back to article DARPA boffins develop unfeasibly light metal fluff-structure

Boffins at California's HRL Laboratories have developed what they claim is the world's lightest material, a nickel structure that is a hundred times lighter than styrofoam. World's lightest material Credit: Dan Little for HRL Laboratories World's lightest material Credit: Dan Little for HRL Laboratories Working with …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. Anomalous Cowturd
    Thumb Up

    A floating Brillo pad?

    Rust free too...

    Want!

  2. James Micallef Silver badge
    Thumb Up

    0.9 milligrams per cubic centimetre - so not also super-strong and flexible, but it also floats

    1. Pet Peeve
      Thumb Up

      It's obviously an open-cell foam, so it would fill with water and still sink. That doesn't make it any less cool though.

      The best thing about that picture is that it shows that they can make the stuff in macroscopic pieces. Carbon nanotubes are great things, but when you can only make tiny tiny ones, it's not as exciting.

      1. Daniel 4

        "It's obviously an open-cell foam, so it would fill with water and still sink. That doesn't make it any less cool though."

        Maybe, maybe not. Water has a fairly high surface tension, and this is a VERY lightweight substance with rather small openings - I suspect that without additional energy to force the water to overcome the obstacle of surface tension, there would be insufficient migration into the cells to cause the structure to sink. Of course, should the water actually penetrate into the structure the same surface tension forces will then encourage further seepage.

        Of course, I'll openly admit that I'm guessing here. :)

        -d

  3. Phil Endecott

    vs. Nature

    I wonder how the properties compare to the dandelion seed head?

  4. TheRealRoland
    Thumb Up

    Wonder how easy it is to handle

    I know, they're envisioning it to be packing material, etc. but is that after another 10 years of tinkering?

    1. Ugotta B. Kiddingme

      I know, they're envisioning it to be packing material

      but will it taste better than the styrofoam packing peanuts?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Nothing could taste as good as styrofoam packing peanut butter, though.

    2. Pet Peeve
      Boffin

      You would think it would be insanely sharp, wouldn't you?

      1. Arrrggghh-otron

        R.E. You would think it would be insanely sharp, wouldn't you?

        Indeed. My concern was if the structures are so small/thin would they break up and cause asbestos like problems if inhaled?

  5. Big Al
    Boffin

    Modern buildings?

    The Eiffel Tower was completed in 1889 and the Golden Gate Bridge in 1937...

    Might be time to step out of the research bunker and look around, fellas...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      You must be from the US of A

      Over here we have buildings many hundreds of years old so in comparison the Eiffel Tower is a modern building..

    2. Havin_it

      And your example of such a modern building, visibly intricate in its architecture and so iconic it's known to pretty much everyone living, is...?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        The Sydney Opera House?

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Fairly modern yes

      Compared to an awful lot of structures still standing around Europe these are still relatively new. America doesn't have that much of a history compared to Europe so they think anything still standing after 50 years is old. Anything over 100 years is ancient.

    4. Naughtyhorse
      Joke

      lol cos the world is only 6000 years old I guess

  6. jubtastic1

    Looks like iit might find a use as exhaust baffle

    Assuming it has some sound absorption and provides thermal insulation, I can see this going into race cans.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      re: I can see this going into race cans

      Only if you want it to clog up with exhaust particles, I think.

  7. Tom Maddox Silver badge
    Go

    Thinking small

    I'm curious about how strong this stuff is. Would it be possible to make airplanes or rockets partially or completely out of it or some analog?

    1. Pooua

      I asked the same question on another forum. On this forum, though, the question is especially pregnant, as these people built and launched a paper space plane. Perhaps, using this material, they will go to Mars?

  8. fearnothing

    Massive energy absorption and high elasticity... I wonder how well this would function as ballistic armour?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      re: ballistic armour

      I was thinking more along the lines of a cycle helmet that's slim, light and cool enough to wear while actually affording a reasonable level of protection (i.e. a lot more than the current standard "should help if you topple over at jogging speed and only hit a smooth flat surface").

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    So when can they make my new phone out of this stuff?

    Light enough to bounce without breaking, and floats?

    Sign me up now :)

  10. Eddy Ito

    Yes but,

    Is it open cell, closed cell or can it be either just depending on how it's made? This will determine just how useful it really is. Also since nickel is a metal many people are sensitive (allergic?) to can it easily be plated?

    1. Pooua

      My understanding is that it could be made of a number of different metals. The researchers just happened to have chosen nickel for this demonstration.

  11. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Somewhat more solid than a politician's election promises then?

  12. Big Al
    Boffin

    @havin_it:

    30 St Mary Axe, known as 'The Gherkin' in London, the triangulated perimeter structure of which makes this 40-storey building sway (wind) resistant without any extra reinforcements - and which despite its overall curved shape, doesn't make extensive use of curved glass except at the cap. Small wonder an international survey of major architectural practices in 2006 rated it the "world's most admired new building".

    But let's face it, space frame construction - which is what the new material's form seems to be most reminiscent of - was arrived at as early as 1900 by Alexander Graham Bell, before being thought up again by Buckminster Fuller in the 1950s... plenty of examples of that around, try Stansted Airport for a well-known example.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      There's a reason it's called the Gherkin

      Cos just like gherkins it's disgusting. It is truely one of the most hideous buildings I have ever seen and every time I am unfortunate enough to have to visit London I can't help but think how out of place it looks and that it ruined Londons skyline.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        You've not seen the Shard yet.

        $deity that thing is ugly.

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    I don't call it the gherkin.

    I've always called it the turd. It looks more like a turd than a gherkin.

    1. BristolBachelor Gold badge

      You only think that because you haven't seen the Asahi building in Tokyo! Look at this and tell me that the girkin looks more like a turd.

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/metarenato/178917120/

  14. JeffyPooh
    Pint

    Eiffel it all the way down...

    The Eiffel Tower is a lattice made of smaller lattices. Brilliant. But m. Eiffel gave up too soon. If the 'lattice made from smaller lattices' concept was followed through in an almost endlessly-recursive manner, then Eiffel Tower would weigh next to nothing. Obviously the recursion has to stop when the technology runs out (nanometer scale these days). Done correctly, the structural strength is retained (if not improved) while the mass tends towards zero.

    The DARPA example is wonderful and fantastic, but it would be infinitely lighter if the solid tubes were made of (10:) lattice structures (GOTO 10) - all the way down.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      re: lighter if the solid tubes were made of ...

      A tube is by definition a /hollow/ cylinder.

  15. Wombling_Free
    Black Helicopters

    C'mon, DARPA made it....

    So it only exists to make killing people quicker and easier (picking the two favourites of the three: quicker, easier, cheaper)

  16. Mips
    Childcatcher

    Sound proofing?

    Don't think so. This requires mass and sound absorption, this material has neither.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      re: Sound proofing?

      Why do you think it won't have good acoustic absorption/diffusion properties, resulting from air pumping around the very fine lattice structure?

  17. 2cent

    Piezo rolls on

    I wonder if a tire with a layer of this stuff interlace Piezoelectric material would be possible with this stuff.

    Distribution of mechanical force through the linking around a tire.

    A nice little side effect might be shock absorption as the energy interlace in the linking moves around the tire.

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like