back to article London cops hunt for drone pilots who tried dropping drugs into jail

Cops have seized drones being used to fly drugs into London's Pentonville prison – and are now on the hunt for the people operating them. One drone crashed while flying over the all-male jail on 14 August. Another was intercepted in “mid-flight” heading towards the prison later that same day. Police did not say exactly how …

Page:

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    According to other sources...

    The second drone was low enough to be grabbed.

    1. Hans Neeson-Bumpsadese Silver badge

      Re: According to other sources...

      All those drugs on board, but couldn't get high enough? Oh, the irony....

  2. wolfetone Silver badge

    In fairness the criminals are heeding the medical advice on the dangers of swallowing condoms filled with drugs. So every cloud and all that...

  3. Hollerithevo

    Solution

    Netting.

    1. Warm Braw

      Re: Solution

      It could provide useful occupation for the inmates:

      Naughty knaves knit and knot netting to nix narcs for nicked nonces

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Solution

        @Warm Braw - quality. Have an upvote!

    2. Roq D. Kasba

      Re: Solution

      Solitary

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Solution

      Vertical netting can be cut or flown over. Horizontal netting can be penetrated with a weighted spike under the payload.

      1. PhillW

        Re: Solution

        "Vertical netting can be cut or flown over. Horizontal netting can be penetrated with a weighted spike under the payload."

        Thats not going to get it into the cell, vid here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-37152665

        ........... and I pity any unsuspecting bugger underneath!

    4. phuzz Silver badge

      Re: Solution

      Many prisons already use netting, as even before drones it also stopped people just chucking stuff over a wall.

    5. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Solution - Netting

      The netting would need to be pretty small or a drone could simply fly above it and drop the package through... Even with small netting the "villains" could reduce the drug payload to wrapped pellets and rain them from above.

      It would certainly stop the mobile phone drops however, and given the number of inmates who have drug dependency issues, maybe the phones are the bigger issue. I doubt the officers really have that much wish to be confronted with a whole prison going cold turkey.

      1. Alan Brown Silver badge

        Re: Solution - Netting

        "maybe the phones are the bigger issue"

        The vast majority of prisoners smuggle phones into prisons to keep in contact with the families, thanks to extortionate payphone charges and difficulty of accessing same (profiteering is too kind a term).

        Fix that and the powers-that-be could concentrate on crims who use phones in jail for more nefarious purposes.

        As for the drugs: There's a more general problem there and the driving force behind the drugs war is "profit" - when you know that a medical knockout dose of cocaine is less than 50p but can sell on the street for upwards of 50 pounds you realise there are people willing to take risks for that kind of markup.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Solution - Netting

          The vast majority of prisoners smuggle phones into prisons to keep in contact with the families, thanks to extortionate payphone charges and difficulty of accessing same (profiteering is too kind a term).

          If they don't like the unfortunate restrictions on chokey, maybe they could try going straight?

          1. Charles 9

            Re: Solution - Netting

            No, because going straight means no opportunities which means they starve and DIE. For the TRULY desperate, it's literally crime or the grave.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Solution - Netting

              For the TRULY desperate, it's literally crime or the grave.

              So, you're telling me that the near billion quid a day that the government spend on welfare is insufficient, then?

              1. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: Solution - Netting

                Regardless of the welfare situation, the ridiculous prices for prison phone are just a giveaway to whoever gets the contract to provide them. It would be like if the prison decided soda was bad because the sugar was making prisoners violent, and they now had to pay $20 for a Pepsi. The same arguments that are made for high priced phone calls could be made for Pepsi - how prison isn't supposed to be cushy, and if the prison gets a cut of the money it could help defray what the taxpayers pay.

                But when a rule causes a contraband headache those monetary savings evaporate (and then some) and you have a situation where the guys who follow the rules have the extra punishment (in the form of fewer calls with family or fewer Pepsis) and the guys who break the rules still get what they want, and the prison guards who are running the contraband or looking the other way get rich (and become subject to blackmail, leading to far worse crimes than sneaking in cell phones or soda)

                For the guys who are well behaved, let them have all the time they want on the phones. Let them make a quick one minute call (or have a call in time prescheduled) and have family members call them which should cost nothing. The prison officials know the guys who are likely to be running gangs or criminal operations on the outside, and can still watch them like a hawk and listen in to their every call. But for the rest, the more connected they are to people on the outside, the more prepared they'll be to re-enter society, and the less trouble they'll be as they won't want to risk losing phone privileges. If you catch one passing a message for someone else (you still record their calls and spot check them) then they get extra time and lose the 'free callback' privilege so likely few would be willing to do so.

