back to article White House 'deeply disappointed' by Europe outlawing Silicon Valley

The US government is "deeply disappointed" by the European Court of Justice's decision to effectively kill the long-standing "safe harbor" agreement covering the flow of people's personal data across the Atlantic. Under European law, personal information on EU citizens must stay within the Continent for privacy reasons. To …

Page:

  1. Destroy All Monsters Silver badge
    Big Brother

    Bombing in 15 minutes!

    There is a clear Responsibility to Protect here. I can feel the Regime Change coming. Has anyone seen Patricia KaganNuland lately? What's that? Ordering cookies? Gods above!

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

      There is a clear Responsibility to Protect here.

      I don't think many of the commentariat understand. Which is a pity, because you're right.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

        I don't understand, but since you already have 4 upvotes, I'll go with the majority.

        btw, did you mean in the loop?

        1. BillG
          Angel

          Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

          Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore) said "By striking down the Safe Harbor Agreement, the European Union Court of Justice today called for open season against American businesses government's private data farming."

          Fixed it for ya.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

      Not so sure there's a CIA decapitation being contemplated.

      The plebs are revolting.

      Must pacify the revolting plebs.

      More Syria than Iraq.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

        "The plebs are revolting."

        Of course they are, they're not called the great unwashed for nothing you know.

    3. The Vociferous Time Waster

      Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

      Wait, doesn't the EU have WMDs and oil?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

        >Wait, doesn't the EU have WMDs and oil?

        Yup. Unlike eye rack which only had $oil. Silly eye rack.

        Won't get ANY trouble from a merca then.

      2. Col_Panek

        Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

        Well, we have to spy on y'all just to make sure.

    4. g e

      Re: Bombing in 15 minutes!

      If the EU isn't playing from the US rulebook then it's probably not a democracy so time for some 'Freedom From Above', presumably

  2. Joe User
    Mushroom

    Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

    The US government is "deeply disappointed" by the European Court of Justice's decision to effectively kill the long-standing "safe harbor" agreement covering the flow of people's personal data across the Atlantic.

    Here's a novel idea: How about abiding by the laws of the countries that you do business in?

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

      >How about abiding by the laws of the countries that you do business in?

      Then what do you have a navy for ?

      1. Joe User
        Trollface

        Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        "Then what do you have a navy for ?"

        In the past, it came in handy to rescue the Brits from the Germans....

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          In the past, it came in handy to rescue the Brits from the Germans....

          Au contraire, the RN (doing a sterling job) contained the Germans, but didn't rescue us or defeat them. And I say that as somebody proud of the fact that a great uncle served on the Grand Fleet at the Battle of Jutland.

          1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

            Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

            Sending a gunboat usually worked if the natives were being difficult

          2. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

            In the past, it came in handy to rescue the Brits from the Germans...

            It was the Russian Army rather than the American Navy who did the rescuing. Until the end of 1944 75-80% of German armed forces personnel who were killed or posted missing in action were on the Eastern Front. On D-Day in 1944, and during the next few months, more than 80% of the German army were fighting the Russians.

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Paris Hilton

              Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

              "It was the Russian Army"

              Ballcocks

              The Russians were Germanys allies - right up to the point the UK repulsed the German airfleets during the Battle OF Britain; only after giving up on invading the UK, did the Germans turn on, and attack the Russians.

              Back OT; I doubt M$s Win10,Win8.1,Win8, and Win7 data slurps are going to help the US cause in re-establishing this "Safe Harbour"; which - like most other economic treaties - only seemed to help the US side of the deal.

              Paris, the only Yank I want to find sneaking into my home.

              1. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                "The Russians were Germanys allies - right up to the point the UK repulsed the German airfleets during the Battle OF Britain; only after giving up on invading the UK, did the Germans turn on, and attack the Russians."

                There are so many mistakes in that one sentence that I can only suggest that you go away and read some proper history books. If you want less academic texts, Hastings, Schirer and Alan Clark will put you straight in about 10 volumes in total.

