Symantec has claimed credit for luring a significant lump of the powerful ZeroAccess botnet into a sinkhole. ZeroAccess has been active since 2011 and is one of the largest known botnets in existence: it has upwards of 1.9 million infected computers forming its army, all remotely controlled by miscreants. This swarm of PC robots …
Is ZeroAccess like the Brain-Bug in Starship Troopers?
Presumably they will sell them back to the NSA then?
While I agree in principle with symantecs efforts here, curious as to the legal basis allowing them to take this action? disputing computer communications is surely a crime in most jurisdictions, and who are they to decide when this is an appropriate action?
Usually specific permission has to be sought from courts in order to carry out this work.
"....gained control or disabled, in other words - more than half a million bots..."
Since this is Symantec I'll just assume the word "bots" should be replaced with the phrase "home users PC's".
Re: Symantec semantics
They sold a copy of Symantec super ultra internet security centre deluxe to an infected user, now the computer is too slow to be useful as a bot.
- The land of Milk and Sammy: Free music app touted by Samsung
- 20 Freescale staff on vanished Malaysia Airlines flight MH370
- The long war on 'DRAM price fixing' is over: Claim YOUR spoils now (It's worth a few beers)
- Dell thuds down low-cost lap workstation for
cheapfrugal creatives or engineers
- NSFW vid LOHAN chap hooks up with busty stratominx in cosmic pleasure cruise