Re: Detail please
"So Java then. Just not Oracle Java."
No, the Java API, the method and class names, the code behind them that makes them work is as I said, completely independent, meaning any security issues and bugs are also completely independent.
"Who said anything about the desktop? It's very insecure without needed to be related."
You, when you said Java, i.e. the Java JVM which runs on desktops. This *is* Oracle Java yes. Not Android via Dalvik or ART.
"Erm, no. Knox is most definitely software. It might USE features like the TrustZone architecture of ARM, but it's still software."
Yes, as I said, it uses the hardware security layer (TrustZone), if you add a hardware layer but don't modify the software, how would you use the hardware layer? That software is called... Knox. Didn't you just make my point?
"No, again - IOS security is SOFTWARE based around a secure boot chain. "
You say "No, again" while again making my point. The Secure Boot Chain and Secure Enclave are hardware layers.
https://www.apple.com/business/docs/iOS_Security_Guide.pdf