                However, in brief summary - following Stalin's paranoid purge of the Red Army in 1936, Russia could only appease Germany because it did not have the strength to do anything else. The UK did not repulse the Luftwaffe; it just become clear that sufficient air superiority could not be maintained for an invasion, and Hitler still hoped for peace with Britain. The whole point of the war was eventually to attack Russia to get the Ukraine, and Lebensraum for a vast German expansion eastwards.

                1. Matt Bryant Silver badge
                  FAIL

                  Re: Arnaut the Clueless Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                  "....following Stalin's paranoid purge of the Red Army in 1936, Russia could only appease Germany because it did not have the strength to do anything else..." Bollocks! Stalin had no clue as to what the Soviet forces could or couldn't do, indeed he probably had a very incorrect view given that everyone left after the purges was largely incompetent and/or too scared to tell Stalin the truth. Stalin had lowered the age of conscription, packing the Soviet Army out to 5 million by 1941, mainly poorly trained teenagers. As for doing nothing, the Soviets attacked Poland from the east in concert with the Nazis on 17th September 1939, attacked the Baltic states (as agreed with the Nazis in the Molototov-Ribbentrop Pact) and tried to conquer Finland.

                  "....The UK did not repulse the Luftwaffe; it just become clear that sufficient air superiority could not be maintained for an invasion...." So, in other words, the RAF did repulse the Luftwaffe. Just to make it clear, the Germans had the following goals for the Luftwaffe in order to go ahead with their half-baked invasion plan - 1, push the RAF from the coast back to bases north of London, so that the Kriegsmarine could operate in the Channel without RAF interference; 2, reduce RAF Fighter Command to the point where it could not interfere with Luftwaffe bombing in the Channel, so that they could dive-bomb the far superior Royal Navy instead of the RN sinking the Kriegsmarine; and 3, destroy British military installations in the south to prepare the area for the weak German invasion forces. The Luftwaffe failed in all three. The RAF were not driven out of their bases, they operated continually in the area for the duration of the Battle. The Luftwaffe bombers suffered such losses in daylight bombing even before the switch to targeting London that Goering was having to strip crews from training schools to try and keep the numbers up (which he failed to do), and the RN operated in the Channel throughout the Battle. The British Army was also well enough protected that they did not have to withdraw from the coast either. More to the point, the RAF was actually stronger by the end of the Battle whereas the Luftwaffe was weaker.

                  "....and Hitler still hoped for peace with Britain...." Hitler still hoped for a compromise with Britain as he had no actual plan for defeating the British Empire. He had cluelessly gone to war with the World's largest empire without either the military strategy or economic structure necessary to defeat it. His own generals had advised him upon waiting until at least 1942 and completely transforming the German economy to a war footing but he didn't, because he was banking on the Brits simply rolling over and giving in. When they didn't he had no option other to turn on the Soviets as he knew that Stalin's long-term plan was to let the Germans and imperial powers waste their resources fighting each other so Stalin could then invade Europe. In the end the Soviets did get half of Europe and had no intention of giving freedom to the Europeans they "liberated".

                  "....The whole point of the war was eventually to attack Russia to get the Ukraine, and Lebensraum for a vast German expansion eastwards." No. The Ukraine was the option Hitler thought would gain him support from the US and UK because it would be the result of his crusade against Communism. Hitler wanted to build an Aryan Empire but he knew just about all of the rest of the World had already been shared out between the powers, so invading the Communist Soviet Union to form his Aryan Empire didn't risk conflict with any of the other imperial powers or the US. Indeed, he reasoned they were likely to support him seeing as they had attacked the Bolsheviks in 1918 and had gone through their own Red Scares after WW1. The problem was Poland was sitting in the way of a direct invasion of Russia. Hitler assumed the Poles, who had fought the Bolsheviks to gain their freedom, would stand aside or assist him in attacking the Soviets. When the Poles demurred, Hitler stupidly sought an alliance with the Soviets to allow him to invade Poland, just to clear the way to the east. Poland had a mutual defence treaty with the UK and France, but Hitler made the miscalculation that that the Fwench and Brits would abandon the Poles and seek peace. He bargained on the Fwench not wanting to move beyond their expensive Maginot Line (he was right) and the British forces in Europe being too weak to do much alone against the Siegfried Line (again, he was right), but assumed they would then accept a truce and allow Hitler to turn his attention to the Soviets. The Allies rejected the offer which is why Hitler didn't actually order planning for the invasion of the Low Countries until October 1939. He then transformed it into a plan to knock France out of the war in the hope the British would "come to their senses". Even after Dunkirk, Britain stood firm. Hitler wasted weeks after Dunkirk waiting on a call from Churchill asking for peace, when he didn't get it he had to try and invade England to avoid a two-front war. In July 1940 his staff had already started planning "Operation Otto" for the invasion of Russia based on peace with the British Empire. The result was the half-baked "Operation Sealion" for the invasion of England, reliant on the Luftwaffe completing the goals listed above. When he lost the Battle of Britain he realised he had to strike at the Soviets before Stalin could attack him, regardless of further fighting with Britain.

