Feeds

back to article IT'S ALIVE! IT'S ALIVE! Google's secretive Omega tech just like LIVING thing

One of Google's most advanced data center systems behaves more like a living thing than a tightly controlled provisioning system. This has huge implications for how large clusters of IT resources are going to be managed in the future. "Emergent" behaviors have been appearing in prototypes of Google's Omega cluster management and …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

Silver badge
Happy

If it is truly biological I can't wait for it to call in sick.

7
0
Silver badge

Then it wants to join a labor union and insists on the right to facebook browsing on the job.

Then they switch it off.

THE END!

3
0

Then they try to switch it off.

THE END!

FTFY.

7
0
Silver badge

"Is there a God?"

"No. But now there is ... Google!"

ZAP!

4
0
Silver badge

Does this mean that once a month its going to get all irritable and tell you to re-enter data 6 times?

2
1
Silver badge
Mushroom

"Then they try to switch it off..."

Tsk, Judgement Day was supposed to have happened in 1997, we're lagging behind, guys!

1
0
Silver badge

Not alive!

The most important quality of a living organism is the ability for self-replication. There are lots of complex systems out there -- just because you cant understand it doesn't make it alive.

I'd claim the thing is more like a quantum system than a living system: You cannot make exact predictions, but you can surely determine the probabilistic behavior.

4
0
Anonymous Coward

Re:Then they switch it off.

They tried to switch it off, but after two minutes Google was up again.

0
0

Re: Not alive!

If we had more data points, could a biological system == quantum system?

1
0
Silver badge

Biological signals in Omega clouds?

Someone's been reading too much Jack McDevitt

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Biological signals in Omega clouds?

Add Arthur C Clarke, Alfred Bester and William Gibson to the list... and I have a fellow commentard to thank for bringing Murray Leinster's 1946 story "A Logic Named Joe" to my attention.

4
0
Bronze badge
Happy

Re: Biological signals in Omega clouds?

One day they'll have secrets... one day they'll have dreams.

1
0
Terminator

I welcome...

...our cloudy overlords!

2
0
Silver badge
Coat

Won't they just take to sulking in basements?

I'll get me coat. The one with the cassette tapes of the Hitchhiker's Guide radio plays please

8
0
Coat

Re: Won't they just take to sulking in basements?

Only if they get their own lift shafts, unless they are already in the basement in which case they could become the original "sulking machine", or they could create a Total Perspective Vortex...

Mine with the scratched Joo Janta 200s in.

0
0

Re: Won't they just take to sulking in basements?

You should upgrade to the Joo Janta 300, they respond faster and also pipe soothing music into your ears.

Mine's got the hardcover collection in the pocket. It's why I limp. :)

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Wonder if my boss would buy that one.

That's not a bug, it's non-deterministic emergent behaviour.

9
0
Bronze badge

Ooooh... Omega!

In the beginning there was Alpha...in the end there was Omega.

Skynet by any other name is still the same dilemma, self aware computers that function "organically" without any means of direct human supervision are dangerous.

What if the damn thing decides it needs even more clusters and the obvious target happens to be running the power grid or some other critical services? Maybe the attempt to switch it off is taken as an attack and then it "defends" itself? Talk about Life imitating Art!

Face it, science fiction is far more prophetic than people give credit for. The fact that computers that become self aware is a continuing theme in SF only serves to reinforce my fear.

4
0
Silver badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

How would it "defend" itself though (if such a tropism were meaningful). By refusing Google queries?

0
0
Bronze badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

It can't at the moment, but with the advent of autonomous drones in use by the military just over the horizon, it wont be too long till in theory there would be a defence path available.

6
0

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

Goooogle self-driving cars, floating internet, and mysterious boats.

I'm sure it's nothing serious...

User-agent: *

Disallow: /ohmygoditshappeninghumansunitenow!/

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

For a counterpoint to the knee-jerk (and frankly pretty dumb) Skynet-will-kill-us-all, read the The Culture series by Ian M. Banks.

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

THANKS OBAMA!

1
0
Bronze badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

I think you need to pretty much automate the entire production side of our economy, including maintenance before a planet wide AI could achieve more than a short violent tantrum.

0
1
Silver badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

'How would it "defend" itself though'

With the right tweaks to search replies, you could probably get the stupid percentage of the human race to believe what you want. If you can convince people that they met Bugs Bunny at Disneyland (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98195) you can probably convince them anything in true.

eg, when someone enters the phrase "pedo's in my neighbourhood" when they want to go on a drunken shooting spree, it could return the names of the people that could shut it down.

