Apple 15in MacBook Pro with Retina Display
You’ve got to hand it to Apple. Having created the first Ultrabook about three years before Intel even got around to coining the brand, it has now taken another step forward with the new MacBook Pro With Retina Display. The 2880 x 1800 screen is certainly a looker, and you can understand why Apple has chosen to focus on that …
Re: Alienware
Yep, and that was Tom's Hardware's conclusion, after some extensive research: A base-level Mac or Macbook is good value and hard to match, component for component. They did, of course, recommend that you upgrade RAM and the like yourself...
Re: ....you failed.
>should other vendors start using it.
Sony already use it
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/light-peak-thunderbolt-vaio-radeon,13019.html
>But there still has to be something in it for Apple.
There is: they get to make computers that do want they think people will want a computer to do... just as Apple's developing FireWire (i.Link, IEEE 1394) with partners gave Macs a simple way to take content with digital camcorders and the external hard disks that dabbling with video usually entails, or for using high resolution scanners.
Re: Nonsense
>miserly 5 hours max
That was 5 hours streaming HD video on loop, not 5 hours maximum.
>cannot be upgraded
Please define 'upgraded'. I can't easily upgrade my CPU or GPU in my DELL laptop. This Macbook effectively has PCIe-onna-cable.
>Business and First Class
have power sockets and or beds.
Re: Alienware
Comparing an Alienware to a Macbook is like comparing a Ferrari to a Lexus sedans, it makes no sense.
The first one is optimized for games, the second one will burn your desk or cook your eggs after 3 minutes of Crysis 3.
Re: you still use optical drives?
Re: you still use optical drives?
Why, yes. My last copy of CS5 and Quark eXpress came on DVD as it happens, as did the operating system, OSX, I believe it was called.
AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA ... TOTALLY AGREE..
TOTALLY OWNED!
Optical drives are less used these days but they are nowhere near dead... only a stupid consumer or fanboi would dare make such a coment. When you have a job in IT or have at least some real world experience of supporting "stupid end users like yourself" will you see that CD/DVD use is still wide and varied from installing OS's, imaging/cloning, software and updates etc... still supplied on disk.
Why? because they are quick and cheap. Yes flash/USB media will eventually kill them off but we're years from that.
So you've seen this screen for yourself then and taken the time to understand the difference it makes?
On some scenarios it's not that much better, but start browsing thorough hi-res photos and it's amazing. Head down the Apple shop and have a play about with one. Load iPhoto for example.
It's a lovely screen and the hardware specs are amazing, but the inability to even upgrade the onboard RAM, the loss of onboard ethernet (because God knows we love the opportunity to pay an extra £25 for an adapter to restore access to something that even £150 netbooks have as standard :S), the lack of an onboard optical drive, and the enormous Apple tax on the SSD upgrade pricing have me a bit concerned.
I will say it's great to see someone finally push for vertical resolutions of substantially more than 1000 pixels on a laptop, but I'm not convinced that any of us actually need (or will benefit, particularly) 220ppi displays...there again, talk of "need" is going to be considered inappropriate when discussing a machine like this.
I'm on the fence re the ram. The inability to upgrade the ram when you can buy it with 8 or 16gb (only $200 for the extra 8gb is decent by apple standards, less great by intel standards), but it occured to me that twice in the past I have had to replace the ram in laptops after a couple of years. It might be the heat, humidity of lots of flights and the accompanying xray machines that killed the ram, but it did happen, and on decent machines (IBM thinktank and a Tosh Portege) cheap consumer models.
Do I need the display, no, I can work now so I will still be able to work, but it would be nice for working on photos to have more detail. There is likely to be a considerable number of photogs and indy folks who buy this as a single machine to do many things pretty darn well. Plus there is a little value in showing up with a nice looking laptop to premeets with clients.
The ethernet port baffles me, surely it would have been simpler to compress the size of the ethernet port, call it mini ethernet and bundle an adapter which would cost about 2 pebbles to make in China. Given we would all lose them in about 2 weeks they could probably sell them for $10, make a huge profit and not upset everyone. I guess they either figured screw people, or they figured enough people will use wireless (but why not add ac rather than n?) instead of wired?
Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
If Apple "created the first Ultrabook three years before Intel", then Samsung must have created the first Macbook Air at least 2 years before Apple got around to it (Samsung Q30).
I am still using a 2006 vintage tweak of the Q30, namely a Q40 that has a smaller footprint than *any* Macbook Air - and it's lighter than the 1st gen ones too. For the record Samsung shipped Q30s with SSDs (if you could find one) too, although my Q40 has a boring old 1.8" hard disk. :)
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
that hardware you mention doesn't look like an ultrabook at all. it's quite thick and chunky. From specs of q30: Dimension: 287.7 x 197.5 x 18.0 ~ 23.8 mm (without battery).
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
q30 is a netbook, or ultra-portable, with a 12.1" screen, 24mm height and a plastic body.
The macbook air you are comparing it to has a 13.3" screen, 4-19mm tapered height and an aluminium unibody construction.
The lower height, larger screen and unibody chassis is what makes it an ultrabook. I'm not saying it is better or worse, just that the macbook air defines the ultrabook category.
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
`The Q30 was a light and reasonably thin notebook for the time, but not an Ultrabook (defined by Intel as being less than 0.8 inches thick)
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
Sadly you are both wrong, the Vaio X505 was launched in 2004, beating Apple and Samsung by at least a year. I'd still takes its latest the devlopment, the Vaio Z Series, over with the MBA or indeed this new fangled MBP. OSX really isn't for me (far too un-intuitive after 20 years of Windows), and I think the Apple laptops are ugly things personally.
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
Actually the Samsung boxes have a magnesium alloy underside. As for what defines an Ultrabook (tm), Intel are the people to ask, not Apple.
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
Dunno why you got down voted - the X505 looks like a fair comment to me. That said I haven't seen a Vaio I fancied yet - but that's a personal taste thing rather than a technical argument. :)
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
There's always a lot of interesting voting going on in Apple threads. Apple fanatics flock to vote down everyone who dares say "There's no ethernet port, no optical drive, and it's at least a grand more than I'd want to pay", while anti-Apple fanatics flock to vote down anyone who dares say "The screen is lovely and the cost is more or less equivalent to other equally-specced competitors", and both vote down people who say "Yes, the cost is more or less that of equally-specced competitors, but when you add in the cost of an optical drive and a handful of overpriced Apple adaptors you add a good couple of hundred quid on to the Apple's cost" because it's far too balanced.
For whatever reason this topic seems to make people very emotional.
Back on topic and for the record, it's a lovely looking machine, a beautiful screen, nice specs, and if it cost a grand less and came with an ethernet port and an optical drive I'd be very interested in it. Since it costs what it does, has no optical drive and no ethernet, I'm not, and my next computer will either be the standard 15" MBP or back to the world of non-Apple manufacturers running Linux, on machines most likely engineered to a lower build quality, but with bigger hard drives. No flaming necessary.
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
Oh my fucking eyes! I just googled that POS. First ultra book?! Get real, that's a Fisherprice toy.
Re: Surely some mistake, the Samsung Q30 was the first Ultrabook ;)
I am real. My "POS" "Toy" has been helping me earn cash since 2006. I bought it so that I could write code anywhere without running out of space for my elbows (eg: train seats, airline seats), preferably without catching fire or burning my nuts in the process. There were very few machines that met those criteria back in 2006. I did actually try a Sony Vaio X505 (maybe you reckon that looked nicer) but I hated the keyboard which is a big deal when you earn your living using a keyboard.
Want one
the screen will be amazing for Logic, always have to have multiple large screens to fit everything on, with the extra real estate it'll make making / performing music away from the studio much nicer.
no bluraydrive
Such a gorgeous screen, but no built-in bluray drive??? How are you supposed to play back high quality video movies? Streamed HD movies are compressed so much, they're hardly better than DVD quality.
Re: no bluraydrive
Because as we all know, people mostly buy extremely slim and portable top-end laptops only to cart around their Blu-ray collection with them.
Is it seriously worth burdening this legacy-free machine with 'moving parts' just in case someone is too stupid to copy a film to their drive or use an external player..?
Re: no bluraydrive
How many true HD, not over compressed, full-length movies can you fit on a 256Gb drive? (after the other stuff you have on there, that is)
Re: no bluraydrive
"How many true HD, not over compressed, full-length movies can you fit on a 256Gb drive? (after the other stuff you have on there, that is)"
How many movies are you likely to need to carry around with you at all times..?