                  Hitler's big mistake was attacking Poland. He could have instead routed his forces through the Ukraine from Hungary, which was already anti-Soviet and falling into the Nazi sphere in 1939. It was a harder military task but possible. An attack into the Ukraine from Hungary would have meant Poland would be an unwitting buffer between Russia and Germany and might have even been dragged into the fighting on the Axis side. Its biggest bonus would have been no conflict with the imperial powers. Hitler could even have built up his forces without the sideshow of the Italian failure in the Balkans leading to the three week delay in 1941, which actually stopped his forces capturing Moscow before the Winter of 1941. And it is highly likely the West would have tacitly approved.

                  So, no, Hitler didn't just want Lebensraum in Ukraine, he wanted an Aryan Empire without stepping on the toes of the other imperial powers. And Stalin was not some idle and placid victim, he was aggressively attacking his neighbours and intent on attacking Europe.

                  1. Anonymous Coward
                    Anonymous Coward

                    Re: Arnaut the Clueless Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                    @ Matt Bryant

                    I must commend you for that long and insightful real politic description of WWII in Europe. I thought I had a pretty good grasp of the subject but clearly there are big gaps still. In particular your explanation of why Hitler conducted his strategy the way he did, and the true importance of Poland. Thanks.

              2. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                @Ian Emery. Not everyone who helps you is your friend, but "If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons."

            2. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

              Ehmmm, it was the US and Royal Navy to bring supplies to the Russian and made them able to sustain the German invasion - without them the "mighty" Red Army would have been soon without vehicles, food and ammunitions, and would have been unable to combat. Something Russia tries to hide as much as it can.

              While the allied navy hindered Germany to get supplies by sea, especially the very needed oil, and many required strategic materials. What did the Russian navy in the Atlantic, Baltic and Pacific theatre? Nothing. After Tsushima, they were afraid of leaving their "safe harbours".... and remember, Russia waited until August 8th 1945 to declare war on Japan... one reason was to avoid the Pacific supply line cut, if Japan had taken control of the Pacific harbours.

              And it was USAAF and RAF to destroy ther German industry and supply lines (and meanwhile, the Luftwaffe...), crippling their armies power. Russia could barely bomb the front line (they had to wait to steal a B-29 and make a copy of it as the Tu-4, to have a bomber...)

              Sure, the East Front was geographically very large and that lead to a large number of casualties, but just counting the number of victims tells you very little about how a modern war is won. Moreover, Stalin was asking loudly to open a Western Front to weaken the pressure on the East one.... just, invading a continent from sea is a bit complex.

              1. Matthew Glubb

                Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                Something Russia tries to hide as much as it can

                That'll be why my grandfather just received a medal from a Russian officer for being on the Russian Convoys. I've got the video of a polite Russian from Meridian News, if you don't believe it.

                1. Anonymous Coward
                  Anonymous Coward

                  Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                  >That'll be why my grandfather just received a medal from a Russian officer for being on the Russian Convoys

                  Ushakov Medal I'd guess - Russia are really keen to ensure anyone from the Allies who served on the Arctic Convoys receives one. Most countries allowed this but for reasons I'm really not sure of, British veterans were blocked (by the British government) until 2013.

                  If you know someone (or their widow) point them at this well hidden Russian convoy website http://www.russianarcticconvoymuseum.co.uk/wp/the-ushakov-medal/ so they can get theirs.

