And their game was only successful because it was a generic clone of another successful game. A year or so from now, most of their players will have move on to whatever generic game becomes popular next, and the chances of it coming from them are rather slim.
Candy Crush dev stuffs EU 'candy' trademark down gob
The company behind the wildly successful Candy Crush Saga mobile games franchise already has its mitts on the European trademark for the word "candy" and is now awaiting approval for its application for the same thing in the US. "We have trademarked the word 'CANDY' in the EU, as our IP is constantly being infringed and we …
-
-
Wednesday 22nd January 2014 13:58 GMT Avatar of They
Who cares???
It is a game designed around Capcom? or Konami or something similar game Bejeweled and not a very good rip off.
All they did was add the fact you can pay for upgrades or actually pay to progress. And because the world is filled with morons they are actually getting stupid people to pay for it.
Having looked at their sequels, the pet on is the same as an old spectrum game I used to play about coloured bricks in a certain order to clear the screen, in fact I have an old XP game that is the same idea.
The other with witches is identical to a game I have on Linux distro's from way back with penguins.
King.com haven't done an original thing yet. Just a shame too many stupid people pay.
-
Wednesday 22nd January 2014 14:29 GMT T. F. M. Reader
Bathrobes? DVDs?
Does this mean that no one can market candy apple red or candy pink bathrobes anymore? A lot of people, including some famous designers, may object (I just googled for fun).
I assume films with "candy" in the title (or as the first name of someone in the cast) can still be released. Someone tell Robert De Niro et al. to change the title of Candy Store (maybe to Candy Crush as it is a thriller?) before it's too late.
Seriously though, I do realize that one can trademark a word in a particular context related to a recognizable product. But what does the stupid game have to do with bathrobes or DVDs, FFS?
-
Wednesday 22nd January 2014 14:40 GMT Anonymous Coward
Just to confirm...
Here's the European TM registry entry for 'Candy' in the field of software:
http://oami.europa.eu/eSearch/#advanced/trademarks/1/100/n1=MarkVerbalElementText&v1=candy&o1=AND&c1=CONTAINS&n2=GoodsServicesDescription&v2=software&o2=AND&sf=ApplicationNumber&so=asc
King.com and/or Midasplayer (Skills) Limited own 'Candy Crush Saga', 'Candy Crush' and 'Candy' together with some logo versions.
However, remember that TM registration is just that - registration, NOT examination or 'grant'. There is *no* presumption that these TMs are valid, just that they are registered as indicators of trade by the applicants in each case.
It's worth noting that a lot of Candy-game TMs seem to appear with dates that follow Candy Crushes success. - this indicates King.com might have a point, and also underlines the fact that registration does not mean validity...
-
-
Wednesday 22nd January 2014 17:11 GMT Anonymous Coward
Counterclaim
Star Saga 1 released on Apple2 in 1988, and used subsequently in many video game titles. That one's from EA, others from Square Enix. Neither are low rent publishers. Also tempted to complain to the ASA about the misleading use of the word 'Saga' in the C-game. It doesn't appear to have much of a story, unless that's an additional DLC.
-
-
-
Thursday 23rd January 2014 16:26 GMT davefb
what was that game again?
"Candy Casino Slots – Jewels Craze Connect: Big Blast Mania Land"
tbh the only surprise here is that there wasn't the words "Clash" or "Clans" in the name..
oh , gamasutra mentions this..
http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/JasPurewal/20140121/209020/Lets_talk_sense_about_game_trademarks_King_and_Candy_Crush.php
No need for any King.com 'candy' tm. that breaks Apples rules..