back to article Boeing batteries back under spotlight as 787 burns at Heathrow

Boeing has suffered an unfortunate double-whammy after problems with two of its 787 Dreamliner aircraft in the UK on Friday. Ethiopian Airlines 787 Dreamliner fire at Heathrow Fire damage near the 787's tail London's Heathrow Airport was shut for over an hour on Friday evening after an Ethiopian Airlines 787 caught fire …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
                1. Down not across
                  Facepalm

                  Coherence, common sense,

                  "i dont need to be coherant... people who are dont have common sense"

                  Wow. Just wow.

                  First of all if you want to make your voice heard, and your potential audience to take notice (especially of the message you are attempting to convey), being coherent is rather vital. A good grammar is also important if you want the message to be understood. Bad grammar tends to lead to posts where the message gets distorted and misunderstood not to mention quite tedious to try to read if the grammar is particularly bad.

                  As for the unbelievably sweeping statement that people who are coherent have no common sense. Well, apart from it being obviously utterly incorrect pretty much means you just alienated what I'd expect to be vast majority,if not all, of your potential audience here.

                  1. Zmodem

                    Re: Coherence, common sense,

                    an audience would be groundworkers who find the CSCS card test hard read the sun and watch eastenders

                    africa has enough land, there is no point thinking that laying water mains pipe is hard and making a self sustaining farm will destroy the planet

                    1. Zmodem

                      Re: Coherence, common sense,

                      a few government run farms growing plenty of veg, and charities would just have to drive to the local market if they didnt lay the water mains and make the farms themselves

                      then there is corn to export and cover global shortages that make the headlines every year or two

                      1. Zmodem

                        Re: Coherence, common sense,

                        if you use an underground stream to fill a underground reservoir, when the reservoir is filled up, the stream could just carry on its natural path, and you would be able to have pressure pumps or put your irrigation system on for a few hours a night

              1. me n u
                Unhappy

                The rise and fall of the US empire.

                I agree.

                Teach them how to spill, firm a sintince, avoid long ron-on sintinses and lirn to punchewate?

                I can't say what's happening over there in blighty-land, but here in the US empire, education is a planned disaster. After all, it's much easier to take care of the sheep when they are down right stupid. I have watched my country become a 3rd world, 3rd rate empire over my lifetime. Saddest part is, no one (or is it noone, no-one or none?) over here seems to notice or care, and the latter scares me more than the former. :(

                1. Naughtyhorse
                  Happy

                  Re: The rise and fall of the US empire.

                  Atlas shrugged?

                2. Flashy Red
                  Facepalm

                  Re: The rise and fall of the US empire.

                  In the pursuit of power, an educated populace is something of a hurdle. Why else do you think education is such a low priority, planned disaster?

                  1. Zmodem

                    Re: The rise and fall of the US empire.

                    you think all the skeletons on charity television appeal adverts care for phd's

            1. Dodgy Geezer Silver badge
              WTF?

              Now I wonder why a perfectly reasonable comment about providing water to arid areas gathers 2 downvotes?

              1. petur
                FAIL

                "Now I wonder why a perfectly reasonable comment about providing water to arid areas gathers 2 downvotes?"

                Because it is off-topic?

                1. Zmodem

                  off topic is good, and not all airlines in rich countries have the latest planes

        1. Naughtyhorse

          america is not a proper country and a full infrastructure, all the charities should send in some administrators and bring abit more money in from themselves

          a few spread out raises of taxes on the airline and other places, could bring in enough for water pipes and treatment plants etc from their own government money.

          there fixed it for you

          1. Zmodem

            i know about 3rd world countries, all the charities and government aid, should lay water mains pipe down, its not hard if they have a proper trench digger

            then make farms etc... then when people on famine camps all start to feel healthy, the country would have water mains pipe for the millions to setup new towns.. instead of being back where they started

            ethiopia should get abit more tax off of the airline and they can pay for some of it themselves

            most charities are run by celebrities who dont have a brain cell and have never actually thought anything through

            1. Zmodem

              every country has reservoirs to collect rain water, and has millions of km of water main pipe, surface reservoirs cant be dont in africa becaue the water would just be polluted by wild life

              and if you have the money you can put all the chemicals in a water treatment plant and just use river water, or underground streams, once the reservoir tank has been filled up and connect it to the mains pipe

            2. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Damm - there was I actually working on the problem and thinking it was actually quite hard. Could you just remind me where I put the reservoir - i guess on top of the biggest mountain, so that all the water flows down hill. I guess I could use one of those 3d printers to print out the pipe, cos there are quite a lot of people, and they are quite poor, and I think I'm going to need a LOT of pipe.

