back to article 'Most sophisticated DDoS' ever strikes Hong Kong democracy poll

One of the largest and most sophisticated distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks has hit a controversial online democracy poll canvassing opinion on future Hong Kong elections. Over the weekend some 680,000 people cast votes in the unofficial poll that offered residents of special administrative region to highlight their …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Bronze badge
Devil

China: Enough said.

Seriously! We're not already used to China having no respect for facts or human rights? Why not?

6
0
Silver badge

Re: China: Enough said.

You're probably right but still... maybe not. There's plenty of players around who would do something like this so China would take the fall for it.

1
1
Anonymous Coward

Whu Flung dung?

Remember, this from a regime that thought nothing of running over people with tanks.

3
2
Silver badge

China agreed in 1990 that Hong Kong would be able to elect its leader by universal suffrage, but is trying to weasel out by "approving" the candidates... which sock puppet do you want to vote for?

This poll is HK's response: we want a meaningful election with a real choice of candidates.

Also worth mentioning: Udomain and Amazon were also providing services for the poll, but dropped out when the DDoS happened. Kudos to Cloudflare for handling it.

9
0
Silver badge

"Security outfit"

Security outfit CloudFlare…/

While it's true that content delivery networks have to be security aware - and they can be very cost-effective in this respect - this doesn't make them security specialists.

300 Gbps is a hell of a lot of traffic, enough to disrupt whole internet interchanges. But this is still probably only the work of some of the hordes of nationalist script kiddies in China. If the Chinese government wants to shutdown something in Hong Kong it has other options. If it wants to DDoS somewhere, it would be probably start at 300 Gbps - though attack of that size will likely get the IETF coordinating sinkholes.

0
2
Bronze badge

Re: "Security outfit"

"If the Chinese government wants to shutdown something in Hong Kong it has other options"

But they wouldn't be deniable like this one...

8
0
Bronze badge

Re: "Security outfit"

I upvoted, however, these days, they could simply send in the army ... all the soldiers would have to do is remove insignia. It worked for Putain. (excuse my French, typo intended)

1
0
Silver badge

Re: "Security outfit"

@Hans 1 - These days, the PLA is already here, (defending us against invaders?) in their barracks. They could remove their insignia and take to the streets, but the Police and/or the PLA would be expected to respond to unidentified gunmen roaming around, so really not deniable.

Beijing already has the physical power, but they promised to let HK run its internal affairs. The plan appears to be to appear to keep that promise, while fixing the elections so they have control. They can't do that if enough people say it's a sham.

2
0

Re: "Security outfit"

Actually CloudFlare are not merely a content delivery company but also have a significant security offering, especially in protecting web assets against DDoS attacks.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: "Security outfit"

They failed protecting Feedly (lots of dynamic content). How could you distinguish traffic from botnet ?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

So, this is a ballot for 'real' democracy -- allowing people to vote whether they'd like to nominate the candidates for chief executive in 2017, rather than get candidates approved by the Chinese government -- by giving people a ballot where all three proposals involve allowing the public to nominate the candidates for chief executive in 2017. So impossible to vote against. Real democracy?

0
0
Silver badge

There is an "abstain" option. The other three options are proposals by different pro-democracy groups. I suppose a pro-Beijing group could have made a proposal and demanded it should be added to the list, but they were all too busy saying (shouting outside the polling stations in some cases) the poll was "illegal". Unofficial, yes; not legally binding, yes, but Illegal? Why?

4
0
Anonymous Coward

Disable TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA ?

Do I need to disable TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA ? Undermining security of IE users ?

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.

Forums