Re: no bluraydrive
Have you tried flying to Australia with a 2-year old? You'd be surprised just how many DVDs you need.
It's sad that the valid criticisms of this device - the price, the paltry storage, the lack of built-in connectors - are being lost under the deluge of fanbois screaming that because they would never use it for X, that nobody should ever expect X on a device. There are valid complaints here, no matter how shrilly they're being made.
Take ethernet connectivity - let's say you're hotdesking in an office and the wifi signal is poor but there's an ethernet connector. You need your adapter (cost £30+).
Or there's storage - 256GB doesn't go very far, particularly if, as suggested above, you're forced to load films on to your machine because there isn't a dvd drive.
And it doesn't help that the 'portable' thunderbolt external hard drive (cost £400) isn't portable at all, because it requires an external power supply.
I'm sure it will sell well to the sort of people who downvote posts criticising its weaknesses, but it is, like most Apple devices, fantastic - if you're going to use it in exactly the way Apple expect you to.
Re: no bluraydrive
If you are spending £1800+ on a top end laptop to be used as a DVD player for a two year old you have more money than sense, but hey - its your money.
I really don't get the problem people are having over this lack of DVD / Blu-ray drive issue. Do you still complain it doesn't have a floppy drive or RS232..? Apple are not forcing this machine on anyone - if you don't want one or it doesn't meet your two year old's requirements, then don't buy it.
The alternative is that nobody is allowed to own a machine without a DVD drive in it because somebody's kids might want to watch a DVD..? Where does that end?
Re: no bluraydrive
It's not JUST going to be used as a DVD player; only someone determined to miss the point would make such a ludicrous comment. The claim was that nobody could POSSIBLY need to carry around 'that many' DVDs, and I gave a good example of a situation where one would have to. Would you prefer a screaming toddler on a 14-hour flight? I can think of plenty of other examples.
If a laptop had come out 10 years ago without a floppy drive, I would complain. DVDs and Blu-ray are current technologies. You might not, but out there in the real world everyone still uses them.
And as for "don't buy one", I don't intend to. I know that fanbois will lap it up, but people capable of looking beyond a shiny case and a badge, like me, won't. That doesn't make my valid complaints any less valid, and it doesn't make the hyperventilating about an overpriced laptop with overpriced accessories any more ridiculous.
Re: no bluraydrive
Your 'complaints' seem based on personal bias rather than having any practical merit. You appear simply intent on simply finding something to criticise. If it had an optical drive, you would no doubt spend your time complaining about it not needing one and how much thinner it could be without.
Re: no bluraydrive
"Such a gorgeous screen, but no built-in bluray drive??? How are you supposed to play back high quality video movies?"
You watch what you just recorded on your moby-expensive HD pro gear.
Re: no bluraydrive
"And it doesn't help that the 'portable' thunderbolt external hard drive (cost £400) isn't portable at all, because it requires an external power supply."
Then use a USB3 external hard drive.
Re: no bluraydrive
I have a portable thunderbolt drive that doesn't require any external PSU. There's plenty of them around (and Seagate do an adapter for SATA drives that doesn't need a PSU either). I'd suggest if you're picking holes, you find better ones.
Re: no bluraydrive
@Fitz:
"Your 'complaints' seem based on personal bias rather than having any practical merit"
I think you're missing the point here. His complaints are about practical limitations that he sees with the machine that would affect his use of the machine.
You may see no limitations at all, but your view isn't the only valid view in the world - the matter of the usefulness and value of a device like this isn't a question like "is the sky blue" to which there is actually only one correct answer, it's more like "what shade of blue is the sky", some people may say Cyan (yes, I'm that old) and some may say Azure. Others will say other things.
FWIW, the lack of Ethernet is puzzling on a MBP. On an Air, I can understand it, but on a MPB I'd have expected the "pro" connectivity - WiFi is great for general use, but if you want "pro" (ie: the best speed and the best reliability), it's GigE, not 802.11n.
I too would prefer if it had a BluRay drive on it, or at least a DVD drive, but it's not a deal-breaker.
