85% of Windows 8 users wield the desktop on day one
Microsoft has released information about sales of Windows 8 and apps from the Windows Store, plus data on users' interactions with the new operating system. News of Windows 8 sales appeared in a blog post summarising Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Financial Officer Tami Reller's presentation to Wednesday's Credit Suisse …
not one of those usage stats means what they think
The start screen I see for less than a second every reboot (and Win8 is so buggy I've rebooted a lot).
The start screen has indeed acquired a lot of new tiles. Every time I install a desktop app a few more get added to the growing mess... all without my interacting with that screen at all! (Actually, that's a lie, I did take the time to disable every live tile after noticing they were sucking data even though I never use or even have them visible).
I don't know if installing Media Centre counts towards their app count but it wouldn't surprise me if they're bending the stats right now. Hell, with the Media Centre activating Win8 hack maybe they're boosting the Win8 numbers with it as well ;)
So I've had a large number of start screen 'page views', a large number of tiles added and I believe I got to grips with the charmless bar on day 1 because it was unavoidable before Classic Desktop bypassed Metro for me.
I think I even agreed to let Microsoft grab usage stats. Agreed because I knew how much they wouldn't want to see my desktop only usage ;)
What's heartening is 85% making the effort to avoid Metro.
Re: not one of those usage stats means what they think
Similar to my experience. I have it so when I reboot it doesn't show lock screen and auto logs me into desktop.
http://www.ghacks.net/2011/09/16/windows-8-how-to-automatically-log-on/
http://blog.laptopmag.com/how-to-eliminate-the-win8-lock-screen
I don't see the start screen unless some app drags me there. The system looks pretty normal to me now, and has been stable so far. I do like the faster boot times and lower memory usage.
"85%, she said, use the vestigial desktop on the first day. In the first three weeks, the average user adds 19 tiles to the Windows 8 start screen. 25% have added 30. 90% of customers use Charms on the first day they get the product."
I agree with tiles getting added automatically. I remove them though. I think my TIFKAM screen only has 5 tiles on it now. I left the reporting on as well, so they can see I do all I can to avoid TIFKAM.
Can't be arsed booting the Win8 VM up, but I think I might have about six icons left on TIFKAM after removing the "live" crap. I think my first reaction to that jumping, flashing, animated mess was "ARGH, MY EYES".
Do they count people who got a free MSDNAA (oh sorry, Dreamspark) version, gave it a go, then shoved it back in the computer equivalent of a dusty drawer somewhere while they go running right back to 7?
Added a start button
I installed Win8 on my Win7 laptop. I do have problems with some legacy programs and drivers, but I can work around that by using my old WinXP computer. As for the "Metro" start page, I installed a Start button (Win8 StartButton). The laptop now boots to my desktop after a momentary (brief) diversion to the Metro menu. And shutting down is a simple "start button-shut down" operation. Neat.
"Sales"
As ever, when Vole talks about "sales", what it really means is "channel stuffing".
Certainly Vole got its pound of flesh, but that should not be taken as any indication of "popularity", it's merely an indication of the level of stock gathering dust in warehouses. See Dixons, for example, who apparently bet the farm on Vista, and lost.
Which stuffed channel "partner" will be the first victim of TIFKAM®, I wonder?
"Lol"
Oh my my my. How the commentards are out in force today.
But you know what? There's nothing biting here I'm afraid!
Microsoft have SOLD 40 millions Windows 8 licenses. They've not "shipped-40-million-and-we're-waiting-for-OEMs-to-sell-them-all-and-then-pay-us"... it's 40 million licenses IN THE BANK - and they're laughing all the way to it!
"I don't like Windows 8"
"I can't work out how to shut it down"
"I hate Metro blah blah BLAH".
Do you think Microsoft gives a flying f**k if a few Fandriods on this website don't know how to use it?
They're selling licenses at a faster rate than they did with Windows 7! You're predictions of doom are the only "fail" on here - and they're truly epic!
TTFN!
Re: "Lol"
About 27,800,000 results for Windows 8 get start menu back.
Sorry, it's not a few, ahem, "fandroids" that don't like it. As I've already stated around here somewhere, Microsoft could release a great big turd and people would still buy it, because they have to buy it or be unable to run anything.
A new version of Windows selling a shitload is not impressive, sorry. It's as predictable as the sun coming up tomorrow. How many of Microsoft's customers actually want to be Microsoft customers on the other hand? I reckon that ratio is significantly less than 1:1.
