The wheels continue to roll, and fall off, of Steve Ballmer's pan-European tour of serious-minded national and broadcast media. Stopping in the Netherlands, Ballmer dealt with the obligatory questions on whether Microsoft would build its own Kindle-style reader. We've been here before on hardware, when the wishful thinking and …
Agreed, but to your "USERS DON'T CARE!" I add "so long as it works',
Which is why Windows 7 will be taken with a fairly large dose of "The Emperors New Clothes"
Halo was not developed by Microsoft, who only bought Bungie AFTER they had already come up with the original Halo game.
128-bit support could be anything from bus width to data types (128-bit floating point).
Personally 32-bit Windows runs fast enough, Microsoft just needs to work on keeping Windows running fast and not slowing down as the cruft builds up. Windows is a very messy OS and needs too much maintenance, it's like a messy child.
On Wall St perception is everything
It doesn't matter what OS is technically superior. It doesn't even matter what people prefer to use.
Vista is the first time that average people have become aware of an actual OS, and not for a good reason. Most share holders are likely aware that **they** spent $5bn and many years developing a product and the people wanted to buy the previous version. That doesn't look good.
What matters here is how the the shareholders perceive things, because they're the ones who will ultimately give Ballmer the nod or the boot.
Before Ballmer, Microsoft could do no wrong. Microsoft = Windows = Computers as far as average punters go and Microsoft was Big Profit and the only thing limiting what Microsoft could do was DOJ action. That stopped in 2001 or so, and since then MSFT has gone down in value and MSFT has not done anything that looks new, exciting or profitable.
Sure, much of that is due to maturity. As a company grows and matures, it cannot keep up exponential growth. But the foot does look like it came off the gas in about 2001.
The only benchmark investors really care about is how their money would have performed if they'd invested elsewhere. Since 2004, MSFT is down a bit, AAPL is up1200% and GOOG 360%
When stuff goes right, you can be forgiven a shopping list of sins. When stuff goes wrong, people start looking for a length of rope. If Ballmer had laughed off iphone and still made Apple-like returns, he'd have been forgiven. He didn't. Everything has fallen apart on his watch.
A once great brand has eroded to almost zero.
To keep his job, Ballmer needs to show something positive. He'd better come up with a better story than "investors, investors, investors..."
Balmer must stay
Balmer is the best CEO we could dream of for Microsoft, just as Darl was SCO's and Bob Bishop was SGI's best CEO.
Drive it into the ground, babe, just like SGI and SCO! He's gonna heal the world in the process!
- Vid Hubble 'scope scans 200,000 ton CHUNKY CRUMBLE ENIGMA
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Interview Global Warming IS REAL, argues sceptic mathematician - it just isn't THERMAGEDDON
- Apple to grieving sons: NO, you cannot have access to your dead mum's iPad