent to use on a capacitive screen.
The new controls stacked in the top-bar are not as finger friendly on a tablet, although they may be the right size for a phone.
I also doubt that Firefox14 is as good as the stock ICS browser on a tablet. Empirical evidence of trying Facebook video in the stock browser is superb - I used the Intelligence-Squared - Google-Versus debate "Hip-Hop on trial", chaired by Newsnight's Emily Maitlis, so broadcast TV is a familiar standard for judging the quality. Same video in Firefox14 is not quite as good.
Send/ file or participate (if existing) in a bug report voting/ testing of the issues you mention. No arm assembly knowledge needed.
Their gigantic size may fool you but Mozilla Firefox is a pure open source project. A lot of stuff you see in application are results from end user, noob, enterprise, mit professor alike feedback.
And I use it on my phone, but my Android tablet's had Firefox on it for a while. Only one reason: it's got adblock. Early Android Firefox was rubbish, but the latest versions have been pretty good and adblock tipped the balance.
Have to see what this new one's like, but fingers crossed. I do hate them ads.
--------
And I use it on my phone, but my Android tablet's had Firefox on it for a while. Only one reason: it's got adblock. Early Android Firefox was rubbish, but the latest versions have been pretty good and adblock tipped the balance.
Have to see what this new one's like, but fingers crossed. I do hate them ads.
-------
Oh the wonderful irony of someone using adblock on an android device...
I presume you understand why/how it's free?
Yes, I know exactly how it's financed.
The way I look at it is that the only way I've ever clicked a mobile ad is by accident, so adblock stops Google billing advertisers for clicks that are worthless.
The other way I look at it is Android is what there is (unless I buy an iPhone, which I won't). I'd pay to remove ads, but i can't do that so I'll block them until there's an alternative.
The other way I look at it is I don't give a sh*t how it's financed and am completely happy with free-riding off people who haven't worked out how to use adblock yet. Call it a stupidity tax.
I installed Dolphin once. When I tried to use it, though, I was presented with a dialog informing me that in using it I was agreeing to run a "background" task which would do behavioral tracking ala' Phorm.
Don't know if it's still that way but I quit immediately and uninstalled it. Fu** the trackers!
Hmm, let me see.
OS made by a company whose main source of revenue is user data - check
Browser made by a company whose main interest lies in your browsing habits - check
Platform which doesn't work unless you agree to the Google we-will-spy-on-you-but-it's-OK-because-we-use-a-computer-for-it Terms & Conditions by requiring a Google account - check.
Public statements made by said company after the Streetview debacle that they didn't need the WiFi snooping anymore as that was now done by Android - check
Not much fu**ing going on from your side - you've been very cooperative so far..
Statement was generic, not an implication the built-in doesn't do tracking.
I dropped my Android phone for a "feature" phone. Only use the old Android as a FLAC audio player and pocketable ebook reader. via DeaDBeeF and FBReader. (both open-source so no tracking.
Phone turned off? Check.
WiFi turned off? Check.
Keep music & books on SD card? Check
Copy music & epub files from BSD system via SD card? Check.
Do ALL my email & web browsing from a BSD system? Check
Not terribly cooperative I would say.
You remind of me when Richard Stallman claimed he reads all his webpages via wget. Inconveniencing yourself to the n-th degree isn't impressive, it just suggests you pay hundreds of £ for devices for which most of the features go unused.
(You were looking for a kindle btw. You can thanks me later.)
"I presume you understand why/how it's free?"
Well, gosh: Best I start inconveniencing myself right away! I'm sure they'd do the same for me!
I'm an Android user. By definition that makes me neither a MS or Apple user, which means my default position is not bent over the desk begging to be buggered raw by the dictates and whims of multi-million dollar businesses.
"I'm an Android user. By definition that makes me neither a MS or Apple user, which means my default position is not bent over the desk begging to be buggered raw by the dictates and whims of multi-million dollar businesses."
Waiter? I'll have whatever he's drinking! Whatever it is, it clearly dulls the mind, the wits, and divorces you entirely from reality.
(And facts. Like Google being a multi-BILLION dollar business.)
Errm, you know that there are only 3 true alternative browsers on Android that actually aren't just lame skins on the the default browser (like Dolphin, and ICS+ are).