Number of apps ... 25k revenue
I read this simply as the total retail value per unit of all paid apps in the store has reached USD 25k. That is if someone were to buy one of each he would have to pay USD 25k at checkout.
Charms?
Seriously?! It sounds like something you'd get with a My Little Pony or Care Bear not an "enterprise" level OS...
Re: Charms?
Maybe it's a just a strange, quarky marketing term riding on the back of the LHC successes and media exposure.
Re: Charms?
Whereas "Wizard" sounds perfectly normal, as does "widget", "Dingbat" etc. etc.
1.5 billion impressions logged
Reller also said Redmond has logged “1.5 billion impressions of customers using the home screen.”
What's an "Impression" and how have they logged it!?
Rather worrying if you ask me....maybe I should have read the EULA a bit more carefully!
Re: 1.5 billion impressions logged
....or perhaps just read the big full-screen options page with a small number but clear list of switches that ask you, during installation of the OS, whether you want to send data to Microsoft in various iterations....
=
More fake numbers by the Microsoft marketing machine
Trying to make a fool of people and spin up lies so that those numbers would become a reality then.
There aren't 40million actual Windows8 users out there.
Microsoft just hopes that so many or more will enjoy being ripped off by Christmas time buying their lies for their crap unusable Win8 Metro/ModernUI kindergarten type thing.
Re: More fake numbers by the Microsoft marketing machine
I'm looking forward to getting a machine with W8 on it.
I am the sort of mug who actually wants a lappy with a touch screen and W8
(I just hope the bugger runs Chamsy's MagicQ and lets me build a lighting control for the screen)
(Currently running XP and offered a machine with Vista on it)
Re: More fake numbers by the Microsoft marketing machine
As someone who's owned an Asus TF101 for a while, and now moved onto a Nexus 7 (TF101 converted to a media center plugged into TV) - I can tell you that even a laptop touchscreen is going to be too big for most gestures.
Gaming will be almost impossible with having the keyboard attached (touchscreen gaming is more suited to hands on left and right edges with thumbs inside), and the TF101 at 10" I'd say was at the limits of comfortable holding (7" is just right). Anyone who's a serious power user is not going to want to keep lifting their arms all day either - just as an experiment for a day, every time there's a button on screen, try lifting your arm to press it and compare to moving the mouse, you'll soon understand.
Ubuntu is starting to go down this route, though not as severely as Windows 8 - I booted up but didn't log in immediately the other day, and came back to the login screen to find some kind of wierd pull-down clock overlay on the screen. It's bloody annoying to have to use a mouse for hand gestures, let alone where a mouse just hasn't even been accommodated in some cases.
Very entertaining stuff
I have to admit it, I'm impressed with the bloody-minded determination involved with spinning every statistic into a prophecy of the imminent failure of Windows 8 - it makes for very entertaining reading!
Also I've said it before but the Windows 8 start menu is the best Windows start menu I've ever used. To start with the search feature actually works - I start typing and it finds the setting or program I was looking for faster than I can blink (unlike the Windows 7 one that thought that the My Documents is obviously where it should be looking for "Visual Studio"). I also get to see all the programs I actually use on a single screen, instead of having to click on "All programs", do some scrolling and navigate a folder structure.
Windows 8 is the first OS I've ever successfully used without installing my own launcher replacement (e.g. Executor)
Redmond has logged ...
an ugly package, rubbish to use, and it spies on you as well. Win Win. For Microsoft
Re: Redmond has logged ...
"spies on you" in exactly the same way Vista and 7 did.
Re: Redmond has logged ...
No, it's a bit deeper than that, because the OS fetches advertising in a good handful of Metro applications. I've seen them pre-load even if you never touch them, and I've seen things like Bing use a couple of CPU cycles even though it was never manually invoked.
I'd say there's definitely a lot more potential for tracking here than vista or 7, if that's what they want.
Sales figures
If you want sales figures, ask Start8 how many copies they have sold since Windows 8 launched!
Thanks but no thanks
I'll wait for the crackers and hackers to release "Windows 8 Pirate Edition" with all the phone-home and "you must log in to a Microsoft Account in order to do anything" bullshit stripped out, before I even think about touching it. By then those same hackers will have also jailbroken it out of the walled garden and put back all the good stuff that MS has taken out as well like a start button (I notice someone has already done this!), quick launch bar, easily accessible control panel, default to local storage, etc...
Re: Thanks but no thanks
One of the few things you can put back without third party hacks is a proper, WIndows XP-style quicklaunch bar that doesn't make quicklaunch apps look like running apps.
