back to article DON'T PANIC: No FM Death Date next month, minister confirms

Culture and Comms Minister Ed Vaizey told Parliament last night he won't announce an expiry date next month for a popular technology that everyone uses and loves: FM radio. Vaizey will, however, make a much-anticipated strategy statement, while the larger radio stations had hoped he'd set a firm date for when broadcasters …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

    1. Mark #255

      Re: BTW am I right in thinking UK DAB <> Europe DAB?

      Another point is that here in the UK we use Band III (200 to 230 MHz ish) for DAB transmissions, while over on the continent they also use Band L (1450 to 1480 MHz, Wikipedia assures me).

      Very few UK DAB receivers are able to tune into Band L transmissions.

  1. Roger Stenning
    Trollface

    It just occurred to me...

    ...that DAB actually stands for Dire And Bollocks.

  2. tkioz

    Wow. The UK is getting rid of FM radio? Seriously?

    I could get behind the switch over to digital TV, but FM radio? What's the point? Sure it might be better, but think of all the cars out there with suddenly useless radios. It's not like you can get a set-top box for your car.

    1. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

      "It's not like you can get a set-top box for your car."

      You can. But depending on where you are (ie most places) the DAB signal breaks up before the show ends and you have to switch to something else or go back to FM.

      1. M7S

        Adding kit in cars - actually a bit dodgy

        Many of these things, like satnavs, are suckered to the windscreen. Anything in the "swept area", i.e. that covered by the wipers is an MOT failure, not just at the time of the test (when you can take it off) but anytime that the traffic police officer wants to start writing. It's especially relevant if you've been involved in a bump whether it's your fault or not. Having this sort of thing could make it so in the eyes of the insurers and the courts.

        Yes I know world+dog do it with their sat-navs, that doesn't make it legal and I do see lots of road users with these things positioned right in their line of sight, not realising just how large an object it can block from view. Reaching for the thing to change channel if it's not close could also lead to a charge of failing to be in proper control of your vehicle. We used to have accidents as people changed cassette, that sort of thing might make a comeback.

        I expect also that there might be issues with reception if they are not "visible" to the transmitter through the glass, and also some of the glass in cars such as heating elements, UV filtering etc can affect reception, so its a sort of no-win situation for many potential users.

        And what of non-car vehicles with radios fitted? Radios are becoming more common on motorcycles, and I expect there are other types of users such as boats (both leisure and commercial). How far does DAB go, the trawlermen might need the shipping forecast?

  3. FuzzyTheBear
    Pint

    Try to convince stations that have millions in equipment ,towers transmitters and are amking a living to just let go. Won't happen. FM 88/108 MC penetrates rather well in buildings , got tremendous coverage of at least a hundred miles all around the transmitter and sounds great. Noone can even begin to tell me DAB is better than a tx at a nice low fm frequency to get in contact with car traffic , trucks on the roads etc. Rest assured broadcasters would throw a fit to hear that they are out of business to please another group . Politicians beware , stay out of broadcast radio. You will find the radio set owners , car owners , stereo set owners , personal fm radio owners and quite a few more chaps biting hard. .. in fact expect a mugging and your quick demise. We'll get Simon in as counsel on how best to dispose of the man

  4. SVV

    I think the 50% mark may take decades to reach, if ever

    OK, I don't drive so I don't need it in my car right now, but my home radio listening is all done through my tablet (and powered speakers if I'm in the living room) - magically delivered through the magic of a wi-fi broadband connection.

    So, no need for DAB at all, and the UK only incompatibility problems are hardly likely to increase uptake. Plus ever increasing uptake of 4G and the ensuing decrease in price and increase in "unlimited usage" data plans that are already happening - as we all basically demand wireless internet everywhere - mean that DAB might be something that never really takes off.

    Maybe the Wi-fi standard could even be extended to allow the frequency bands that are currently used for DAB to be used as a kind of nationwide openly accessible broadcast only wi-fi signal?

  5. Fihart

    FM - not so much loved as entrenched.

    Tallying the number of radio units in my home; hifi tuners (4 for some reason), radio/CD player portables (3), MP3 players with FM (4 ?), old phones with FM (6?), Freeview telly with many radio stations not available on FM (1). Add to that internet radio.

    With 20 or so means of listening to the radio already, even the offer of a £40 Sony DAB radio at a car boot sale for £8 just didn't seem that tempting.

    Fact is, I mostly listen to Radio 4 and Radio 5. Any promise of extra stations on DAB is about as exciting as the multitude of, to me, redundant radio channels on Freeview or Freesat .

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: FM - not so much loved as entrenched.

      Well, I've got a DAB radio in my garage. Admittedly not the garage where I'm living at the moment but I have got a DAB radio. Free, when it wasn't needed at work any longer. Work, where it came free with an order for something (stationary?) and wasn't much good inside our metal roofed building.

      But I do have one. Even if it isn't plugged in.

