The UK has launched two cyber incident response schemes geared towards helping businesses cope better with the aftermath of malware outbreaks and other hacking attacks. The schemes were launched on Tuesday by the Communications Electronics Security Group (known as CESG), the information security arm of GCHQ, and the Centre for …
If someone selected by GCHQ had just checked my computers for malware, I would be confident that malware was installed, working properly and well hidden. It would be time to throw out the lot and replace it all.
just looked at the "advice sheets" accompanying some of the
important information stuff from the govt on this, reminded me of this classic:
Next contestant, Mrs. Sybil Fawlty from Torquay. Specialist subject - the bleeding obvious.
I wouldn't let anybody who had been within a whiff of GCHQ anywhere near my servers, even people I suspected of being ex-employees. It's just asking for trouble now they've proven they and the government can't be trusted around innocent people/businesses.
If the government tried to force this crap on the tech industry I'd go abroad too.
Only in England..
Tea & sympathy with a bucket of hindsight are not what I need.
CREST = TARGET
"In the same way that SMEs look for a CORGI-certified gas fitter when they are seeking to install a gas boiler, the idea is that the CREST certifications will keep the cowboys out and help to ensure good standards in the tricky world of computer security incident response."
<pedant>Corgi is no longer the register for certified Gas and Heating engineers, that is now under the Auspices of Gas Safe.</pedant>
This does not indemnify the Engineer from being held responsible should he not notice a leak, (though he should), and s subsequent explosion takes out your dwelling. I wonder if this having this certification will mean anything other than "They look like they know what they are doing". Which is something, I suppose.
Plus, you may as well put a great big sign saying "Please Hack Me" in a suitably animated gif in the corporate website who are either providing the service, or have received the service. Plus I would put money on the service providers in question hiring decent people in the first place, show this is little more than a PR exercise. Plus, the amount of small shops who provider service for other small shops - will this really get taken on board?
My money is on this disappearing into obscurity.
Unless I have completely mis-understood the article.
Re: CREST = TARGET
All certification is "They look like they know what they are doing".
Even to some extent is accreditation - it's just a question of how much paperwork/evidence you can stack up to show that you do meet the specification.
even then accrediting bodies are at pains to point out that there may be faults with your (eg) quality system in areas that they haven't assessed.
Once again ...
HMG demonstrate their clear understanding of the internet. The only problem is, it's not in public. Or in fact clear. Indeed, "understanding" is probably stretching it too.
We would like the word 'Cyber' back.
Re: Dear Government,
See also: the BBC while you're at it.
For the record, CESG is not the "Communications Electronics Security Group" and has not been since 2002. It is the "The National Technical Authority for Information Assurance."
I don't expect anyone to advertise they have taken up the CREST response service. No-one wants to advertise "We got hacked but we used government approved people to investigate it"
To address your point about take-up of the service. It will work something like this:
1. All companies who process Government material MUST report any breaches to HMG.
2. To ensure confidentiality, those companies must use a CREST approved supplier to perform the investigation / cleanup.
3. CREST suppliers must pay CESG to have their personnel certified and renewed (As they currently do with CLAS and CHECK)
So, in short, I do not expect the scheme to flounder, I expect it to thrive. The additional costs that the company receiving the CREST service will no doubt incur will be passed on to the Government department for which they are subcontracted which, in turn, will come out of our tax pounds. It's just another way to feed our tax money into the OBN.
- Analysis iPhone 6: The final straw for Android makers eaten alive by the data parasite?
- TOR users become FBI's No.1 hacking target after legal power grab
- Vid Reg bloke zips through an iPHONE 6 queue from ZERO to 60 SECONDS
- Anal-ysis Buying memory in the iPhone 6: Like wiping your bottom with dollar bills
- Bacon-related medical breakthrough wins Ig Nobel prize