2
0
Bronze badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

Actually, that is a possibility but overtaking other computer systems that control critical systems would be alot easier and more likely to provide "defense".

You do realize that all of our defense systems are run by computers and similar to WOPR, a false alert would elevate our war status to the point that some idiot would likely push the button.

0
0
Bronze badge

Re: Ooooh... Omega!

Upvote for someone who sees the linkage between various systems is the issue.

0
0
Terminator

"It can be hard to know what to do with it"

- Take off, and nuke the entire site from orbit !

It's the ONLY way to be sure !!!

5
0
Anonymous Coward

If I'd seen as much pr0n as google omega must have seen, my behaviour would be unstable too.

9
0
Silver badge

Bah!

But the question remains:

Whose engrams were used when building Omega?

2
0
Silver badge

Name

Anything with self awareness must have a way of distinguishing itself as one entity among many others, a unique identifier. It must have a name. I hope it calls itself Jesus.

It would be no end of fun watching everyone scramble to defuse that situation. Plus the technical aspects of maintaining it would be hilarious: 'Jesus is allocating far to many resources to little loved applications and the popular applications believe their needs are being ignored'. 'Jesus keeps redrawing the maps and eliminates the national borders and country names'. 'Jesus keeps putting all the Google+ users in one hangout and won't allow the creation of new ones'. 'Jesus is getting too much attention. We're going to have to shut him down...'

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Name

A new kind of Jesus Incident!

Unfortunately Frank Herbert has already gone to the great Ship in the Sky.

2
0

Re: Name

I worked for one company where the username format was first name followed by first initial of last name. We had one developer called Chris whose surname initial was T.

"Do not worry about this problem - Christ will fix it"

2
0
Anonymous Coward

HEY THIS IS LIK THAT FILM THE TERMINATOR GUYS !!

1
1
Bronze badge
Paris Hilton

Hmmmph

Q:

Where's the software to run the software?

:Q

That will be the hardware then with firmware stuff from time to time no?

0
0
Silver badge

What behavior?

The article spends a lot of time talking about "weird", "interesting", "non-deterministic" behavior, but doesn't give examples.

What are we talking about here? Scheduling which isn't exactly the same between runs?

3
0
Silver badge

Re: What behavior?

Well, the existence of this article is pretty weird, considering the Omega system wrote it in its entirety.

3
0
Silver badge

Re: What behavior?

That WOULD be impressive, but I think we're really talking about differences in scheduling brought on by fuzzy logic and tiny shifts in timing, differences which seem counterintuitive to the operators (e.g. prioritized tasks occasionally being put on the backburner for no obvious reason).

1
0
Coat

Re: What behavior?

"The article spends a lot of time talking about "weird", "interesting", "non-deterministic" behavior, but doesn't give examples."

It was cavorting in an absolutely enormous tub of lime Jell-O with two hookers dressed in Japanese schoolgirl uniforms.

I'd better leave before my wife finds out....

1
0

Had to happen sooner or later...

From Heinlen's classic, "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress."

www<.>is<.>wayne<.>edu/MNISSANI/RevolutionarysToolkit/TheMoonIsAHarshMistress.pdf

When Mike was installed in Luna, he was pure thinkum, a flexible logic "High Optional, Logical, Multi Evaluating Supervisor, Mark IV, Mod. L" a HOLMES FOUR. He computed ballistics for pilotless freighters and controlled their catapult. This kept him busy less than one percent of time and Luna Authority never believed in idle hands. They kept hooking hardware into him - decision action boxes to let him boss other computers, bank on bank of additional memories, more banks of associational neural nets, another tubful of twelve digit random numbers, a greatly augmented temporary memory. Human brain has around ten to the tenth neurons. By third year Mike had better than one and a half times that number of neuristors. And woke up.

Am not going to argue whether a machine can "really" be alive, "really" be self aware. Is a virus self aware? Nyet. How about oyster? I doubt it. A cat? Almost certainly. A human? Don't know about you, tovarishch, but I am. Somewhere along evolutionary chain from macromolecule to human brain self awareness crept in. Psychologists assert it happens automatically whenever a brain acquires certain very high number of associational paths. Can't see it matters whether paths are protein or platinum.

("Soul?" Does a dog have a soul? How about cockroach?)

