back to article Vodafone Australia's 'doubles user traffic' on free weekend

Vodafone has unintentionally exposed the miserly behaviour of Australian mobile data users, while hyping data usage over the “free data weekend” it declared to apologise for network outages. It turns out that punters hammered the network with a stunning eight Kbps per user. The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Voda customers …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
  1. StephenH
    WTF?

    You can keep usage down on a free weekend by keeping it secret

    I'm a vodafone user and they certainly didn't contact me to tell about any free data weekend.

  2. Denarius
    Meh

    but there has to be some-one in charge

    according to the self-deluded ruling elites that cannot comprehend that sometimes things just work best if left alone. Remember this is a country that had bureaucrats waffle during the East Timor crisis that you just could not drop food out of an aircraft to starving people on the ground because there is no-one down there to manage it AFAIRC.

    Aside from that Vodfailed had such huge delays in services that I doubt the management has the courage to take any risk that might load their resource stretched systems. But a whole 8kb/s, wow, big swamp might lose some 3G customers. Now back to trying to fix the Windows mess I have with Adaware11. Why do I love Linux, even AIX sometimes, let me count the ways.

  3. RobHib
    Mushroom

    Another Australian Telecom Scandal -- And Two Days On Yet There's Only Two Posts?

    I picked this up story two days on in 'older stories' and there's still only two posts. Why?

    Frankly, I think Australian users of telecommunications services have been and remain shell-shocked. Wireless charges in Australia are nothing other than extortionate--there's simply no other way of putting it.

    Let me give you an example: two weeks ago--having temporarily misplaced my mobile phone--I borrowed a prepaid Telstra mobile from a colleague. The account balance when I started was about $14.50, I then added $20. However, unbeknownst to me, the phone's owner checked the account on-line before I added the $20, and realising the balance was low he added a further $40, so the balance was about $74.50.

    The balance of that account is now exactly $4.15. So where did $70+ go?

    I made two short calls to the phone's owner (even exaggerating, the total time can't have been more than 15 mins), and I made three calls to a client just to organise meeting times (several minutes at most for each call). As this phone doesn't log the call duration, only numbers, I can't provide exact times until I get them from my colleague when he next checks the account.

    So you think I'm exaggerating. Well, believe it or not, here's a cross-check:

    This prepaid account was opened in Feb 2011 so that makes the account about 3 years 4 months old. Now the phone does log the total outgoing talk/dialled* time since the phone SIM was first used which is :

    02:56:05 hours - - Total outgoing call time since new

    Essentially 3 hours in 40 months. Now the account is a 30-day prepaid so let's do the sums:

    Total monies paid to Telstra: $30 x 40 months ==> $1,200

    Total time in minutes (60 + 60 + 56) ==> 176 minutes

    Average price per minute of this Telstra prepaid mobile: 1200/176 ==> $6.82 / min.

    If I was Euler or Gauss and derived an optimising algorithm/ideal usage path [à la the Königsberg Bridge Problem or such] to optimise call times/versus/persons/versus duration of call etc. (such as ensuring this spare phone was handed around in such a way that the $30/month ran out exactly at the 30-day point and the recharge entered at that point), then I'd guess the cost of the call would be somewhat cheaper.

    The fact is one can't run a prepaid monthly by clockwork unless one is C-3PO, so Telstra has yuh by the short and curlies.

    Australia needs a Royal Commission into telephone pricing and how deregulation went so horribly wrong. But that will never happen. Why would it when it was the government that fucked up big time. Moreover, many of us saw it coming but were powerless to stop it.

    (PhD thesis anyone? Providing a definitive historical account and financial analysis of Australian telecommunications deregulation would have to get someone a PhD and thanks from a very grateful public -- and if you want background info I'll even give you copies of still-disputed accounts with both Telstra and Vodafone which amount to many thousands of dollars.)

    El Reg, If Vulture South wants 5-brownie points and a koala stamp, not to mention accolades for the Oz public, it could expose what's really going on behind the Great Australian Telecommunications Fraud. Perhaps we could start a fund to pay whistleblowers to get the real dope on what's going on inside these secretive phone carpetbaggers.

    ______

    * There is no internet connection on this phone and total outgoing SMSs since new is only 22, so other charges are negligible for this accounting.

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The article is quite correct, there is only 40GB of capacity inside that network. Been there.

    If there was no cap, then the pipes would be permanently clogged (as the article shows).

    I guess somebody wanted to check if the demand for bandwidth was real or not.

This topic is closed for new posts.

Other stories you might like