              2. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                The Germans won every battle they fought against the Russians, they lost the war because they tried to push forward too quickly through the deep winter.

                1. Matt Bryant Silver badge
                  FAIL

                  Re: AC Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                  "The Germans won every battle they fought against the Russians...." Really? Never heard of Kursk? How about Leningrad or Stalingrad? I suggest you do a lot more reading.

            3. Matt Bryant Silver badge
              Stop

              Re: Smooth Newt Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

              "...It was the Russian Army rather than the American Navy who did the rescuing...." The Soviets were massively dependent on Western military aid and Stalin would have been beaten without it. But the Nazis did not have the economic structure to pursue a long war with the British Empire alone and would have lost in the long run even if Hitler had not decided to stab his chum Stalin in the back (just before Stalin planned to backstab Hitler). Germany did not have the resources (especially oil) or manufacturing base to beat the British Empire even with all of Europe under Nazi control, hence Hitler's need to invade Russia (particularly for the Caucasus oilfields).

          3. This post has been deleted by its author

        2. JohnMurray

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          Actually, it did nearly f-all to rescue Brits from Jerries. It did f-all until the Japs sank some of it in Pearl harbour. Oh, sorry: It sold some overpriced production-line ships to us at inflated prices on long-term lease....

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

            >Oh, sorry: It sold some overpriced production-line ships to us at inflated prices on long-term lease....

            Least they could do really - given they'd spent much of the 1930s arming the Nazis - well beyond if you look at Ford's history - even after the war when Britain had to pay for the rebuilding of all the Ford factories in Germany we'd flattened.

            1. Martin J Hooper

              Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

              Not to mention IBM helping the Nazis round up the Jews - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

            2. Amorous Cowherder
              Mushroom

              Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

              So let's see here. Who's money financed the building of the Reich and "assisted" Hitler to hold back Uncle Joe's nasty Communist horde which might have threatened capitalists and royalists? Oh yes it was the US money men. Who was one of the most fanatical Nazis on US soil? Ermmm, it was that big all round American hero Henry Ford. Who openly admitted he found HItler to be a big inspiration and that fascism was the way forward. Who practically gave engines to the Third Reich for their vehicles? Oh, it's our friend Henry Ford again! Who helped design fizzy orange drink Fanta for the Nazis little sporting festival in 1936? Oh yes, US company Coca-Cola.

              So when the whole Nazi jamboree got out of hand, who had to step in to lend us a hand? Uncle Sam! Oh and who was making money of supplying arms to the Allied armies? Oh, it's our big hearted friends the US money men again! So Uncle Sam's boys had to go to war against a fascist enemy their very own government had financed and helped.

              No it's not a pop at the US, the UK had it share of money men and Nazi friends, mostly upper class twats and royalty who were more than happy to have Hitler hold back Uncle Joe Stalin from letting his communist horde take away their birthrights. However as most sane people know, it's the small cabal of ultra rich robber barons that play with us like little pawns in the their game of "See how much bigger my pile is than yours and see how many more nobodies I can crush making it happen.".

              Fast forward 70 years and now it's simply a different kind of money men, the same US Government helping the Bezos' and Zuckerbergs of this world screw over the every day folk in their rampant greed to make the biggest pile before they pop their clogs.

              1. Matt Bryant Silver badge
                Facepalm

                Re: Amazing Blowhard Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

                "....the same US Government helping the Bezos' and Zuckerbergs of this world screw over the every day folk in their rampant greed to make the biggest pile..." I suspect a lot of that post is due to the envy you feel as you are simply not as capable at making a pile, let alone the biggest.

        3. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          In the past, it came in handy to rescue the Brits from the Germans....

          .. but only after the Brits invented the technology to help you with it ..

        4. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          "In the past, it came in handy to rescue the Brits from the Germans"

          Learn some history.