              1. Zmodem

                most of africa is flat, engineers can build spacestation and make tunnels under the sea

                looking at map an plotting the easiest mains pipe route, and have smaller village pipes coming off the mains through 100% open land is not hard, nor is putting in a bend in the pipe, and nor is making underground reseviors that are 1000s of gallons bigger then a well and cheaper and able to have a solar powered pressure pump

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  @ZModem (project plumb Africa...)

                  Yes great - soon the whole of the planet will be covered in human beings all living in little concrete houses with water piped to the front door. Meanwhile we can all watch the world that was on our flat screen TVs (e.g. forests, tigers, coral reefs, thousands of other things). But the most important thing is to squeeze as many lovely human beings together so they can all enjoy each others miserable company.

                  Yes - I am a bit of a misanthrope. Fix things for people - but make it all sustainable for the planet - NOT just some stupid vision of plumbing up the whole of African so they can "build cities" all over the place.

                  </rant>

    1. Sadie
      Holmes

      Probably because Ethiopian is a pretty well run airline, it's profitable for the government and helps contribute to employment and improving the country as a whole.

      1. Zmodem

        I said they should check the taxes because the their government can pay for water pipes and treatment plants

        you can give all camps charities spend time giving bottled water within a few months and lay a whole infrastructure for the whole country in 10 years

        along the pipe path you can have farms with sprinklers to grow food and export

        1. Steven 1
          Alert

          @Zmodem

          Is amanfrommars broken or something?

          1. Zmodem

            Re: @Zmodem

            charities combines and government aid costs over $500 million a year going to africa

            a few trench diggers cost £1m each, JCB`s would be donated...

            laying some water mains pipe is kids work for all the army and other engineers that are always in africa making wells

            they only need 1 water treatment plant to run the mains off, if they need to build a new plant

            there is no other way to stop your famine etc

            1. Zmodem

              Re: @Zmodem

              then you just burn some land, and have water from the mains pipe to soak it all and then plough it and you have a farm that does`nt need aload of chemicals to grow some potatoes

          2. Naughtyhorse

            Re: @Zmodem

            lol

            amanfrommars was broken right out of the box!

            1. Zmodem

              Re: @Zmodem

              no.. some countries cant grow food because the soil has no nutriants..

              you burn land, you flatten it with 1 of these https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/John_Deere_roller%2C_U.S._Navy%2C_Camp_Covington%2C_NMCB-133%2C_080928-N-1106H-001.jpg/800px-John_Deere_roller%2C_U.S._Navy%2C_Camp_Covington%2C_NMCB-133%2C_080928-N-1106H-001.jpg

              you then plough the burnt foilage into the earth, keep it wet and plough it a few more times, there is enough elephant and zebra to other compost

              if you have a proper trench digger, you just have to drive it along, and drop pipe in the 2 foot trench and bolt the pipe together, and put in some valve every mile or two, so you can stop the water through surface drain bolt taps, when there is a leak

              1. Zmodem

                Re: @Zmodem

                most of the famine camps would all start to feel healthy within 6 months with enough water, potatoes and cabbages and buffalo stew, then they would all start to work on farms, and the world would never be short on corn etc

              2. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Elephant and zebra my a****!

                Elephant and zebra my arse! You're building cities all over the place remember? And killing off all the elephant and zebra as you go - they get in the way.

