Before or After Decapitation?
Lord Stark lost his head too because of a faulty 'enterprise' strategy is my guess.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise is to bump up the price of its infrastructure gear in Blighty from today, 25 July, blaming the crash in the value of UK sterling currency for the hike. According to sources close to the matter, the cost of servers will go up between six to seven per cent, and storage and legacy networking by circa 10 …
"HPE always carefully considers any price changes for our products and adjusts prices based on exchange rates and currency fluctuations"
Let me correct that : HPE always carefully considers any price changes for our products and rises prices based on whatever excuse can be found in exchange rates and currency fluctuations.
That's more like it.
You jest, but the UK has had a large role in the development of modern computers, from Turing, through LEO and Ferranti, all the way to ARM.
Er, which has just been bought, never mind!
Mine's the one with a RPi in the pocket, that can replace our DB servers right? >>>>>
The UK has been pretty good at producing innovative ideas in technology but they have been really poor at marketing them and capitalising on them. I think it's because of an obsessive focus in these islands (and I include where I'm based in Ireland in this problem) on investing in banks and property instead of IT, technology and developing the industrial base.
Huge amounts of academic-led research came out of the UK and just made no money for the UK economy. I would include ARM in that btw. The company is hugely valuable in terms of IP but its revenues are fairly insignificant because its licences are obviously quite cheap and it never developed its own fabrication capabilities or products and the golden goose has been sold off to the Japanese.
There's an endless list of these companies for example, take a look at what was a very thriving British telecommunication equipment business in the 1970s that no longer exists at all. You had a pretty big telecoms equipment making business and it came up with fairly innovative products that they never seemed to be able to commercialise in a way that was exportable and just got wiped out by companies that could - Ericsson, Alcatel, Siemens, Ma Bell/Western Electric, Nokia, Fujitsu, NEC etc etc.
If you look at Germany, most of these kinds of companies aggressively protect their IP, stay off the stock market specifically to avoid being run by focus on quarterly earnings and they think long term. In France, there has historically been a lot of protection and help for 'national champions' like Alcatel etc (sadly no longer the case due to a change there too.)
In the UK, it's all been build a small company, sell it off as soon as it's worth anything and never get to the stage where the products are actually developed.
I also think that it has to be remembered that while the US has been a world leader in technology, it's by no means entirely down to free market capitalism. A huge % of R&D money came in through defence spending, space programmes and so on. The trickle down into the rest of the IT sector over there was and is vast both in terms of money and knowledge build up.
But, yeah I do think it's a pity that the UK hasn't really commercialised very much IT. It's a massive lost opportunity and really says a lot about the focus of the business environment since the 1980s.
No, take it up with the 37% of the electorate who voted to advise the Government to leave the EU. Or with the Leave campaign leaders who lied to them. Or, if you're British, take it up with your MP to ensure that s/he votes against every attempt to actually trigger Brexit.