Teen hacker suspect Ryan Cleary in the clink for bail breach

Holy wow

Neurotypicality, to grant your terms arguendo, is the human default -- hence 'typical', which I appreciate is intended to carry fewer connotations than 'normal' and its antonym do, but which nonetheless denotes the same thing. It is thus far more reasonable (not to mention far more parsimonious) to surmise that your favorite dead luminaries were neurotypical, than to surmise they were autistic, bipolar, schizophrenic, or what-have-you. I've seen all those claimed on behalf of any number of famous dead people; the disorder of the moment changes, depending on the ideological and subcultural prejudices of the person making the argument, while the nature of the argument itself does not.

"I think it would be a brave person who would put a case forward that as a percentage NeuroTypicals contribute more to society."

No doubt you do. Given that no one, yourself included, has suggested that people with autism-spectrum disorders make up more than about one percent of the population -- and especially given the explosive increase in ASD diagnosis rates over the last, what, decade or two? -- I think bravery really is not required to contend that, outliers disregarded, people who are not on the spectrum have contributed more to society than those who are.

"Contribution to society" is a stupid argument? What do you prefer in place of it? Have you never heard of taxation? Whence do you imagine comes the money for programs like US Social Security's SSI, or whatever the NHS's disability support is called? -- hell, the NHS itself, for that matter?

If you're going to argue that people who generally make a lot of money, and don't as a whole spend nearly so much effort dodging taxes as progressive cant would have us all believe, are a net deficit to society, then you need at least to be willing to entertain the same argument with regard to those whose disabilities render them unable to work and pay taxes at all. Since taxation is, in these degraded times, the primary fashion in which any individual citizen (subject, &c.) contributes to the maintenance of the society which throughout his lifetime maintains him, it is from an economic perspective quite reasonable to argue that the true "drain on society" is, in fact, someone who is unable to take responsibility for his own maintenance, and for whom responsibility must be assumed by society as a whole because that's ultimately safer and healthier for everyone than leaving him to beg in the street.

No doubt you'll disagree with that argument in the strongest terms you have ready to hand -- but you're the one who brought "drain on society" into this at all, which strictly limits my sympathy for your upset when someone snatches the weapon out of your hand and aims it in a direction you weren't expecting.

I can't speak to "[t]he biggest problems Autists [sic] actually have". I wonder whether you can; you seem driven largely by ideology here, more interested in proving that your particular subset of humanity is deserving of special privileges and regard not merited by ordinary, 'neurotypical' humans. I don't imagine you see that as a problem, and frankly if it gets you through the day I don't care if you believe the sky is paisley and rains ice cream every day at noon -- but this ideological bias of yours does absolutely nothing for the coherence of your arguments, which boil down to "Autists yay! Neurotypicals boo!", and that did seem worth pointing out in some detail.

In accordance with the ancient dictum on engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, I'll leave the conversation here. Y'all have fun, now.