                1. Zmodem

                  Re: Elephant and zebra my a****!

                  hows having a water mains pipe 6 feet underground messing up the planet

                  this is what a proper trench digger looks like :

                  http://i.istockimg.com/file_thumbview_approve/6032995/2/stock-photo-6032995-heavy-equipment-trench-digger.jpg

                  you need water mains pipe.. to start farms and fertilize the land to stop famine

                  http://www.access-irrigation.co.uk/sites/default/files/imagecache/headerimage/field-sprinkler.jpg

                  1. Zmodem

                    Re: Elephant and zebra my a****!

                    you could have a billion acre`s of new farm land in africa, and you would`nt even know about it, unless you follow the roads that will appear along the water mains pipe when harvest comes

                    1. Zmodem

                      Re: Elephant and zebra my a****!

                      and etc

                      some fertilizer once you have made some farm land by burning, and 10,000km of pipe and a few trench diggers, costs alot less then cargo ships of rice, bottled water, water chemicals, and all inland transportation of it all

                      1. Someone Else Silver badge
                        Go

                        Re: ZModem

                        According to El Reg's medallion criteria, you need 1000 upvotes to get a silver medallion. Seems ZModem is on a mission to get 1000 downvotes by the end of the week. I propose a bullshit brown medallion for reaching that particular milestone....

                        1. Zmodem

                          Re: ZModem

                          they arnt called comment tards for nothing

                          africa -> globe map -> actual physical size in relation to all other countries

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Zmodem.....

      Can i recommend this, a damm good read and you might bloody learn something about "3rd world" countries.

      http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nowhere-Like-Home-ebook/dp/B00ADSNCV8/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1373875065&sr=1-1

  1. This post has been deleted by its author

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Theory

      This image seems to suggest you're right - there is a battery in the rear to start the APU, near to where the fire occurred:

      http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2013/01/17/00/23/XsZ5c.La.91.jpg

      With only a couple of dozen aircraft in service, battery fires had happened multiple times. And yet Boeing stated 'we might never know the cause', because they'd been unable to replicate the problems. So they just tweaked some stuff, put a bit more space around the batteries, thicker fire protection, venting, and so on, and the FAA approved the fix.

      If this is a battery fire, the Screamliner needs to be grounded UNTIL they actually figure out what is causing these fires. It is not acceptable to just apply some sticking plaster, cross fingers, and send them up again. There have been multiple fires, it is not a freak occurrence, there is a clear indication that SOMETHING is wrong. They need to figure out what is wrong before they fix it.

      1. Richard Jones 1
        Unhappy

        Re: Theory

        That image has a write up stating that the batteries were mounted under floor with a small unit for the APU in the tail. I do not believe that above the ceiling in front of the fin is that same location at all.

        Speculation about the batteries is understandable, whether it is reasonable or anywhere near right is another matter all together. At this state it appears it could be almost anything - including spontaneous combustion of passenger items stowed in error - though this is as unlikely as many of the other suggestions!

    2. Dodgy Geezer Silver badge
      Flame

      Re: Theory

      ...Obviously Boeing need to think again about Li-Ion, they are clearly unsafe for aircraft....

      I use LiPo batteries for model boats and aircraft. They are well understood to be dangerous by the modelling community, and usually charged in protective containers to minimise the impact of fire or explosion.

      But laptop manufacturers were crying out for a new battery technology, and so the world was disinclined to do too many safety studies when they came out...

      1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
        Thumb Down

        Re: Theory

        Bullshit. Are you implying your Graupner model stuff LiPo shit is the the same as the one in planes? Next you will be telling me that avionics is built on Windows.

        > disinclined to do too many safety studies

        Evil capitalists p0wning you? More like consumers want these, and it works quite well (people are not blowing up right and left and even state regulators don't complain too much) so it's on the market. Or are you seriously implying that you prefer to carry a Vietnam-era lead-acid backpack for your laptop?

        1. A 11
          Happy

          Re: Theory

          http://media02.hongkiat.com/bsod/airplane.png

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Theory

          "Next you will be telling me that avionics is built on Windows."

          Not yet, but there's allegedly been Windows for Warships for a while now.

