Head of UK oversight body to join GCHQ 'tech help desk'*

What is she on? And what does it tell one and all about GCHQ?

After five of the "the most challenging and rewarding years with [the Interception of Communications Commissioner's Office]" Cavan stated she was proud to have worked towards "building public trust through education, transparency and accountability."

????????????? . That's a joke, right? Or is it ironic and a parody and sarcasm and a low form of wit?

No wonder traditional status quo executive admin systems and intelligence agencies are collapsing and struggling to retain and remain mainstream current power brokers whenever they spin themselves such fanciful yarns.

"building public trust through education, transparency and accountability"

And yet my first association to GCHQ is still "scary stasi snooping donut".

Do Not Call Me Surely.

Last time I felt the need to prod IOCCO Ms Cavan, after a bit of provoking for a response, informed me that I had to provide evidence of the interception of *my* communications and the harm it had done to *myself*. So basically IOCCO was and, having seen something recent, still stands as a bastion of the plethora of the UKs regulatory Chocolate Teapots.

Seems like she has gone off to be advised by others at GCHQ how to pour warm Tea, presumably with milk added to it at the brewing stage. Perhaps she has demonstrated that she is a 'safe pair of hands' who will 'rock the boat' according to instructions. Welcome to 'The Mathmos' Jo, at least Jane Fonda had more sense and went on to blow up 'The Orgasmotron'

NTAC

would it be better for me to phone them up to help me with my Windows10 problems?

Helpdesk Anagram;)

NTAC just CANT right now. Check back later.

'Cavan stated she was proud to have worked towards "building public trust through education, transparency and accountability."'

And has undone that trust - such as it is - at one move.

Tinfoil hat or no, it's all too easy to see this as a reward for several years of covering up. Trust is a matter of perception and this is all too easily seen as a reward for services rendered to one of the least publicly trusted parts of the govt.

If you don't see the problem, the solution remains a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.

Her former place of work will be seeking someone who is enthusiastic and passionate about the protection of freedoms enjoyed in the UK.

GCHQ though, surely, seek virtually anyone and everyone enthusiastic and passionate about protecting the freedoms delivered by a greater intelligence than is the norm and secretly available to suitable partners and/or special agents.

A task which they have apparently and quite transparently failed to deliver upon, considering the parlous and perilous state of national and international and internetional affairs as is presented by media outlets daily and by IT zero daily.

Is that evident failure the result of a lack of smarter intelligence in leaderships?

Spinning Doors

In short... the woman who was supposed to regulate the Intelligence Services is rewarded for her service to the Intelligence Services with a job at the Intelligence Services.

After the Phorm affair, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Monetary Penality Notices and Consents for Interceptions) Regulations 2011 were introducted, with the IoCCO given explicit responsibility for investigating instances of 'unintentional interception' by ISPs.

Yet Jo Cavan stifled every single complaint. No investigation was conducted. No penalties were imposed. No statistics have ever been published (transparency? we've heard of it).

In short, she isn't a "champion" I recognise. If you work for telcos or the Intelligence Services, YMMV.