          The US supplied the RN with some crappy ships that tended to split in the middle in WW2, but most of their effort was concentrated in the Far East. it was the US that thought it was a good idea to equip aircraft carriers with teak decks (planes use a lot of petrol rather than Diesel, which is a bit of a fire hazard) thus enabling the Kamikaze to destroy carriers. The RN had far fewer carriers but with steel decks, so a friend of my father's watched as a Kamikaze hit their ship, bounced off and exploded harmlessly in the sea. Of course we had our own shipbuilding fiascos, like Warspite with its tendency to go round in circles, but it was aircraft and Enigma decryption that mostly sunk U-boats, and (despite Hollywood) a British ship that captured a Naval Enigma at sea.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

            "Of course we had our own shipbuilding fiascos"

            K-Class subs

            Wrong war but still my favourite

          2. TAJW

            Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

            Yah..some old stuff that already existed in early days until the American machine kicked in and started building. Or do you deny that the ships, planes, tanks and weapons built in the U.S. didnt turn the tide of the war? And are you saying the Americans that fought and died there should stayed home because they were useless and ineffective. Tell that to my father who was a waist gunner in a B17. He would take issue with it.

            You'd be speaking German or Russian now if they had.

        5. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          "In the past, it came in handy to rescue the Brits from the Germans...."

          Maybe you watched that film where the US Navy helped BP to break Enigma codes?

        6. Thecowking

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          JoeUser, as a long time troll and agitator, can I congratulate you on a frankly beautifully crafted move.

          It's one line and it's... well it's beautiful. You even put the troll face on and still it went and went.

          You mad, beautiful, crazy, magnificent person you. I doff my hat. I doff it and I bow.

        7. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          @Joe User

          You're not related to John Wayne are you?

        8. Stretch

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          Really? The US fleet went down in Pearl Harbour if you remember. The RN fought most of the war at sea and the Indian Army fought most of the war on land. The US sold weapons to everyone and was probably very happy with the situation in general. Now, go lose 50 Kg so you can fit on a plane and get out there and educate yourself.

        9. Wolfclaw

          Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

          At least of sailors didn't stand around waiting to get bombed in port and were up for a fight !

      2. RedneckMother
        Coat

        Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        "Then what do you have a navy for ?"

        err, lyric material for The Village People?

      3. kmac499

        Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        >How about abiding by the laws of the countries that you do business in?

        I wonder if we'll see US CEO's etc being extradited to Europe in the same way persons of interest are routinely extradited to the US.. Even when their 'offences' weren't illegal in the EU.

      4. LucreLout
        Joke

        Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        @YAAC

        Then what do you have a navy for ?

        Where else would the Rear Admiral deploy his seamen?

      5. davemcwish

        Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        "Then what do you have a navy for ?"

        Gunboat Diplomacy

      6. fruitoftheloon
        Happy

        Yet another AC: Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        Yanc,

        navies can also be rather good at intercepting weapons hidden in trawlers on their way to Ireland that were destined for terrorists, and were partly paid by folks 'collecting for the boys/cause' in certain cities of the east coast...

        The irony of this whole thing is balls-achingly hilarious, or is it just me?

        Cheers,

        jay

    2. Blank Reg

      Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

      "How about abiding by the laws of the countries that you do business in?"

      Now you're just being completely unreasonable. Laws are for companies with business plans that actually make sense. How do you expect anyone to make money with everyone on level playing field?

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

        as long as we supply the measuring instruments for making sure the level of the playing field stays on the right level, we have nothing against level playing field. In fact, we DEMAND the level playing field. Or else.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Pirate

      Re: Tantrum coming in 3, 2, 1...

      Shouldn't have told porkie pies then..

      We are prepared to work with the European Commission to address uncertainty created by the court decision...

      It's NOT really the court decision that's CREATED the uncertainty, now is it? Come on... be honest.

      ...so that the thousands of US and EU businesses that have complied in good faith with the Safe Harbor...

      It wasn't businesses that had to "comply in GOOD FAITH" with the "Safe [sic] Harbour" scam it was the US government... and we all know what your word/assurance is worth, don't we?

      ...and provided robust protection of EU citizens' privacy in accordance with the Framework's principles...

      "Protection"?!??!!!?!!! ..from the US government and its agencies... by a US corporation?!?! WTF?

      You're having a laugh, right? Name one. ONE. Disingenuous fucktard.

      ... can continue to grow the world's digital economy.

      There it is.

      You STILL demand our business (money)! Regardless!

      Jesus Christ.

Page:

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like