Be careful, fanbois: Apple iThings have topped a list of the "world's most breakable gadgets". In a distinctly unscientific test, a group of testers from the insurance firm SquareTrade Europe dropped "gadgets" (although only pricey tablets and smartphones appear to have made the list) from a great height and dunked them in water …
"Most claimed on" perhaps!
Suggest you put it into a protective case?
Mine have all survived abusive handling, by my wife, who threw it at me, my children 7 and 4, drops down the stairs, on the patio and run over by a Cozy Coupe and left on top of the car drove off and landed on the drive.
Otterbox... You have saved my life.
my children 7 and 4
Those are unusual names...
OK, OK. Coat... Getting... Byeee.
The worst part is - they are twins . . .
Lemme guess, there are 9 in total?
Lemme guess, there are 9 in total?
Well, there were nine ... but I suspect it's only a matter of time before some poor kid is 'left on top of the car drove off and landed on the drive'.
I suppose if you give 'em numbers instead of names, it's less upsetting when you break 'un.
"Suggest you put it into a protective case?"
Sure, if you wanna look like a dork or retard. You just dropped $500 on the shiny, and you stick it into some butt ugly plastic case? I bet you have your sofas covered with plastic wrap, too.
Paris, because she prefers it without the plastic wrap.
Let me guess - you have an i-gadget. The clue is that you think appearance is more important than protecting the thing you just bought.
Me, I have my Note in an Otterbox Defender on my belt, my Jolla in a padded case (because I haven't found a decent belt holster yet), my camera in a case, my Kobo in a case, and my laptop lives in a laptop bag whenever it isn't being used. In addition, my car lives in a garage when it is at home, as is my bike. My sofa, on the other hand, is covered in cat-scratches.
I the rest of the report is read
It's not only based on insurance claims, drop & submersion tests (and other slightly testable things) but their analysis of the construction and materials used.
I dunno about anybody else but I would pretty much expect my phone to expire if it was submerged, and would view it as a bonus if it could do a Lazarus impersonation.
Re: I the rest of the report is read
I dropped my iPhone 5 into my koi pond's deepest point while picking out some trash. The water was cold and shoulder-deep, but I kept groping around for almost 5 minutes until I found it. It was still working. I turned it off, let it dry indoors in an airy spot for a full day, recharged it and turned it back on. That was five months ago. The phone is still working just fine. I use no protective cover at all on my iPhone 5. A cover would ruin the incredibly svelte feel of its ultra-thin, ultra-light design.
Is this really even a real test?
Surely the more important question would be, which device cover works the best at protecting your shiny gadget as most people in the know would never use said device without one.
I have a Samsung S3 with a Poetic cover and as of yet I still have been unable to damage it, despite dropping the phone many times onto hard floor, sometimes corner first, sometimes flat on the screen. Even when the drop has been enough to dislodge the phone from case the phone still comes away without a scratch... so far.
Although the reason I guess for them not doing a cover test is that one would be able to argue for lower insurance premiums if they had the top rated case by them on said device.
Re: Is this really even a real test?
The office conversation probably went like this:
Marketer: "How can I get my iShiny replaced with this year's model?"
BOFH-alike: "I suppose you could drop it, 'accidentally'-like"
Marketer: "Mmm, no, might be a bit obvious"
"BOFH-alike: I know. Let's do a survey, we can put it on the marketing budget, send it to The Register"
Marketers: "That's Brilliant!" <CRASHTINKLE>
Wrist Tether ?
I can't help thinking that a simple tether would assist the user in gravitationally induced mishaps such as the ones described. Maybe that wouldn't be 'Kool' (i wouldn't know) but it might also guard against street snatches by thieves on push bikes? I mean one only needs one hand/finger to smear the screen with, leaving the other one free to act as an anchor. I've probably missed something.
Re: Wrist Tether ?
Being able to put the thing away in your pocket without either a Houdini act or tying yourself to your trousers?
Re: Wrist Tether ?
Well the apple users could have two iDevices and have them tethered like the idiot mittens of old
Am I reading this worng ?
"In fact, the top 10 was made up solely of Samsung and Apple products - with only Motorola's flagship Moto X popping in to break up the monotony."
What about the two Asus Nexus 7 inchers ?
Surely they are also not Apple or Samsung....
Read all about it
EXCLUSIVE - Devices with large glass screen are easily broken.
in other headlines
Sun set's in the west shocker.
I had sex with my husband admits woman
Grass is green say scientists.
Re: Read all about it
CLARIFICATION - Some devices with large glass screens are MORE easily broken than others.
In other headlines,
RDF still in operation.
Fanboys still incapable of facing reality.
Apple still over priced techno jewellery.
Re: Read all about it
In other new's
Apos'trophe's s'till abu's'ed, demand equality with comma's.