Unfiortunately, using the same method for bringing a start menu back doesn't work too well. You end up with an heirarchy of folders that don't fill with program shortcuts as you install stuff. On the other hand, that godawful TIFKAM thing will happily fill up with one, long, flat, confusing list of shit if you let it.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
You don't have to send info back to MS
You can install software without an MS account
It's not a walled garden (other than for Metro Apps)
Local storage is default
You don't have to logon using an MS account
If you can't work out how to get to the control panel or local storage, maybe IT isn't for you.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
Umm...you don't have to log into a Microsoft account. If you read the screen, there is an option to not do so.
The Start button vs Menu is an argument that's been done to death, so I won't bother. You quickly get used to it if you just take the time to set it up cleanly and properly - about the same amount of time to have a clean and tidy Start button menu.
The Taskbar is perfectly suitable as a Quick Launch bar. In fact, if you pin programs to the task bar it gives you more options, as you can right-click and get a series of very useful options as well. The old quick launch bar has been absolutely superceded.
The control panel is immediately accessible VERY quickly by typing 'c o n' into the home screen. It appears quickly at the top of the list. The lack of being able to get to it is like the mythos of it being hard to shut down. Ctrl+Alt+Del. Power Button, Shut Down.
The default is local storage - that's a myth as well, no idea where you made that one up from.
It's also not a walled garden. I can install all the software I could install on XP, or especially Windows 7, without any qualms or locked down behaviour.
It's strange. I don't particularly like the new Start screen - so much so that I've set up Desktop as the first and main tile that I click on without thinking when I start my PC up, and my Desktop has been set up with my programs neatly arranged on the taskbar as I want them, so I rarely - if ever - need to go to the Start screen. I don't even particularly want to defend Windows 8....it's just that when I see such excessive degrees of bullsh*t as I've seen here I just want to step in and clarify things.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
The Start button vs Menu is an argument that's been done to death, so I won't bother. You quickly get used to it if you just take the time to set it up cleanly and properly - about the same amount of time to have a clean and tidy Start button menu.
You mean you have to reorganise and rearrange TIFKAM, every single damned time you install something. That's something I haven't had to do with the rather more sensibly heirarchical start menu yet. Really, it's worse than trying to use an Android phone by wandering through the App Drawer trying to look for stuff.
The Taskbar is perfectly suitable as a Quick Launch bar
In your opinion. In my opinion - and in the opinion of others - it's a confusing kludge that makes it not immediately obvious what programs are running or not.
The old quick launch bar has been absolutely superceded.
Evidently not.
In fact, if you pin programs to the task bar it gives you more options, as you can right-click and get a series of very useful options as well.
You can do that without pinning anything.
The control panel is immediately accessible VERY quickly by typing 'c o n' into the home screen
You mean like Windows 7? Come on, where's the advantages of TIFKAM again?
The lack of being able to get to it is like the mythos of it being hard to shut down. Ctrl+Alt+Del. Power Button, Shut Down.
You can shut Windows 7 down using the Vulcan Nerve Pinch as well. Come on, show me a real TIFKAM advantage.
It's strange. I don't particularly like the new Start screen
Well at least we agree on something.
Now all Microsoft need to do is get rid of it, or sideline it at least. Or maybe, possibly, just let those of us who don't want an Xbox, have our desktops back.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
Oh, I won't argue the point that the Start screen can indeed make a bloody mess - I even posted about it somewhere else in this thread. I do, though, see some potential for it, but in it's current iteration it really isn't all that good. Having said that - I always avoided the Start menu as much as I could as well, because it was always made into such a bloody mess by all these companies who thought they knew better on how the Start menu folder system should be designed. If you actually try to tell me that the Start Menu didn't turn into a debacle after installing a good few programs then I call shenanigans on you. The one practical difference between Windows 7 and 8 now for me is that with Windows 8 I actually have a clean desktop - but that's more because I'm better behaved with where I save my stuff.
Why is the taskbar so confusing? I always get a very strong whiff of 'I don't like new!' when people gripe that they want their quick launch bar back. It's so unnecessary. Where is the advantage? Yes, I admit that if your eyes are so bad you can't see when a program is running then it may be a pain, but then there is also the magnifier accessory for someone with that level of eye condition.
Very true that I don't have to pin programs to the task bar to right-click them! Thank you for pointing that out....was there a point or were you just arguing for arguments sake? I think the latter. Still, you just made the point that it's even easier to use than I said it was.