I find it hilarious when people claim that Dolphin and ICS+ are faster than stock, considering they USE stock. The only true browsers on Android that use their own rendering and javascript engines.
Opera Mobile
Firefox
Chrome (Beta)
AC @10:23 GMT
You are correct sir there are only 4 browsers available for Android - stock, Firefox, Opera and Chrome beta. The rest are just fancy shells that use stock webkit to render pages.
It's like saying you don't use IE you use Maxthon.
I hated Android Firefox 10, 11, relcutantly installed 12 and skipped 13 altogether. This is a vast improvement especially in the area of speed. I haven't tried the flash support but it does crash frequently on my stock android 2.2 device.
Crossing fingers for version 15.
Actually that's a good thing. Typing a long & complicated password is a pain in the ass on a mobile and the little stars that mask it make it even worse. At the end of the day who is actually going to see my password on my mobile? I'd pay for a mobile browser that removed the mask from all password text boxes.
"......Other browsers playing "catchup" (apparently not very well) isn't news to us."
IE 7 is the latest browser to try and catch up with Opera on market share (in UK anyway). Every day it gets a bit closer to Opera's market share :P
I bet Microsoft are really proud their old browser is approaching the popularity of Opera.
Says big things when that many people like what you're doing.
Maybe some links to the mobile Firefox? Discussion of the different strains (been running the "Aurora" branch on my Android 4.xx device for a while, for example.
I am not sure what the bone fides of the author are, but she/he/it seems to have phoned this one in from the pub, it's generally light on detail all-round.
(Also, where are the Opera bores in the comments? Come on, chaps, someone mentioned a browser)
Another Android FF release that absolutely refuses to honour my zoom level between pages, is completely incapable of any sort of smart zoom, page fit or even text reflow. And it's been like that in every release so far - they're never going to do anything to improve it.
So I can have the browser adapt pages for most convenient viewing in Dolphin,Opera,android stock - *even* FF on the desktop. But not in this. Doesn't matter how fast it is, how many plugins, it fails at the simplest function of a browser - showing me the fscking page contents on a small screen device.
Firefox Mobile's been my default Android browser for a while now. It hasn't been nearly as fast as the built-in one, and not having Flash is a pain, but the extra functionality and sync with my desktop FF has been bloody useful. Plus, I quite like the fullscreen interface.
These new updates sound like exactly the kick it's been needing. Hope it's not as buggy as other commenters are making out. (Though TBH I had this thing installed on beta 1 - it can't possibly be as bad as that was!)
Perhaps they're a big fan of Awesomenauts?
Just tried the newest Chrome beta (HTC One X) and have to say it is much smoother than anything else. Older versions were a privacy nightmare but they seem to have addressed many of my concerns - you can turn off all the obvious leakiness like pre-fetching, search completion and even specify a non-Google search engine. Unless the new Firefox is a big step up from the previous, I'll stick with Chrome for now.
(though my default assumption is that if Google are making privacy easy to manage, they must have some covert way to subvert it!).
Opera, Firefox, Chrome and Safari are awesome in their own ways.
IE, on the other hand...let's just say that it is a blessing that no Android phone/iPhone/Symbian phone is using IE. And IE10 is still using the crappy Trident layout engine. Worse still, Microsoft wants all other browsers to develop a Metro version, so as to conform to the monstrous Windows 8 UI.
To hell with Microsoft and IE, long live all other browsers.
People using Android, a lot of them use it because there isn't any other choice. People don't trust to google too (yes, average) and thanks to the anarchy in market, several assholes exist on Android market. Nobody (except very technical) knows what the hell is going on with their private data.
Companies, including google are very unresponsive to feedback too.
Now there is this thing which is completely open source, has developers which you can even irc coming to market and this time it performs too. Also it runs on 95% of devices.
So, this is big news, really big for mobile.
Ps: not a fan really, just stating facts via opera mobile on Android.
"The open-source firm has had a version of its popular browser on little green phones since 2010, but it hasn't lit many Google-mobe-lovers' fires so far."
Tried it about six months ago. Loaded at startup (v2.1, checking tasks and permissions) and whacked out around 46Mb memory for itself. Wasn't as slick as the default browser.
I will try again once it is out of beta, especially when NoScript/ABP is ready (as browsing ad-laden sites on EDGE is painful).