Forget 3D: 13,000 UK homes still watch TV in black and white
13,000 households in the UK still watch TV in black and white, telly licence fee collectors have revealed. In an age when TV sets are often internet-enabled with high-def plasma screens and 3D capabilities, some people obviously like to keep it simple. And cheap too. At £49, a black-and-white TV licence is cheaper than the …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Re: WTF?
lol
you think I need training
sign yourself up to Fourier 101
then we can talk
Re: WTF?
almost all freeview STB come with RF connectors and they clearly don't just pass the analogue signal though as you get all the digital channels.
Yeah surely the B&W tvs dont have scart or other input (as mine didn't) meaning that they can't have a freview box unless it's plugged into a tape recorder then outputted to RF... how likely is that!
Freeview boxes will have RF sockets, like every other piece of broadcast equipment (like Sky boxes).
> Freeview boxes will have RF sockets, like every other piece of broadcast equipment (like Sky boxes).
You should test more, Test man. Sky boxes are among the very few digital TV receivers that still have RF modulators in them. I have an oldish Labgear/Icecrypt one that has, I've not seen others recently
"...added that Britons lead the world in accessing TV content over the internet. "
Thirty miles from London - and the digital TV signal is still unreliable due to local high buildings. Analogue was never a problem. BBC iPlayer isn't brilliant either - with its compression artefacts, jumps, and disconnections. The internet connection is apparently solid at 12mbps.
I'm about 25 miles from the Crystal Palace transmitter. No problems with either analogue (before the switchoff) or digital.
That said, if you're 30 miles away, you tried pointing your outside aerial at a different transmitter? If you are in the south of Hertfordshire, there should be one nearer Cambridge to point to.
Crystal Palace has always been the town's terrestial TV source. Sandy Heath is closer - but that path was blocked for just about everyone in my part of town by a very large building about 40 years ago. The CP analogue signal was good - and remained useable even after a tall building went up in the next street. However digital TV then went from mostly ok to almost useless. It has remained so even after the switchover and presumed power boost. The FM radio from Wrotham is reasonable - but DAB is very poor on most days.
even on modern tellys,
you can adjust the colour balance and making an CVBS to rf-modulator is easy....
I have a BW license as i'm not paying the beeb the fucking rip-off amount they want so she can watch corrie...
£50 is more reasonable and as long as my name is on that database, i get left alone...
Rip off
People call the license fee a rip off, but will spend the same over 2 0r 3 months with Sky. Virgin, and presumably soon BT.
The BBC license fee is an absolute fucking bargain for what you get. Spend a few months forced to watch TV in any other country on the planet and you realise how good ours is...and don;t fool yourself thinking ITV and a few other channels would be as good as they are if the BBC wasn't here.
Re: even on modern tellys,
I think the License fee IS a bargin, 4 channels with decent programs, 2 kids channels, Radio, News... NO adverts
Compare that to sky, where you pay to watch shows WITH adverts....
I'll happily pay my TV license to get the content!
Re: Rip off
Not true.
I dont have sky, i dont have virgin and i most certainly dont have BT.
I have a cable broadband connection and a usenet account.
I can watch all the telly i like, in HD for very little outlay...
I have NO need for terrestrial TV but pay the bw fee to keep the buggers away from my door and save me getting up to abuse them....
Re: Rip off
It's no bargain when you have no choice - they should just take it out of other taxes instead as basically everyone has to have one unless they genuinely do not own a telly - unlikely.
Re: Rip off
So you don't watch broadcast TV but you pay them anyway?
You mug.
Considering they can't do anything as they are not allowed in your house (they're not the police), you don't need to worry at all. All you do is send them a form saying you have no TV. Problem solved. Once every two or three years they'll visit or send a letter but that is it. Don't pay it if you don't have to.
Re: Rip off
"and don;t fool yourself thinking ITV and a few other channels would be as good as they are if the BBC wasn't here."