Last on the list
Way down at the bottom: Nokia 3310.
Nuke? About the only 'test' they've not been subjected too.
Re: Last on the list
Nokia 3310 would probably come through that as well.
Re: Last on the list
Ah, the venerable 3310... mine is still functional after 10+ years of less than kind treatment, including a stint as a prizefighter in my upper sixth's Phone Conkers tournament and a sustained (accidental) dunking in the Ouse.
The only phone closer to my heart is my old 1100, which is almost as hardy and has a torch.
Other interesting 'experiments' to try at home...
1) Buy ten expensive cars and drive them at high speed in to a large boulder to see which one suffers most damage
2) Line up eight top of the range DSLR camera's and hit each with a 15KG splitting maul
3) Set fire to suits from a range of designers and see which one is still wearable afterwards
Re: Other interesting 'experiments' to try at home...
4) get 10 4k TV's and place in front of a toddler with a bowl of Weetabix (other brands available) to test for childproof
5) get 10,000 houses in somerset and pour 2 months of rain on them ...
See the iMitten string comment
Probably see a lot more iPads in the windows of Crack Converters when the criminals from the Met.
I also assume that they will only want white ones
As a concerned citizen, I feel it my duty to point out to our brave Boys-in-Blue that the risk of drop damage can be mitigated by using the lite version of apps on their iPads.
Industry Standard "vulture" drop test
Since there doesn't appear to be any industry standard, may I suggest that "The Register" creates one. Something like:
Vulture drop test grade 1: survives being dropped six feet onto concrete ten times starting in specified orientations. (Panasonic "Toughbook" territory).
Vulture drop test grade 2: survives the same from six feet onto vinyl flooring.
And invite manufacturers to submit devices for certification, if they dare!
Re: Industry Standard "vulture" drop test
There is actually an industry standard for impact robustness its the IK rating that nobody uses, like the IP rating for water and dustproof-ness.
There is also the US military MIL-STD-810 if your tablet was built to that standard it would be rugged indeed, like panasonic toughbooks and the dell XFR laptops.
The actual title of the server was "Gadgets you most WANT to smash"
No wonder Apple topped it.
Balance between industrial design and user responsibility
Although I'm a big fan of good design, there's an point at which responsibility for device integrity passes from the manufacturer to the consumer and -- by extension -- to third-party accessory suppliers. I suspect that a more realistic test would have included the "case + device" situation.
Personal experience: I have an iPadMini and I've housed it in both soft and solid Trexta cases. Dropped it, thrown it, spilled water on it, and tossed it into a bag filled with sharp metal bits: not a scratch on the Mini, which speaks well of the device and the cases.
>Of course, what the firm likely wants is for you to buy its insurance
Chances are you'll get your money back with interest if you do - there's a PPI style sword of Damocles hanging over AppleCare in the EU and UK in particular.
Apple do now state the UK warranty terms if you click through before purchase, but it's not prominent. An iPhone has a statutory 6 year warranty in most of the UK, but I've yet to meet an iPhone owner who knows that - and most don't believe you until you show them on the Apple site.
I assume you are referring to this page:
Which quite clearly states that under UK law, the seller assumes responsibility for defects present at the time of purchase for a period up to 6 years. However, "The burden to prove that the defect (including latent defects) existed on delivery generally shifts to the consumer after the expiry of a period of 6 months from date of delivery." So good luck with that.
Also, a smashed screen or other damage is obviously not a defect present at the point of purchase, so is not covered by warranty or statutory rights.
Applecare is extended warranty and support and now (on iPhones and iPads) gives insurance for accidental damage with a small excess - so it's actually very good value. Dunk your iPads and it may break like any other tablet but with Applecare you the excess (about £50 I think) and it's fixed / replaced - believe they cover up to 2 incidents over 2 years.
Dunk your Samsung Tab and it's probably bye bye to a few hundred quid.
Would nice if they were waterprrof - like that Sony tablet.
Pretty Darned Tough
I used to delight in skimming my iPhone 4 across my gravel driveway, then gouging at it with my keys. That was to show doubters that it was hard to break when well protected. It was protected by a Zagg invisible Shield.
My research gives top billing to the soundboard on the Underground Toys 11th Doctor's Sonic Screwdriver, rumored to quit after less than half an episode in some cases.
This research highlights an unforeseen problem with Googleglass: The need to be able to replace them when they get broken after the wearer has been hit in the face with a cricket bat.
- Crawling from the Wreckage Want a more fuel efficient car? Then redesign it – here's how
- Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
- Nobody wants to look at your boobs: Snapchat gets ads 'that interest you'
- TV Review Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
- Vid NASA eyeballs SOLAR HEAT BOMBS, MINI-TORNADOES and NANOFLARES on Sun