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  Re: Solution - Netting

                  Regardless of the welfare situation, the ridiculous prices for prison phone are just a giveaway to whoever gets the contract to provide them

                  Good! The strong exploit the weak. That's what crime is. But it seems to me that you're wringing your hands that when the tables are turned, these poor lambs need to be treated with tenderness and kindness.

                  From my point of view, I disagree, They're in the clink to stop them committing more crime, and to restrict their liberties. If the scum don't like the conditions, maybe they should not prey on the weak in the first place. But my contempt is particularly reserved for people wringing their hands at the "ill treatment" of these felons. I WANT THEM ILL TREATED. I DON'T CARE IF THEY CAN'T PHONE THEIR MATES. Prison isn't cheap, and it doesn't reform, we all know that. So let's make sure it is punishment. I'd have the f*ckers breaking rocks for eighteen hours a day.

              2. Charles 9

                Re: Solution - Netting

                "So, you're telling me that the near billion quid a day that the government spend on welfare is insufficient, then?"

                No, because for those on the wrong side of the tracks, many were DENIED. So where do you go from there? The gaol or the grave?

                1. itzman

                  Re: Solution - Netting

                  almost no one ends up in gaol for nicking food to live on.

                  most gaol terms are for robbery with violence, at a minimum.

                  Murder, gbh, serious drug trafficking, contempt of court, these re what land you in chokey.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Details

    What was the model of quadcopter? The photo (low res unfortunately) looks like a chinese copy of the DJI Phantom... I'm thinking that if the perps spent serious money on the delivery drone, they'd be keen to get it back and would therefore hang about in the area risking capture. If it was a cheap one, they might see it as a "fire and forget" system and scarper much more quickly?

    1. werdsmith Silver badge

      Re: Details

      Looks like a quite old Blade 350QX. I don't think it would have been very easy to control or performed too well given the size of the load by the look of the bag in the photo.

      £200 or less on the used market.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Details

        That's not a blade 350qx, its a walkera DJI Phantom v1.

    2. AF

      Re: Details

      The drone in the first photo (the white one) is a DJI Phantom 4. Quite a pricey bit of kit (approx £1200 new) but mind numbingly easy to fly. As it has FPV built in, it would be easy to launch from a reasonable distance away - well out of sight - and still deliver the payload on target. The increased weight would reduce flight time but it'd only be for half the trip...

      DJI do equip their drones with a "no-fly zone" geofencing system, which aims to prevent flights over sensitive areas such as airports and prisons, however it includes the ability to "unlock" the ability to ignore the restrictions by validating an account.

    3. TwistUrCapBack

      Re: Details

      They wont care about the drone ..

      "allegedly" , 1 ounce of "spice" , the synthetic cannabis that they are all mad about at the moment, costs around £60 outside of prison, and is worth around £1600 on the inside ..

      That bundle looks like it contains around 2 ounce.

      They only need one successful drop and the profits are huge - the drone will be seen as disposable

  5. EddieD

    Pointless waste of time, in my opinion.

    Stoned prisoners are less combative than tense prisoners, and in the absence of dope, which is one of the less harmful drugs, they turn to other intoxicants.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Pointless waste of time, in my opinion.

      Yes, in fact why not just let them out, much less trouble for all the prison staff.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Pointless waste of time, in my opinion.

        So much MORE trouble for the public at large, though. Not all drugs make you mellow, and your mileage may vary. Remember there are mellow drunks and there are MEAN drunks. Similarly, a join may make most people mellow but some drugs and some people get pretty damn dangerous (like ignores PAIN dangerous).

        1. TwistUrCapBack

          Re: Pointless waste of time, in my opinion.

          Iv yet to meet a stoned person looking for a fight !!

          1. Charles 9

            Re: Pointless waste of time, in my opinion.

            I have, though. As they say, your mileage may vary.

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Operation Airborne

    I thought as a general rule, operational names were supposed not to be related to the subject.

    I guess this runs in parallel to Operation Phoneuptheass

    1. davenewman

      Re: Operation Airborne

      Operation Phoneupthearse. This is not America.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Operation Airborne

        Operation Phoneupthearse. This is not America.

        Not sure about you, but I was on about the issue of smuggling contraband in via an old donkey.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Operation Airborne

      I guess this runs in parallel to Operation Phoneuptheass

      Hang on, that strikes me as *really* the wrong place to spin up those rotor blades ..

