To put right the errors you mean, especially the assumption that a facebook users will agree to and terms and conditions the Zuck makes up?
Facebook postpones privacy putsch: report
Facebook will wait a little while before adopting changes to its privacy policy flagged last month. The Los Angeles Times reports that in response to hostile reaction from users The Social Network will hold off introducing new “features” that would have allowed it to use members' faces in advertisements. Users greatly dislike …
-
Friday 6th September 2013 12:26 GMT VespaBoy
huh?
I don't get it...if it is THAT obvious (and it surely is) to a) people who comment here and b) legal bods then why bother announcing something that won't / can't be implemented in the first place? oh and Facebook definitely needs to work on how it informs its users about changes in privacy. Seems nuts to me that I read about these things on The Register as opposed to say, Facebook actually communicating with me directly.
Beer 'cos it's Friday lunch time and piddling down with rain.
-
Saturday 7th September 2013 09:19 GMT Vociferous
"Dammit we're being out-eviled by NSA!"
It's like Facebook actively tries to be as in-your-face-bitch obnoxious as humanly possible. I bet they have special staff meetings to figure out new, harder and more painful ways of buggering the customers/products/cattle.
What I don't understand is that the customers/products/cattle let them get away with it. Battered wife syndrome?