Feeds

back to article Facebook restricts ads running next to dodgy posts

Facebook has begun preventing ads from running alongside controversial material - such as sexual, graphic or violent content - posted by users of the social network. The free content ad network confirmed on Friday that it would begin protecting brands that advertise on Facebook from being displayed on pages and groups carrying …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Silver badge

So wait

if I put sexually explicit material on my facebook page I won't have to put up with ads?

*starts taking sexy pictures of self*

19
0
Silver badge

Re: So wait

Facebook - soon to be home of the Phallus-Avatar.

2
0
Bronze badge

It's like Chatroulette

But with even more dicks.

1
0
g e
Silver badge
Go

DDOS their revenue

Maybe.. just maybe

e.g. pornhub.com/contactus (I bet it doesn't even have to be a valid url, either, esp when "automated")

0
0
Silver badge
Coat

Re: So wait

So we have a choice..

pages with 'nads, or pages with ads.

7
0
Silver badge

Re: So wait

And does it work the other way around?

Can we object to dodgy ads being placed beside regular facebook updates too?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

so ....

So if i were to put some naughty words in white on white on the page, will this disable the ads ?

Perhaps an image with a misleading file name.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Maybe

Just a funny hometown name:

Six Mile Bottom

Bottisham

Penis

Twatt

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Maybe

I don't do Facebook but if I did, I'd have Shyte Brook as my hometown.

http://maps.geotastic.org/vaguely-rude-places/index.php?id=153

0
0
Silver badge
Unhappy

Re: Maybe

I seem to remember a while ago Facebook refused to let the inhabitants of Effin in Ireland say where they were from!

0
0
Bronze badge

or alternatively ABP, never see ads on FB again. Ironic, actually not more like totally predictable, that the advertisers can decide where their ads appear and the users can't decide where the advertisers ads appear

0
1
Bronze badge
Go

Brand Tarnish

It comes after a number of high-profile companies yanked their ads from the Mark Zuckerberg-run network over concerns that their brand was tarnished by the material it ran parallel to.

To my thinking the appearance of an 'ad' any which where on Facebook tarnishes that brand.

1
0
Silver badge

Um, what content?

Facebook bans filth anyway doesn't it?

Am I naive?

0
0
Silver badge
Trollface

Re: Um, what content?

Well then you've always got the controversial opinion fallback. Just end every post with a signiature like

"Hitler had some good ideas."

1
0
Bronze badge

It makes these pages sound like they have lost out.

" Page selling adult products was eligible to have ads appear on its right-hand side"

I would rather not be eligible

After all, being eligible just gives my time-line a sting of adverts for games consisting of cartoon girls with their tits out.

0
0
Silver badge

Facebook is providing a meeting place for paedophiles

Wait.... What?

Does Labour MP Helen Goodman have any evidence of this? (Besides people posting pictures of their kids?)

3
0
h3
Bronze badge

Re: Facebook is providing a meeting place for paedophiles

It is obvious it is. Graph Search is just what they need.

Now all we need is Facebook to be added to the IWF blacklist and the world could just become that little bit more pleasant to be in.

5
0
Silver badge

Re: Facebook is providing a meeting place for paedophiles

If she does have any evidence then she should be informing the IWF and relevant police organisations. Since she told Parliament (and presumably the Daily Wail) then clearly she has no evidence but didn't want to let that get in the way of her outrage.

And now I need to go clean myself after defending Facebook. Ugh.

3
0
Silver badge
Mushroom

Re: Facebook is providing a meeting place for paedophiles

And how does it compare with the Dragon track I hear on the radio, "are you old enough for love?"

Put it to music and its all ok?

0
0
Unhappy

if only the reverse were true

Why should I as a private FB user, have to put up with a continual spam of "Date this female" adverts?

I bat for the other team, but FB seem convinced I like seeing this crud on my page.

Of course even choosing the ads configuration / don't like because, and using every option from NOT INTERESTED to SEXUALLY EXPLICIT doesn't stop them. The same ads keep coming back.

Maybe FB should get off its hobby horse and give the end users what they want, direct control over the adverts they want (or don't want) up to NONE AT ALL .. of course that means the hordes of money merchantts paying for ever decreasing value stock in FB won't be happy

0
0
Bronze badge
Joke

Re: if only the reverse were true

While we're at it, this moon I acquired HAS NO STICK!

Seriously, though, all the facebook ads that I see are for dating websites, too (despite my profile showing that I am married). Given that I don't bother with "like"-ing much on facebook, it clearly doesn't know much about me, and so the default profile for "man on the internet" must be "can't get a girlfriend".

0
0
Silver badge

Re: if only the reverse were true

"Maybe FB should get off its hobby horse and give the end users what they want, direct control over the adverts they want (or don't want) up to NONE AT ALL"

You are aware that Facebook is a business, right, and that it's not somehow intrinsically evil for a business to want to make money to pay for its operations?

I mean, do you have the same complaints about, say, ASUS? "How dare they charge me MONEY for their product! It's all just to satisfy their GREEDY KKKORPORATE BACKERS ISN'T IT!! THEY DON'T ACTUALLY LIKE ME FOR ME!" etc etc...

If you don't like advertising-supported business models, well - first off, you're using one when you're reading El Reg; second, you're not advocating that FB allow an option for a pay model. You're just demanding that they give you the service for free. Facebook's intrinsic value aside - and presumably you believe it has at least some given that you use it - doesn't that strike you as somewhat unreasonable?

1
0
Anonymous Coward

What about banning inappropriate adverts next to safe content?

Will Fb ban inappropriate adverts such as credit card and gambling adverts next to content intended for teenagers? Or adverts showing guns promoting killing on police Fb pages?

Double standards. I realise adverts are allegedly chosen based on the currently logged-in user, but I have never used or been interested in credit cards, gambling or guns, so there must be a random element to the adverts displayed.

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: What about banning inappropriate adverts next to safe content?

I live in a country where the main language is not english but constantly get ads in the local lingo even though my profile states I only speak english, my browser an os are set to english too.

Just goes to show their big data analytics are total shite and ignore what you tell them.

GOogle has the same problem too on some of their other services...

0
0

So let me get this straight...

...Facebook protects brands from dodgy content, but despite claims to the contrary, doesn't protect users from dodgy brands? If I click "I find this ad offensive" on say, a gambling ad, does it stop me getting more gambling ads? Does. It. Bollocks. I know that the users are the "product" on Facebook, but this just really rubs your nose in it.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

"In order to be thorough, this review process will be manual at first"

Yeah, good luck with that. With God knows how many million users and pages, manual and thorough sound like a massive contradiction. But hey, the longer advertisers keep their ads out of FB, the less money FB gets. It's been massively overrated by investors anyway. About time that reality dawned on them.

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.