I would like the RAM to be upgradeable (I've never owned a laptop that didn't eventually need this with OS upgrades and so on). But, so long as 8GB remains enough for the lifespan of the device (though I'd probably buy the 16GB version, which is I am sure what Apple would prefer too) then that's not a deal-breaker either.
The main deal-breaker for me is that I already have a late-2011 MBP, and although I could wangle one if I really wanted to, the enhanced screen isn't enough for me to do that. But one with a retina screen will be on my list in 3-5 years when my MBP gets donated like the late-2008 one did. [note: both have had memory upgrades; upgrading my new MBP when new with third party memory saved a fortune]
MagSafe2 - there is an adapter
"Finally, Apple has changed its MagSafe power connector, for some reason, so any spare power supplies that you’ve bought in the past will be unusable with this model."
Not exactly true:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD504
Re: MagSafe2 - there is an adapter
Well spotted - and it doesn't cost $25 either!
Also, it was mentioned on the keynote that the magsafe had to be shrunk to be able to fit on the new machine - that's why magsafe 2 was made.
The new MacBook Pro - there is an adapter for that!
See above...
Blu-ray?
Is that the thing on the PS3 or that overpriced rental at Blockbusters?
Ah it's both alright then.
My compressed HD streaming is good enough..
Re: Blu-ray?
If you use compressed streaming why spend £1800 on an Ultra high def screen?
Re: Blu-ray?
> overpriced rental at Blockbusters
My local video shop is the same price for either. Blockbuster has always been a ripoff.
Re: Blu-ray?
"If you use compressed streaming why spend £1800 on an Ultra high def screen?"
Because blu-ray is compressed HD too? Uncompressed HD is about 667GB/h.
Blockbuster
Last time I checked: Blockbuster rentals are the same price for DVD and Bluray
Re: Blu-ray?
"If you use compressed streaming why spend £1800 on an Ultra high def screen?"
If you only want to watch Blu-ray movies, why are you spending £1800 on a laptop..?
This may come as a surprise to you, but some people actually use computers for things other than watching movies, games and porn.
SSD
256GB SSD? That's fine for me - it's what I have in my machine right now. Bigger would be nice, but not necessary. Movie files and such are what NAS boxes are for.
"but using Wi-Fi to stream HD episodes of EastEnders on the BBC iPlayer seemed like torture enough."
Did you have to watch the programme? That's what I call taking one for the troops...
About fucking time
I am looking forward to everybody and his dog copying that screen and finally killing the low-res crap we've had to put up with until now.
Re: iFixit teardown
Sounds like a load of sour grapes. Replace the battery "every so often"? I've never replaced any laptop battery more than once or before at least 5 years. Plus they're always expensive, think I paid nearly £100 for my Dell one. $200 isn't really that expensive considering this one is much larger.
Recycling an issue? You can just give it back to Apple who probably have the right tools to do it (since they refurbish them)
Let's be honest, iFixit is just pissed off that they won't be selling as many of their overpriced repair kits for this one.
Re: iFixit teardown
Yeah, "sour grapes", that must be what it is.
Even if you *do* give it back to Apple, any actual raw material recycling is going to struggle if the point is that aluminium fused to glass can't be usefully processed with current processes. With Apple (and other tech firms) apparently steering their entire product line towards "magic box status" (ie nothing inside it that a user is able or allowed to tinker with), this is a non-trivial issue.
Re: iFixit teardown
Shocking. I've been waiting about 9 months for the new MPB Pro to arrive - now I'm going to seriously reconsider. I have one of the first 2000 original Intel MPB, it has 2gb hard wired - and that it *is* annoying. Still, I run my business from it and am continually impressed that it doesn't look or feel like a 6 yr old laptop.
It is, however, on it's 2nd Magsafe adapter - the first one broke at the mag plug, needing a whole new adapter when it simply needed a plug/cable replacement. I got a 3rd party copy for less than half the Apple price.
It is also on it's 2nd battery - which is more worrying. The main reason I use Mac for my business is that I can be sure that in 5 years time I'll still be running the same installation of the OS with the same profile. That's no blinking use to me if in 2 years time I have to secure-wipe it before handing it over to the less than competent repair facility we have here in Belgium. My co-director went over 8 weeks without her 2009 MBP because it had the infamous graphics card fault.
