That is all.
Three men have been charged with pilfering trade secrets from a Wall Street firm after two of them emailed themselves computer code belonging to their former employer from their company email accounts. Glen Cressman and Jason Vuu, both former employees of Wall Street firm Flow Traders, were each charged with unlawful duplication …
That is all.
No, the whole lot of them are money grabbing manipulators. None of them deserve any sympathy.
I see no evidence the first poster was expressing any sympathy for either nominal culprits or nominal victims. I read it more as "A curse on both your houses."
Of course... since the mishandling was not of US government information.
Even if it was sensitive data these guys are in the 'financial sector' so any hard time would likely be extremely limited anyway. We can't be locking up the
crooks experts who keep the whole wonky mess from falling over.
I still think it is wrong those Norwegians who worked out how to beat the bank systems were charged.
The banks lost but managed to get away without any liability for their errors. (Sounds like another instance).
According to Bloomberg, Vuu was aware that he was doing something illicit, because he would sometimes change the file formats of email attachments in an attempt to conceal what it was that he was sending himself.
Yeah, because it couldn't be that he just changed the extension of a file to get it past some draconian spam/malware filter.
"We detected that your attachment uses a file extension matching the filter of .* which have been blocked for security purposes. If you believe this is in error, please contact your systems administrator by email at buggeroffyouthievingbastards@localhost"
Wall St traders committing a crime... you are kidding.. next you be telling me the oil companies are in fixing prices... can't happen .. Obama tells me so...
It doesn't feel such a crime if you're surrounded by ***** who will happily screw over whole governments and populations in the name of greed and bonuses.
I agree with your point entirely, but I am tired of the self-censoring that is continuously going on here.
We're all adults, there are no kids in these forums (much too boring for them, it's all text and no titties). So, if you want to use the word asshole, let's all be adult enough to use it. And reading "f*ck" has always made me cringe. Come on, people, everyone knows what you're writing, so have the balls to write it properly or write something else entirely.
There, PC rant ended.
But to your point, yes, the self censorship stuff is fucking stupid. Sometimes it's like a bunch of school kids: "I'm tellin' on you. You said a bad word." It's just another part of language that adds color and flair to normally dry writing.
And indeed I normally show my vulgar tongue here without reserve. There is only one word which is still generally considered brutal enough to be considered socially unacceptable even in most adult company. That level of brutality was the only fitting abuse I could think of at the time for that bunch of crooked sociopathic fucking wanknut arseholes upon whom I wish only ill.
"So, if you want to use the word asshole, let's all be adult enough to use it. "
'Arsehole' has a better ring to it
'Arsehole' has a better ring to it
I see what you did there (even if you possibly didn't)
Surely if they had skills to re-purpose code then they could have....
Copied it to USB
Printed it out
Written it down
Used a screwdriver & borrowed the hard drive for a night
Used bolt cutters and borrowed the PC for the night
Surely they would have drawn less attention to their plan if they simply nicked the PC, although I recall a recent hardware burglary where the thieves de-racked hundreds of servers only to painstakingly remove every hard drive and leave them on the data hall floor. Even they weren't that stupid.
They could have always just read it and memorised it.
They can't throw you in jail for remembering stuff.
"Their algorithms and code weren't taken or used in any malicious way that damaged or compromised their financial security."
So the defence argument is that stealing is ok if it dont hurt the victim financialy?
Is stealing a car, and later leaving it somewhere legal too?
Technically yes, as then it isn't "theft" (which in English law is "to dishonestly appropriate property with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of it"). Leaving the car demonstrates your intention not to permanently deprive the owner of it. Eventually they had to bring in the offence of "taking without consent" to cover car theft/joyriding.
only if you are a Wall Street wanker
Yep, that's why there are laws for joyriding and laws for grand theft auto. Two different things.
you'd have thought they'd come up with a better name for the law rather than using the title of a contraversial computer game
Stealing a car deprives the owner of the use of it for the duration of the time it's in your possession. Since in this case they were taking a copy of the code this wouldn't apply, so there would be no harm to the owner whatsoever
They tested 'Joyriding' as the title in focus groups, but it didn't score well. People seemed to think that name failed to capture the the 'beat the hooker to death with a tire iron' aspects of game play.
Oh, they're Wall Street traders? They'll probably be charged a small fine and released back into the wild.
One has to wonder what criminal act they have committed?
Copying the program? That's civil copyright breach. Not criminal.
Running the program to guide their investments? I'd find it hard pushed to call that obtaining money by deception.
I can see plenty of civil law stuff that they could be in breach of, such as employment contracts, duty of confidentiality etc.
But where is the criminal act?
An offence under their equivalent of our Computer Misuse Act.
Based on the article it sounds like the code acquired implemented trade secrets. The crime isn't stealing the code, it's stealing the trade secret. Which is assumed to be damaging to the company and I believe is a criminal offense, just like stealing their servers outright would be.
It's been 20 years now since I was privy to a trade secret covered by a patent. Given the time period, I assume the patent is expired and I wouldn't be liable for talking about it. It was a very, very small detail. Certainly something any competitor willing to invest in a research team would have found because it was how the patent owning company found it in the first place. But common decency prohibits me from talking about it. That company is the one that spent the money on the research, they are the ones who should benefit from it.
You can have a trade secret on something, or a patent, but not both. The whole point of a patent is that you give up secrecy in return for temporary legal protection.
Trade secrets give you some protection until someone leaks it out, or figures it out independently of the company. The person leaking it out will get into trouble for leaking it out, but after that, anyone else can publish and use it, because it is no longer a secret.
Typical sociopaths. No clue they did something wrong.