I wouldn't describe ITVs output for the last 10 years or so as in any way 'good'. They should just rename the channel to CTV - Cowell Television and be done with it.
I do agree with you thought that the BBC, however, well worth the licence fee. Some great programming, educational programmes such as Stargazing Live, Africa etc, great drama series, their comedy output is keeping Comedy Central's evening schedule filled (in between reruns of friends).
Re: Rip off @cornz 1
I hope that you are only using usenet for your content, because if you watch 'live' TV over the Internet (yes, it's a bit of an ambiguous definition, but I believe that it means material that is broadcast over the Internet while being broadcast to air, even if delayed by a few minutes), then you still need a TV license. Your computer becomes TV receiving equipment under the terms of the law.
But if you are using usenet, expect a letter from your ISP accusing you of copyright infringement.
What's not clear is whether the fact that you could watch Internet broadcast TV but don't is enough to remove the requirement for a license.
Re: Rip off
Except he does have a television. He just thinks he's special and shouldn't have to pay what everyone else does.
Re: Rip off
The TV licence isn't a rip off if you watch anything on BBC channels, or even ITV, Channel 4 or Channel 5 as they all get a small proportion of the fee. It's even justifiable if you watch any Terrestrial RF or Satellite broadcast TV since some of the fee goes to pay the OFCOM licences for the RF frequencies.
That said, you should have a choice. There's no good reason I can see why you should need a TV licence if you have Virgin Media. The fees to the BBC should be part of the cost of the Virgin package, with no TV licence required, since there's no OFCOM licence fee for cabled broadcasting.
Re: Rip off
Of course i have a TV, how else do i watch the stuff the beeb themselves transmit after broadcast on iplayer???
And did you not read that i DO pay a fee, but i aint paying 150 odd quid so she can watch corrie....
Please engage eyes before gob...
Re: Rip off
The difference is we CHOOSE to pay other providers. With the BBC, we do not get a bloody choice in the matter.
Re: Rip off @cornz 1
"What's not clear is whether the fact that you could watch Internet broadcast TV but don't is enough to remove the requirement for a license."
Actually it is VERY clear…
The mere possession of equipment capable (even tuned to the correct frequency) DOES NOT GIVE RISE TO THE REQUIREMENT TO HAVE A LICENSE.
A license is ONLY required if such equipment is use to watch or record broadcasts (from any source, even the continent) as they are being broadcast.
I could have been previously licensed and watching BBC1, turned of my TV and cancelled my license, my TV is still tuned into BBC1, but as I am not watching or recording it, I need no license.
HTH
Re: Rip off
<pedant>
last time i checked - about 20 years or so ago - corrie was on ITV - non license payer funded
</pedant>
Re: Rip off
As I posted above, ITV (along with Channel 4 and Channel 5) do receive some of the licence fee.
It is only a very small proportion compared to what the BBC get, but they do get some.
Re: Rip off
@cornz1
Stop paying for a BW license! If you don't watch or record live TV and use only catch-up services instead then you don't need a license. If you make a false declaration about having a BW TV then you could be in for more hassle than if you told them the truth.
I've had no TV license for more than 5 years. I have to visit their website every 2 years or so to confirm that my circumstances have not changed, and I've never had a visit. It's not worth paying £100 over 2 years to avoid 3 minutes' work.
Re: Rip off @Naughtyhorse
"last time i checked - about 20 years or so ago - corrie was on ITV - non license payer funded"
The channel is irrelevant. If you watch broadcast TV in this country, you have to pay for a licence. It is an antiquated and unfair requirement (especially for those of us who pay for Sky), but a legal one nonetheless.
Re: even on modern tellys, @MrXavia
"NO adverts"
The BBC DO advertise. All of their radio and TV channels advertise the other BBC radio and TV channels, all day long. Radio 1 and 2 (I can only stomach the latter) have as many 'ad' breaks as the commercial stations, so I actually don't think there to be any improvement in the quality over commercial stations, which is why I usually stick on a CD.