  6. Inventor of the Marmite Laser Silver badge

    If DAB is the answer

    It must have been a fucking stupid question

    1. Piro Silver badge

      Re: If DAB is the answer

      a) what way do people NOT want to listen to the radio.

      b) should we try to get people to landfill perfectly good radios?

      c) shall we render most cars useless, as they have fixed, proprietary head units?

      d) make people listen to garbage audio quality

      e) reduce signal coverage for radio

      f) make radios last for no time at all and consume batteries like old school ghettoblasters

      g) all of the above.

  7. Haku
    Facepalm

    Yes, digital is always better than analogue

    For example, you can't buy music on vinyl anymore...

    1. This post has been deleted by its author

      1. garden-snail
        Trollface

        Re: Yes, digital is always better than analogue

        As a quantum physicist, I must point out that our ears, sound and indeed the Universe itself are all in fact digital when you break it down to the most fundamental level...

        1. TRT Silver badge

          Re: Yes, digital is always better than analogue

          If you do that, you'll find that nothing exists at all, really. It's all just probability.

    2. Nigel 11

      Re: Yes, digital is always better than analogue

      The problem is with the data-compression used by DAB (and compressed MP3 etc), and the fact that the algorithms chosen generate time-varying non-harmonic distortions. Digitisation, as used on CDs and studio-master recorders, doesn't do this to any audible extent.

      Vinyl, valve amplifiers, and carefully constructed nonlinear transistor amplifiers generate harmonic distortion, which colours the music. Some people prefer it that way. I don't prefer it, neither do I detest it. At low levels, without the ability to compare sources with and without low-harmonic distortion, it's impossible to tell whether the tonal colouration was there on the master or not. Draperies etc. in concert halls also colour the music, by removing greater or lesser quantities of harmonics.

      If the only source of broadcast music is DAB, I'll never listen to broadcast music again. What it does to music (even with perfect reception) is simply vile.

  8. jason 7

    You know what.....

    ...I've never had the desire to buy a radio that has a brushed steel effect kitchen cupboard handle glued on top of it.

    Other than how DAB ever got past the basic testing phases all those years ago, I'm still puzzled that this (what 25+ years now?) tech hasn't reached 'given away free with 4 litres of oil' status yet?

  9. Snar

    I can't see the point in clearing Band II of FM - Apart from allowing it to be polluted by junk OFDM in-house PLT or from a cabinet to home g.fast crap.

    The band has no real commercial use in the telecoms market, so why not just leave things alone?

  10. Dieter Haussmann

    Our Audi has DAB and Internet radio, we use the latter due to far more choice of stations, and better reception of Giff Gaff's 3G than DAB. We can also add the channels on myaudi online portal.

  11. Enrico Vanni

    C'mon people. Stop treating this as some sort of conspiracy and see it as the clusterfuck that it is. DAB was a brave effort, but too little too soon, and in a world where standards matter the intentions of the people who brought it to market, noble as they were, should not be criticised. instead, blame the rent seekers who want something for nothing and push an inadequate standard for their own ends (ie. OfCom).

    I can remember when Radio 1 was not on FM at all, and Radio 2 shared its spectrum with Radio 4, so the lack of coverage is not the fault of the technology. DAB could work if it was resourced properly, starting with a switchover to DAB+ (which is no more an issue than when DVB-T digital terrestrial went from 2k to 8k base modulation, rendering many early and unsupported STBs obsolete). Almost all sets sold in the last decade are already dual standard or can be upgraded (although there seems to be an issue with the AAC codec and the licensing of said codec).

    1. druck Silver badge
      Flame

      I remember a little later on when Radio 2 had its own FM channel, but lent it to radio 1 for a couple of hours a week, one of which was on a Sunday morning. I used to wait to return to hear the music in wonderful clear stereo, rather than the dull mono of AM. When I heard that most DAB channels were in low bit rate mono, I swore never to adopt it. Think of the outrage if they switched of colour analogue TV, and digital was only in black and white.

    2. Nigel 11

      It is a conspiracy, in that there are public plans to deny us choice by discontinuing FM broadcasting at an unspecified future date. Until an announcement is made that FM is here to stay, be very afraid for your music broadcasting.

      Once that announcement is made, expect DAB to die out. The only reason it got any market penetration at all, was a lot of people bought a DAB set to try it out on the back of a load of media hype. (This customer hasn't binned his DAB set because it does represent a slight improvement over BBC World Service reception on AM. The other preset buttons remain unset).

  12. Herby

    Might be some wait!

    Funny thing about radio is that it is a WORLD-WIDE standard. Unless other part of the world (like here in the USA) start going with DAB it just won't take off. Radio manufacturers won't care that the UK market wants DAB. There are all sorts of people that like the current FM broadcasts. When 4 channel stereo FM broadcast was being offered (I have intimate contact with the people involved, but not that type of intimate!) the lobby of the blind people that thought they would lose their reading channels (SCA subcarriers) brought it to a screaching halt as the attempts to answer all the form letters stalled the rule making.

    In lots of markets here in the USA, the engineers are waiting to flip the switch to OFF as soon as possible as it just doesn't measure up to FM in its many uses (both fixed AND mobile). My recent experience was driving around in a friends car and noticing the difference in audio quality as we went into a tunnel and the DAB dropped off. It was quite dramatic.