      /confused

  7. Alister

    Police did not say exactly how they stopped the second drone.

    They parked a big black Eurocopter EC145 in it's way

    1. AndrueC Silver badge
      Joke

      They parked a big black Eurocopter EC145 in it's way

      I thought it was dangerous to operate aircraft near to flying drones.

  8. Scott Broukell

    Oh FFS!

    Just let those that want to do drugs in prison have free, regulated, very, very, very, very strong ones and see how long they last, end of. Overdose at her Majesty's pleasure all you want chaps - just sign this waver first, ta - imagine the savings - win win.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Oh FFS!

      Do you actually believe than ANY amount of weed irrespective of its strenght will kill you?

      Do you honestly believe that???

      1. Eddy Ito
        Coat

        Re: Oh FFS!

        Sure, 40 kilos dropped by a drone from 100 feet on the top of your noggin.

      2. Scott Broukell

        Re: Oh FFS!

        I'm not talking about weed alone, but, if an individual does chug on enough extremo-skunk every day they may not be physically dead, but are probably very very close to brain dead as makes no difference. But, happily, there are far more potent chemical highs available with lethal consequences in high-strength doses.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Oh FFS!

          But many druggies already have high tolerances. More drugs can just make them more violent.

      3. Lotaresco

        Re: Oh FFS!

        "Do you actually believe than ANY amount of weed irrespective of its strength (sic) will kill you?"

        Yes. THC has an LD50 of between 800 and 3000mg/kg. So it's clear that there is an amount of weed that will kill.

        1. Charles 9

          Re: Oh FFS!

          Thing is, given the average human male's weight of 80kg, and given your average joint has about 5mg of THC in it, the math seems to indicate that THC will be the least of your worries when it comes to dying on joints. Now, the impurities and so on are another matter. Plus there's always the psychotropic X-factor (which is how many stoned people tend to get into trouble--not from the joint but from the things they were doing while high).

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Thank God it's just drugs..

    .. can you imaging they manage to carry handguns in?

    If anyone develops automated defences, let me know. I know a few airports which could be interested..

    1. Charles 9

      Re: Thank God it's just drugs..

      It'd be a lot easier to toss in a salvo of shivs. Shivs are silent and a lot easier to conceal.

    2. Stoneshop
      Holmes

      Re: Thank God it's just drugs..

      A bunch of these, a Raspberry Pi with the appropriate sensors and actuators, plus a billion and a half thrown at BaE for software would solve that..

      1. Charles 9

        Re: Thank God it's just drugs..

        Don't most of these drones have cowled rotors, meaning they can resist netting? Plus if push came to shove, they'd probably start sporting cutters on top that'll help make netting fall around them.

  10. Gene Cash Silver badge

    so...

    This wasn't a test run of Amazon's delivery service?

  11. Tikimon
    Devil

    Time for Trebuchets!

    This over-reliance on technology to solve our problems has got to stop. Time for some tried-and-true medieval technology purpose-built to bypass high walls. Truck-mounted trebuchets would do a fine job of dropping packages into prisons, and can escape the area rapidly. With a fine ballistic arc and a high payload weight limit, they could rip or cut their way through any netting. There's no radio signal to jam, take over, or trace to give away the operator. Quadcopters make a furious whining sound and attract attention. The only sound an incoming catapult payload makes is the thud on impact.

    Those who forget history and all that...

    1. Alan Brown Silver badge

      Re: Time for Trebuchets!

      "Quadcopters make a furious whining sound and attract attention"

      Yes, I've been wondering about this. Moving to ducted fans would make them much quieter and probably solve parasitic blade tip loss issues.

      BTW the standard used for a military trebuchet was to throw the heads of captured soldiers back at their mates, or to toss dead/stinking carcasses into beseiged cities. Biological warfare, etc. They were never accurate enough to use as general purpose weapons.

      1. Aus Tech

        Re: Time for Trebuchets!

        "BTW the standard used for a military trebuchet was to throw the heads of captured soldiers back at their mates, or to toss dead/stinking carcasses into beseiged cities. Biological warfare"

        Like what was done in "Lord of the Rings: Return of the King" when Sauron's orcs, etc were attacking Minas Tirith. That's not biological warfare, it's psychological warfare. Biological warfare uses things like Anthrax, Potato Blight, Fowl Pest, etc. Powl Pest can wipe out Turkey populations in a very short period after being introduced to a concentrated population, like at a show.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like