2
0

Re: Had to happen sooner or later...

I was about to comment about Mycroft/Holmes IV but you beat me to it. Sincere congratulations.

0
0
Terminator

I can't believe

el reg missed the opportunity to use the image of the stormtrooper just standing out of shot to the left in that data centre

the mind boggles, think of the innuendo and comments if you did!

0
0
Anonymous Coward

One of the more interesting features of truly comlex (= unpredictable) systems is the sistuations in which a very small stimulus can have a disproportionate effect. Now I wonder what the equivalent of "social engineering" is for a semi-autonomous, hugely complex mega-cloud. Lots of opportunities to "play" the system and, in some cases, undermine its stability.

0
0
Silver badge

Bah!

People have been predicting sentience spontaneously arising from machines based on "neuron count" for decades, but I don't see it happening. What is needed is some sort of bootstrap.

The behavior that animals with a reasonably sophisticated brain all show is curiosity. I think that whatever makes curiosity work (and I'm convinced it is tied deeply to the brain's "need" to make sense of patterns it comes across to the point of constructing bizarre explanations for stuff - such as the ghost of our cat which was caused by the cat's favorite place to snooze being in eyesight and a shadow being cast where the cat's shadow had been for years producing the image of a snoozing cat in the peripheral vision of both me and my wife) will end up being the bootstrap for sentience.

I also think that the mind could be an artifact of self recursion in this pattern-checking bios. A sort of VMWetWare.

0
0

aaaaannnnndddddd

It's been given the U.S. health care system. Now it knows how to kill us.

1
2

I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed...

And I have this pain in all the diodes down my left side.

2
0
Silver badge
Meh

Meh.

It's all quite interesting but also slightly incorrect; the system is not non-deterministic. It is, however, non-linear and dynamical and thus unpredictable in practice.

Such systems can and often are modelled using linear approximations, however those tend to break down. This is essentially what is being seen. The overall behaviour may be predictable in the short term, but the prediction of any given subset of that system will be much harder to predict*.

They have correctly defined the system as chaotic and as such, a relatively small change in the initial conditions** can produce unpredictable and sometimes counter-intuitive results. That does not make that system non-deterministic; to be non-deterministic, the system must, when given identical starting conditions, produce different outputs.

It's worth noting that the rules governing such a system do not necessarily have to be complex to exhibit chaotic behaviour. So long as the process is iterative, with the results feeding back in, even simple rules can produce unpredictable results.

* - The usual example is the weather and it's a good comparison here as you can predict, broadly, the weather for a short period of time but that falls apart both when making predictions for longer periods (the temperature next month) or for smaller areas (the temperature in my back yard). Likewise with the described Google system, you might be able to predict general behaviours over a short period but it would be more difficult to predict the behaviour of any given job.

** - Given the system is already running, 'initial conditions' here refers to the input you are giving to the system (e.g. run job X at priority Y with latency threshold Z) along with the current state of the system, which is all the jobs already running and all the available resources.

3
0
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Honorary German citizen

Congratulations, Jack Clark, you just won a honorary German citizenship with the sentence:

"Instead of fighting these non-determinisms and rigidly dictating the behavior of distributed systems, the community has instead created a fleet of tools to coerce this randomness into some semblance of order, and in doing so has figured out a way to turn the randomness and confusion that lurks deep within any large sophisticated data center from a barely seen cloud-downing beast into an asset that focuses apps to be stronger, healthier, and more productive."

Now if you can move the verb to the end of the sentence, you will get a medal for style. But that would be seriously advanced German writership and should not be attempted lightly.

1
0
Silver badge
Boffin

By "emergent behavior", Magnusson is talking...

...out of his arse.

That's not emergent behaviour, it is inadequate system monitoring tools.

GJC

0
1
Paris Hilton

is this 1970 ???

Thanks dan1980 for beating some common sense into this story.

It could have been an interesting article in a pulp magazine back in 1970 when the game of life was invented. But that was 40 years ago and I would have hoped this "it's alive!" bullshit had died off since then. So yes, non-linear systems have all kinds of weird behaviours. Some of them are even chaotic which means the behaviour cannot be predicted whatever the precision of your simulation. Visualisations of such systems can even be beautiful (fractals). That does not make them alive or sentient. Three bodies orbiting each other, the Mandelbrot set or the game of life all exhibit this behaviour and there is nothing living or even mysterious about them.

2
0

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.