The BBC do generate some great quality TV, but I can't remember the last time I watched it as it was being broadcast. It's all either catch-up or Blu Ray for me, which begs the question; why can't I opt for Sky to turn off the live BBC channels on my subscription and stop paying for the bloody licence?
Re: Rip off @cornz 1
"But if you are using Usenet, expect a letter from your ISP accusing you of copyright infringement."
I think in this case the letter would have to come from the Usenet provider not the ISP, and only for uploaded content, which in any case wouldn't require a TV licence unless it had been captured from a live TV feed in the UK.
Re: Rip off
A bargain for what exactly? As a freeview user I have to note that I rarely if ever watch BBC channels. If I want to watch something intelligent I'll buy it and do so in my own time and as often as I want.
I sure as hell don't want to be subsidising the brain rotting shite that goes by the name of Eastenders. Nor do I want to be subsiding the kind of scum that 'get off' watching football.
As for 'wouldn't be as good' .... you are joking right? TV quality has plummeted over the last 30 years, and it wasn't very good even back then.
It's still the same old programmes
Whether you watch in B&W or glorious colour, the programmes are still the same. The news isn't any different, the soaps are just as cheesy, the comedies either make you laugh - or not and the documentaries have the same pretty images and narrative, irrespective of whether your telly displays the chrominance signal or not.
The same can be said for 4::3 formats vs. 16::9 or SD / HD. No matter what format or technology, you still get the same old programmes. So if you're happy with B&W, can't tell the difference or you do manage to get away with the cheaper licence then great. You're not missing that much in terms of actual TV content: merely the superficialities of how you perceive it.
Re: It's still the same old programmes
BBC nature documentaries - e.g. the current Africa series - are almost enough by themselves to justify (1) the licence fee and (2) getting a big HD colour telly.
Re: It's still the same old programmes
No, they arent, as they can be watched, in HD on iplayer later....
So no need for a license....
Re: It's still the same old programmes
You forgot
Palin travel documentries
Portillos railway journeys
If you (or your wife) likes it - Strictly Come Dancing
And good dramas like Doctor Who and Sherlock
Plenty of BBC HD worth paying for
@ cornz 1
So, happy to watch BBC content, but resent paying for it? Did the reg commentards come up with the term "freetard" just for you?
Re: It's still the same old programmes
"Re: It's still the same old programmes
No, they arent, as they can be watched, in HD on iplayer later....
So no need for a license...."
Or, unless you live in central london with fibre to the door...
"<buffering> Welco<buffering>me t<buffering>o Af<buffering>ric<buffering>a." (Click HD off.).
Broadcast HD is still the best option for many of us, until universal high speed broadband is rolled out.
(And I do believe that you need a licence for iPlayer / computers as potential recording equipment, besides many a student using a laptop with TV card....)
Re: It's still the same old programmes
Colour is not "superficial" unless you are blind.
Re: It's still the same old programmes
No, they arent, as they can be watched, in HD on iplayer later....
So no need for a license....
but... if no one pays the license, then how will the BBC fund the iPlayer service, let alone fund producing the shows that it'll show on it?
B&W TV
I have one, about 1" to 2" screen 1982 model, works on composite only - video camera viewfinder.
To be honest who actually gives a stuff about B&W TV, no one would prefer it, if they really want TV just let them buy a cheap digital TV.
I haven't seen a real B&W TV since Ridge Hill went colour. (My dad was an early adopter)
But
The stats don't count people with an Additional B&W tv. But Colour licence as they have at least one Colour TV, nor do they count the fraudsters.
There could be more B&W TVs than stated by B&W licence in use before ASO. My B&W TV is now just used for the radio on it (2" set).
Modulators can be separately purchased.
TV Licensing: Brain dead
My Mother had severe cataracts which effectively killed much of what she enjoyed visually, including TV.
So the idiot employees from TV Licensing came around and demanded she pay the fee. She said she had no TV to which they replied, recorded on a CCTV camera over the front door: "It doesn't matter, you still have to have a licence. Checking on people who say they have no TV is a waste of our time."