    Almost like digital TV (don't get me started) this looks like a reason to deliver more channels of lesser quality audio to the unsuspecting public.

    All politics, not one bit of good engineering!

  13. Fihart
    Coat

    Wonder if the decision makers have the facts.

    Interesting that a readership of, largely, techies here is so unanimous in their rejection of DAB.

    Presumably we are mostly the sort of people eager to adopt new ideas (if they work)*.

    On this small sample, DAB might as well get its coat.

    * Admittedly, after much muttering that I wouldn't, I adopted CD. But that has demonstrable convenience over vinyl.

  14. Old Tom

    BBC Local Radio

    I listen to BBC Radio Lancashire, but I live outside its coverage area.

    I can mostly receive on FM at home and in my car. At home - though not during live football coverage - I can listen over t'internet, getting better results. At no time can I receive the DAB signal; BBC Local radio is not transmitted on Freeview or Freesat.

    However, during live football coverage, the internet feed is cut, and FM is the only way I can listen to that station. I understand the licensing reasons for cutting the feed at these times, but that doesn't help me at all. They're also rather tardy at switching it back on afterwards, so you don't get the half-time and post-match discussion either.

    If FM was cut, I could only listen to the station when at home, and only while live football is not being covered.

    On top of that, with their multiple FM frequencies (covering different parts of the county), they are able to cover more than one match simultaneously - this excellent service would be ended by an FM switch-off.

    Oh, and listening on my phone while leaving the football ground - great now on FM, but I'm not holding my breath for DAB support on my phone.

    Streaming you say? No, they haven't restarted the stream at that time, and in any case mobile data is choked when you've got many thousands of people all converged in a small area.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: BBC Local Radio

      "Oh, and listening on my phone while leaving the football ground - great now on FM, but I'm not holding my breath for DAB support on my phone."

      Don't worry, if that nice Minister is going to steal services from you & require you to buy new tin to use their so-called replacements, I'm sure he'll pay for the new kit out his own pocket.

      Or something like that.

  15. Sandtreader
    Stop

    Long grass

    Reminds me of Gordon Brown telling us we would consider joining the Euro when the economies converged - i.e. never. Let's hope this has a similar effect.

  16. batfastad

    Battery life

    For the last 10+ years I've been using a small LW/MW radio to listen to cricket during the winter nights. I can get through 5 test matches and a few one-dayers on 4 or 6 AAA batteries, probably about 25+ days' of usage on average. Call me when there's a DAB or internet radio the size of a wallet that can get anywhere that. I suspect that will be... never.

  17. altis2011

    DAB Fail

    By most measures DAB is, IMV, no replacement for FM:

    Audio quality : FAIL

    Coverage : FAIL

    Price : FAIL

    Battery life : FAIL

    User interface : FAIL

    It's only saving grace is the number of channels available but invariably that just means more of the same.

    *IF* we need to go digital then we should be looking at using DRM+ which is far more useful:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale

    After all:

    "[In] 2011, the paneuropean organisation Community Media Forum Europe has recommended to the European Commission that DRM+ should rather be used for small scale broadcasting (local radio, community radio) than DAB/DAB+."

    1. Piro Silver badge

      Re: DAB Fail

      DRM, what an unfortunate name...

  18. Wize

    When will they understand that DAB does not work?

    In a top floor flat (3 stories) with views over the city I got DAB reception in only one room. That was the kitchen, so my DAB radio alarm clock may as well have been a chocolate teapot.

    Imagine what the reception is like in the narrow streets below where Satnav sometimes fails to maintain a lock from the tall buildings.

    And remember:

    FM with poor reception - slightly fuzzy reception, but can still pick up the news in an emergency.

    DAB with poor reception - forget it.

  19. Deadly Headshot

    One of the biggest problems I can currently see with DAB is that the frequency used happens to coincide by that generated by LED lighting, ergo: turn on an LED light and all DABs near by lose signal! Great for trolling, of course, but terrible for a technology. Almost as bad as the whole DVB/4G thing...

    1. Nigel 11

      And the funny thing is that your FM receiver doesn't notice. That's right, FM broadcasting is far less vulnerable to interference than digital broadcasting.

      (That LED light is faulty, though. Or a cheap illegal import that doesn't meet EC RFI requirements)

  20. BigAndos

    Can't we just scrap DAB? IP stream digital radio over 3G, 4G etc. Leave FM alone as a backup, for older kit and for areas with poor mobile reception.

  21. Yugguy

    OH aye DAB.

    Excuse me while I just go out and spend HUNDREDS replacing all my radios. And change the head unit in both the cars, all for something I DONT NEED AND DIDNT ASK FOR.

    Get bent.

  22. John Smith 19 Gold badge
    Unhappy

    Remember Vaizey counts all those internet radio users as "digital" so 50% not so tough

    Which is of course complete rubbish relative to actual broadcast digital radio.

    Sneaky f**ker.

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like