But what is actually wrong with being able to type 'c o n' into the start screen? It's different, and I've already said it's not my favourite aspect, but it doesn't actually make things any more difficult, does it? So why complain? I could tell you why, but it would just be repeating myself.
Why are you obsessed with the (rather pettily named TIFKAM - I mean, come on, it's like referring to Microsoft as M$ - it's just bloody juvenile) advantages? It doesn't actually make things any more difficult than they were before, but the whole platform works better.
Regardless, you're still perfectly capable of installing and sticking with Windows 7, or even XP, or if you really want you can go back to 2000, 98SE, or even 95, or 3.11 (before that they weren't worth mentioning). If that's what you want to install, then install one of those. You don't HAVE to install Windows 8, and there is plenty of life in Windows 7 (http://windows.microsoft.com/en-GB/windows/products/lifecycle) so if you don't like 8, don't install it.
Personally, I think the Start screen needs a lot of work to make it usable, but then I actually see it once in a blue moon, since I immediately run the Desktop and everything I have is set up from there. However, I LOVE the fact that those of us with an XBox and/or Windows Phone 8 device are getting interoperability and a common shared storage and platform. If you don't want an XBox, then don't buy one, and stick with Windows 7 if that's what you prefer. Just please quit trying to tell us all how bad Windows 8 is when it really isn't all that bad. It loads (very) quickly, it runs everything I've thrown at it, it syncs up my data across my 3 devices (4 counting the spare XBox), and the parts of it I don't like are actually quite easily avoidable.
Back to windows 7
I upgraded my pc from windows 8 to windows 7 this last weekend.
It's not that I hate windows 8.
It's that all my applications are "desktop" applications, and they are a little less easy to get at and use with the new user interface. And the new stuff doesn't seem to have any real attaction to me.
So overall windows 7 runs my stuff better than windows 8. So I upgraded back to it :)
Re: Back to windows 7
Ho, ho, ho, you said upgrade from 8 to 7.
As for getting at your programs - load one in 7, right click, pin this program to the taskbar. That works in Windows 8 too, in fact, the reason that MS removed the start menu was because of the amount of people using this feature.
Re: Back to windows 7
Yes, I can make it work. it's usable.
But it's a little less convenient for me and there isn;t really anything new I want to use on it.
But "almost as usable" isn't much of a reaosn to upgrade
One but don't use...
I recently purchased a new lap top - so I got win8, so I'm one of the stats, I guess, despite repartitioning almost immediately, installing Ubuntu, and not using win8 since.
Getting an OS free laptp is possible but often more expensive as you can't get it via the major resellers who can undercut the smaller ones, so MS win whatever the consumer actually wants.
90% of customers use Charms on the first day they get the product.
The other 10% haven't found where Charms is yet.
Re: 90% of customers use Charms on the first day they get the product.
The reality is probably more that 80% of people scooted their mouse into the right corners of the screen and some weird garbage popped up over there, then they tried to get rid of it. 10% used 8 before, and are OK with it. The remaining 10% is made up of people who have used a program to disable hot corners entirely, or are confused as all hell.
Umm...
'85%, she said, use the vestigial desktop on the first day.' - and believe me, they probably kept on using it, and trying to keep it in the foreground.
'In the first three weeks, the average user adds 19 tiles to the Windows 8 start screen. 25% have added 30.' - well, that's because every piece of software you install puts at least 3 or 4 tiles into the bloody thing. Rather than being sensible and folder-ising each program install, Windows 8 allows any installation program to put it's entire list of what would have been icons, like 'Readme', 'Uninstall', 'Visit us on the web', onto the main Start window. My Start window has become a setup of 3 set up columns of stuff I want, then off to the side are a hundred other tiles I just can't be bothered to get rid of, since I can't mass remove them and still remain confident that I'll be able to find them again - especially in the case of more specialised Uninstall programs.
' 90% of customers use Charms on the first day they get the product.' - and most likely 85%+ don't want to use it again - except that's the only way they figure out how to shut the PC down. The other 10% probably didn't figure on moving the mouse to the bottom-right corner to look for superfluous and unneeded extras.
'Reller also said Redmond has logged “1.5 billion impressions of customers using the home screen.”' - hey, Microsoft, people don't have a choice of using the bloody 'home screen'. It's not like the Start menu in previous versions where you click on it to go somewhere. It's the home screen - it's where EVERYTHING comes from.
If retails is anything to go by, the machines that still sport Win7 sell at a premium to the newer arrivals with Win8.
At least in the States.