She never did pay and sure as hell, they were around the next year. A lawyer shut them up but their tracking van used to park outside the property from time to time.
No doubt the TV Licensing people think these people are cheating. Only cretins employed by TV Licensing would actually buy a new TV, especially since there is nothing but garbage on it.
The satellite channels are running endless repeats, the dog owned by Senior of OCC has been resuscitated, or has risen from the dead four times now - very poor program planning. The satellite channels have turned in to gun boosters where members of America's NRA can watch gun porn endlessly. No wonder they shoot school children.
Oh, and that BA pilot who was nearly sucked out of a window, he has done that trick 5 times, now.
Re: TV Licensing: Brain dead
If I could opt out of a TV license and save £150 or whatever it is I would not miss the BBC when there is so much more on.
Re: TV Licensing: Brain dead
There's a simple way to stop them from visiting - declare that you don't have a TV on the form. Don't merely say it to the licensing officer, actually formally write it down on the official form and send it to them. They may come once to make sure but otherwise that's it.
I don't understand why people think that by ignoring it it will all go away. Be proactive!
The licensing officer was 100% wrong and was probably trying to trick your mother into paying something, but if you get it formally down in writing the TV licensing authorities can't do shit.
Re: TV Licensing: Brain dead
I have done that, it stopped the snot-o-grams from TVL for all of 4-6 months....
Why the F*** should I have to "prove" to TVL that I don't need a license? I have told them using their website and forms numerous times and I'll be fucked if I'm going to wait in for them, providing them access to my property (that they have no legal right to), to confirm something that I have already told them…
They can go and swivel!
500 Shades of Grey
B&W TV is reality TV in Manchester, grey council blocks shrouded in grey drizzle for months on end whilst the grey people shuffle to and from their grey jobs eking out a miserable existence in a dreary grey environment.*
Colour TV is just taunting them.
(*I went there once)
This is Manchester (NSFW)
http://www.cyberspike.com/clarke/chicktow.html
http://www.cyberspike.com/clarke/beasley.html
Pint icon, hmm Boddingtons (the only thing worth getting out of bed for in Manchester)
I think my old NTL/Virgin media pace box had a RF output you could tune into but the cheapest option to get digital TV on a old TV with no SCART input is to plug a freeview/sky/tivo etc into a the SCART input on a VCR then tune the TV into the VCRs RF output. People practically give old VCR's away now, i sold 2 on ebay recently they were working perfectly but only got a couple of quid for them
The old OnDigital Pace boxes were similar to the NTL ones, I used it for a cheap freeview box on my computer monitor which has RF input.
Was all well and good, until the digital switchover rendered it useless.
Stop selling different types of Licence
You have a TV. You need a licence. Full stop. You "only have a B&W TV" - tough - you're receiving the same content, so you should pay the same as everyone else. If you choose to watch in B&W that is up to you.
Back in the days when TVs were expensive, and colour doubly so, it was a valid excuse to have a B&W TV. Nowadays there is no difference - you either have a TV, or you don't. I seriously doubt many of the 13,000 remain on a B&W TV because they can't afford to replace it - I'd be fairly confident they have chosen not to replace it (or are cheating).
Re: Stop selling different types of Licence
"You have a TV. You need a licence. Full stop."
Incorrect.
A licence is only required to watch (or record) television as it is being broadcast.
Using it for DVDs, for consoles, as a computer monitor, or to be plonked obviously in front of a window to waste TVL inspectors' time are all perfectly legal without a licence.
Also, watching iPlayer (when the programme is not being broadcast) does not require a licence.
To be fair, even the enforcers do not all know this (or at least they may pretend so).
Re: Stop selling different types of Licence
It is my understanding that the TVL agents are on commission, so they have the same incentives as parking wardens.
That many?!
Given how many TVs have packed up on me in the last 20 years, I'm astonished that many B/W sets are still working!
This topic is closed for new posts.
