Re: Dear Dyson
>Henry's are shit<
I would just like to take the time to thank you for your insightful, well considered, thought-provoking and valuable contribution to this discussion.
Brit inventor James Dyson is challenging the EU's labelling policy for hoovers in court, claiming that it doesn't do his vacuum cleaners justice. Dyson said that the EU's energy efficiency rating system was based on dust-free lab conditions that were completely different to the way that hoovers performed in the home. The firm …
Hmmm, speaking as someone who used to try and sell Kirby hoovers (I actually got people to buy *that* overpriced piece of American rubbish!) I can categorically state that Henry hoovers were brilliant.
I never got a sale in a house with a Henry. They were cheap and very good at hoovering.
Dysons, on the other hand, were the most traded in hoover we ever had. We had rooms full of the things. They may look nice in the shop, are very loud (so must be powerful, right?) but they are sh*t at hoovering.
Style over substance.
Andy
+1 for getting a Henry, mine just keeps on going. Bags are cheap online too.
Okay, I did replace the powered head unit because the brush roller broke, but at least you can buy the replacement head units on their own.
There's a reason that offices use these - they work, keep on working, and they're simple.
With my old Dyson I just press a button in the top of the handle and carry the plastic container out to the bin, separate it's two halves over the bin and shake out the dust. The drop it back in place. That's not really a messy job.
I do need to wash the filters every year or so, as it loses suction because a safety valve blows on the side, as I guess it thinks the pipe is block by something, but it's actually the filter that's clogged.
"Just hold in bin, push button, drop all dust goes into bin... tap a few times to ensure its all out, then close and your clean, no bag needed"
We ended up emptying each load from our Dyson (now departed to the council tip) into a carrier bag, as the dust and dog hair would just stick to the sides of the bin, and not end up in the lorry when it was emptied.
My folks bought an early DC02 and had a lot of trouble with it. Cord retraction, power switch and other quite important features failed, which isn't what you want with a "premium" product.
It was replaced with a Henry. About as complicated as a potato, but built to last. In the end it was killed after many years when the motor bearings gave out after being used with a filter that had a hole in after being set on fire (long story).
That henry was replaced with another one...
Had two Dysons, both shit and didn't last that long, they were early models but I got fed up with them not living up tothe hype. That's a lot of plastic in the land-fill.
Now I have a Henry, it's lasted much longer than both Dysons put together and has far more power.
I do agree with his point about fair testing, but lets hope they count the amount of plastic you have to throw away when it packs up too, not to mention the oil needed to ship them in from Malaysia.
make the gosh forsaken things quieter!
never had a dyson, but cannot really imagine they are any different, our current cyclonic rip off style machine that I just replaced for less that $30 online does a good job... the filters, which also clog up like the toilet in a nightclub, cost around the same to replace... disposable life much?!
but my worst complaint is the noise, they all make this god awful racket. We bought a wet dry vac and it is about 1/2 as loud as the upright and has more suck then a $100 pro...well you get the idea...
the wife hates it too even though we have tile floors, she also insists on using the upright out back on the lanai even though we have the wet/dry vac for that reason! (well ok we bought it because our fridge water pipe sprung a leak one day but still)
I would love a nice quiet vacuum cleaner I cannot hear the washing machine at all even spinning surely they can make something that does not sound like it is about to explode***
*** I think I heard a rumour somewhere that they did once experiment with the whole "quiet" thing, and in a survey people thought that thr quiet one was not as powerful as the loud one even though they were the same power and suck... not sure if this is true but would make sense in a weird trick-cyclist explainable way
I dont do hoovering - partly because I'm lazy but mainly at 6'5" there is not a single one on the market tall enough for me to use comfortably and not set of my 'ooh my back I'm off down the pub' problem.
And Dyson can rot in hell for glueing the carpet thing on the end of the pipe so you cant use if and the pull out 'expandable' plastic hose that's as giving as a rally suspension coil.
We have a dyson and it's very meh. Not a great deal of suction and seemingly more noise and bluster than work being done.
I used to have a cyclonic one made by VAX and that was superb. Shame I lost it during a house move :-(
Anyway, he has a point. I wonder if, like the suggestion about bags, we were to add in other environmental issues such as "shipping to the EU" how the figures would look?
Well ours is OK, given to us as the owner found the pipe too short, my wife fixed it by extending it!
Clean blue filter monthly, dismantle cyclone over few years and air blast it clean.
Pretty good, the worst bit is the power heads tend to wear out their brushes and they do not do the brush as a spare.
Been very impressed with the two I've got (long story). Both the ball ones - a small one and a big one. Fantastic suction, really manoeuvrable with the ball, neither has ever gone wrong (oldest is >5 years I think). Easy to empty, one button, no mess. Only problem is they are a bit heavy, and the smaller ones cable is a tiny bit short for our house.
Occasional filter cleans and they are back to top performance. Note, I do not have any pets (except a small fish - does that count?)
Also have a Henry. Fine on hardfloors, as you might expect, but no-where near as good as the Dyson on piled carpets.