duh, single carrier george?
1) only one carrier vs nationwide sales
2) Carriers PUSH android, in bundles and 2 for 1 sales, and special promotions, and millions in advertising per day, where as people ASK for iOS.
3) sub-$200 options (crap as they are, there is a market for them)
4) its still new, and the users have yet to revolt from being burned and disenfranchised (though it's spinning up).
Seriously, the tone in here is pretty grim for Android. 6 months ago, this would have been 95% pro-android, but more than half the posts hare are practically spelling its doom now. Its slow to evolve, showing its security weaknesses, Flash is exactly as Apple claimed (slow, draining, laggy, crashes and only works good at all on top end stuff), and we're seeing phone after phone come out and get left behind without Froyo materializing.
As soon as there's a Verizon iPhone you're gonna see Android sales plummet. If WM7 actually works as advertised, it's going to cannibalize the rest. Why? The carriers HATE android. They only reason they have it is to keep their customers from running to AT&T. With an alternative, it will get no love... No more special data plan pricing, no more bundles, no more advertising. Carriers love control, lock-in, and no compromises, and WP7 offers that, with it;s closed store, no side-loading, no tethering without a separate plan, and no complex support headaches. Pre failed because it failed the Devs, and the carriers noticed. No apps equaled no real iPhone competition, so they stuck with android. WP7 is a viable Palm OS equivalent, and it has motion, and money behind it. They don;t like that they can;t have their skins anymore, but they would have the same with Apple too, so no real loss to them.
I give Android 2 years before it;s relegated back to where it should have never left, geeks and tweakers. (if the courts don;t pull the plug on this whole stolen Java issue).