          And a little birdy tells me that one of the major >safety critical< avionics software players has a new man in charge, who has been heard to say "low level test is unnecessary". Low level test is the bit that tests that the code in the PROMs actually performs as per the requirements specification. There are already lots of prior desk-type tests to check that the software design conforms to the requirements specification. The new faith apparently requires believers to testify that these simpler, earlier (and by coincidence shorter and cheaper) tests are largely sufficient on their own without low level tests, and thus largely eliminate any significant need for testing the in-hardware implementation of the design????

          There might be some plausibility in this new faith if there was such a thing as a verifiably correct compiler and runtime (not to mention something verifiably correct to run it on, e.g. Viper, except it wasn't really, was it).

          Anyway the point is that believers of the new faith presumably wouldn't care if the safety critical software did run on Windows, as long as the design passes its tests and the regulatory authorities are satisfied that the suppliers have followed due process, as per documentation (just like due process was followed on the 787)..

          Yes I know it sounds unbelievable.. I'm hoping someone has misunderstood.

          But if they haven't misunderstood, then some folk will still have to have faith anyway, because unbelievers go to the back of the salary continuation queue.

          Ross Anderson (or team), are you reading this, do you understand the implications? We're not just talking insecure smart meters here you know. Or even duff chip+PIN security,

          1. Naughtyhorse

            Re: Theory

            Ross Anderson (or team), are you reading this, do you understand the implications? We're not just talking insecure smart meters here you know. Or even duff chip+PIN security,

            Of course they understand, what you don't understand is that by the time it comes to bite the company on the ass, they will be long gone.

            QED

          2. Yag

            Re: Theory

            This guy can say anything, as long as the certification agencies don't listen to him and still require mandatory LLR verification for level A and B SW.

            Can understand why he said that, unit tests are very costly.

            But I've seen enough level D software to know how ugly things can get without proper code inspections and unit tests...

            ------------------------------------------------------------------------

            A little sidenote for those not familliar with DO-178B :

            This standard defines 5 levels, from A to E, depending of the criticity of the SW.

            - Level A software is for the most critical SW that may lead to a catastrophic accident (Typically, most of the onboard computers and display units are level A)

            - Level D software is for the non critical parts. Mostly diagnostic tests or dataloading SW that can only be activated when the equipment is plugged in a special device are example of level D SW (as long as the selector bootstrap is level A of course)

            Properly designed In Flight Entertainment SW should be classified as level C, as it may lead to an extra workload for the cabin crew - a blue screen may makes passengers quite nervous...

            - Level E is a catch-all category which means "any SW not developped following DO-178B guidelines". Windows 8 Aircraft Edition for example.

            ...

            Geez, when you have to write a sidenote longer than the actual message, you know you're doing it wrong.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Theory

              "as long as the certification agencies don't listen to him and still require mandatory LLR verification for level A and B SW."

              Look around you.

              When did you last see any industry regulator that was competent in what they are supposed to be regulating?

              Ten years ago I would have expected FAA CAA etc to have a clue about both the general approval process and access to the relevant industry experts.

              Doesn't the Dreamliner scenario (to name just one very visible example) make you wonder whether FAA CAA etc still do have a clue?

              It makes me wonder.

      2. Clive Harris
        Happy

        LiPo batteries

        >>I use LiPo batteries for model boats and aircraft. They are well understood to be dangerous<<

        Well yes, Polonium (Po) is rather dodgy stuff.

        1. Dodgy Geezer Silver badge
          Facepalm

          Re: LiPo batteries

          It's not that difficult to google LiPo and find that it stands for Lithium Polymer....

  2. John Smith 19 Gold badge
    Pirate

    Meanwhile a shadowy international financier with an accent shorts Boeing stock *again*

    It's important to ensure a good rate of return on ones investment. (...)

    1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge

      Re: Meanwhile a shadowy international financier with an accent shorts Boeing stock *again*

      Mr Goldfinger, I presume?

    2. This post has been deleted by its author

  3. Cliff

    Duracell

    That's all I need to say on the matter.

    1. Kubla Cant

      Re: Duracell

      Not likely! The cabin will be full of stupid pink rabbits banging cymbals.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Re. Screamliner

    I hereby request that this meme is used to refer to all future posts about the Dreamliner.

    That is all.

    -Anon

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like