Treasury minister David Gauke assured MPs that HMRC was doing a good job of collecting all the corporation tax that multinational firms like Amazon and Google owe in the UK during a debate in the Commons yesterday. MPs including the leader of the Public Accounts Committee Labour minister Margaret Hodge and Conservative MP for …
Customer Relationship Managers?
They are supposed to be getting the taxes that are due, not running some golf club.
Re: Customer Relationship Managers?
Isn't that the scheme where they agree that Vodafone doesn't have to pay any tax in exchange for three big dinners and a Thai ladyboy prostitute?
'They are supposed to be getting the taxes that are due, not running some golf club.'
Brilliant! Quite a cosy over afternoon tea sounding arrangement isn't it?
Re: Customer Relationship Managers?
So next time they come after us, we should all demand to have a cosy chat with our CRMs.
oooh utilities - now that's much more interesting as they are rather less mobile ...
Of course they're doing a good job
HMRC are following statute, something set by the idiot politicians.
Though I'd rather they suspended/seized a company's assets rather than give them a 85% reduction in tax bill by negotiation on £6BN or whatever
HMRC chase companies for the tax they owe under the law
unlike parliamentary committees, where PMs can come up with any fanciful statements and accusations.
Why get all in a tizzy?
This business of taxing or not taxing Google, Starbucks and Amazon: it is more about PR than anything else. There are rules, the rules are designed to accommodate these big companies. Part of the reason being that they and their mates write the rules. That's it, really.
Government is part power, part services. The services include things like NHS, unemployment insurance, state education, state pensions. The things that make it worthwhile for you and me to cooperate. The other side is the power side, where powerful people and organisations use the system (and us) to further their interests, i.e. to shaft the common man. C'est la vie!
Titter ye not?
In Pay As You Earn (PAYE) HMRC offloads the work on to employers then adds another layer of management or three to make sure the unpaid (that is not paid by HMRC) employee is doing justice to the workload.
Maybe all HMRC employees should be treated similarly?
Besides, there is a convention of sorts that if someone prepays a bill then they get some preferential service apart from in HMRC.
People prepaying by PAYE (PAYE mugs?) can far worse treatment than the self assessed no?
Blase answer yet again
So we should be happy that HMRC is collecting £8 billion from companies on average for the last three years so says the MP appearing from the committee. However in response I would have expected to hear the following questions:
What proportion of the £8 billion came from companies with profits over say £200 million and in particular the group of companies that have been in the public eye?
What is HMRC's estimate of the tax loss caused by the manipulation of profits resulting in movement of profits internally within companies?
What is the £8 billion as a percentage of the total estimated loss?
Unless you know the size of the problem the value of the recovered monies is irrelevant.
If only there was some kind of forum in which the select committee could make their opinions felt. You know, some kind of chamber, in which the members wrote laws, debated them and then, having voted on them, brought those laws into force.
Hearing an MP bleat about bad tax laws without suggesting amendments to those laws is like hearing someone who's just torched your sofa complain that it's hot in here.
'We don't know about these low 'tax laws'. We just obey them! '
...Yes Mr Page but you also help write them with your easy access to No 10!
Time to amend the Taxpayer confidentiality. It cannot give a running commentary to this House on the action that it takes,"
Absolute gibberish! there is no law barring them from disclosing such information to parliment, they have made it a HMRC policy. Ask him a question and if he refuses , JSA for him.
Abolish taxpayer confidentiality - there is no good reason for it anyway.
David Gauke assured MPs that HMRC was doing a good job
Forgive me if I wont take the word of a man that thinks paying tradesmen cash in hand for work is morally wrong while he thought it was perfectly fine to fiddle his expenses.
Coming to a shop near you.
"Hello" said the assistant, "I see you are admiring our magnificent range of shiny shiny"
"Well, yes, I was looking for one in British racing green" I replied.
"Just the thing sir" as his hand flitted behind a box and pulled out a gorgeous bit of shiny shiny, tastefully finished in the colour of my choice.
"I see your prices are very reasonable"
"Come this way sir" and I was ushered to the counter.
The sales assistant reached for the phone and a few moments later was in conversation.
"Hello, this is Dave 11256AQ3"
"Yes it's 1257789 and £78.99"
He proffered the phone "If you would like to speak to our sales team in Ireland, they will complete your purchase"
Maybe a call centre in Eire, could act as seller for any number of companies that would like to compete with the international boys, for sheer cheek.
- Breaking news: Google exec veep in terrifying SKY PLUNGE DRAMA
- Geek's Guide to Britain Kingston's aviation empire: From industry firsts to Airfix heroes
- Analysis Happy 2nd birthday, Windows 8 and Surface: Anatomy of a disaster
- Google CEO Larry Page gives Sundar Pichai keys to the kingdom
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? SKYPE has the HOTS for my NAKED WIFE