"...you don't even need a web server to host your application."
First off, there has to be a web server involved somewhere, that is just a matter of reality (unless this starts with FTP or NNTP or some shit like that...AMZN:// ?). Depending on how you mean "server", a web server isn't just about <tags>, it can add a level of security. And what about XSS attacks? With this much dependency on JS can these be exploited even further or slicker than in the past? (I really don't know the in's and out's of XSS, so they're real questions, not rhetorical).
I guess in the end, no web server equals 1 less security risk, but also 1 less security level. So this changes nothing, well of course besides locking customers further in.
I presume they mean because an S3 bucket can be accessed via http. Therefore, as the article stated, just upload your app into an s3 bucket and set the permissions accordingly.
So a serverless web app is one which relies on a remote machine not supporting http connections?
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery? https://www.firebase.com/ (other Backend-as-a-Service startups also available)
Sounds like a perfect platform for malware!
No web server, runs in your browser, exposes lots of power to the developer...
...sounds like a perfect platform for malware! I'll bet you could deliver tons of spam or viruses from there.
- Breaking news: Google exec veep in terrifying SKY PLUNGE DRAMA
- Geek's Guide to Britain Kingston's aviation empire: From industry firsts to Airfix heroes
- Analysis Happy 2nd birthday, Windows 8 and Surface: Anatomy of a disaster
- Google CEO Larry Page gives Sundar Pichai keys to the kingdom
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? SKYPE has the HOTS for my NAKED WIFE