but....but how are they supposed to be able to legislate against porn if they can't view it? You need to be able to see and experience it to be able to recognise it
Bundestag won't reveal web block list on 'national security' grounds
Official sources in Berlin are refusing to publish details of the 100,000 websites blocked in the Bundestag, because revealing them would “endanger national security”. The block is primarily meant for the executive branch of the institution, but in practice affects all lawmakers working in the Bundestag. Following a serious …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
Tuesday 28th July 2015 17:13 GMT x 7
Sewell wasn't getting much experience at the rates he was paying. £200/night per girl? No chance, prices start around £1200/night and go up from there depending on age, nationality, prettiness, use of condoms/ size of fit/ whether she washes.
Only girls who might go for £200 would be STD-ridden Hungarian gypsies, who seem to go for the bottom end of the market - with the risk that entails. For £200/girl he's putting his life in danger.
PS - I'm not having a go at Hungarians here - simply stating a fact that in the current UK market Hungarian gypsy girls are advertised online at the budget end of the prostitution racket. Presumably their pimps force them into a high turnover / low margin economy. And they're nearly all drugged up
-
-
Tuesday 28th July 2015 14:39 GMT msknight
I believe that an exhibition on extreme pornography was set up for the not-so right honourable personages in 2008 when they were debating said backward legislation, propped up by a weak and pathetic rapid evaluation assessment (that took 3 years and complained, in its own pages, that it didn't have enough time to do the job properly) ... and only one MP took advantage of it. Perhaps this explains why the rest of them didn't need to leave their desks before voting on the CJ&I bill.
Sorry. Do I sound cynical and bitter?
-