Hyperoptic - a relatively new player in the UK's ISP market - confirmed today that it had received a massive cash injection of £50m from investors to help the company expand its fibre-to-the-home business. The telco, which currently offers 1 Gbit/s fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) technology to Londoners, was founded in 2010 by Boris …
I asked these guys to come to Norwich a few months ago, but sadly it seems they are London only, maybe now that may change. 1 Gbps with low latancy would mean each room in the house could stream its own HDTV channel.
Latency has no effect on TV streaming. How many people live in your house?
£50M divided by 500K homes is £100 an install. That doesn't seem likely to be achievable unless they're going exclusively for buildings with multiple households - flats.
It'll be fantastic if they can pull this off, but something about the numbers doesn't ring true - what is missing from the story?
You're not wrong, but I'll bet that there's an installation fee, just like every other provider. Another £75 per installation would swell the coffers significantly and I wouldn't be surprised if the business is expected to run at a loss for a while.
ISTR from earlier coverage that the focus was on multiple occupancy properties. That and the urban focus gives you very high densities, so I don't think that the numbers need be incorrect, although I wonder if that cost is relying on flats to be pre-equipped with suitable ducting, Cat 5 or similar.
Suburban types need not expect this outfit to come knocking on their door anytime soon, although a bit more competition may force VM and BT to up their game.
You are wrong!
They are an ISP who are charging both a monthly line rental and installation (pricing on their website).
Whilst I am sure some of the £50 Million will go on offers and the like, it certainly isn't specifically 50M divided by 500k... I am guessing most of it will go on core infrastructure/fibre to new areas.
They could always take the approach Pipex took when they invented mass market DSL broadband in the UK over a decade ago: recover (part of) the installation costs by adding it into the monthly subscription. Then don't reduce the subscription when the installation is paid off. Might work very nicely for HYPEroptic if customers stay for long enough (and why wouldn't they, if the service is good enough and the price is right, as it originally was with Pipex).
HYPEroptic seem more likely to make a success of it than former alleged 'fibre to the home via the drain' ISP, H2O Networks (see also FibreCity and their close friends CityFibre). I wonder how the SFO are getting on with their investigations:
Cone to Hull
We only have Karoo/Kingston comms, no virgin, no bt, no sky, no competition!
The great thing about London: Fibre Optic is just like rats... you never more than a few meters from one.
That means Fibre is cheap in London. Not so else where. Don't expect them to wire up your town any time soon.
Yes they prefer multi dwelling units.
Not true. I live in London and my exchange is only just about to be FTTC enabled. Even then it's by no means certain it will come to my street.
Why somebody would want such large bandwidth is beyond my understanding.
10 MB/s is sufficient for a few HD streams. Not everybody in the house will be on the internet at the same time.
Most people use BSkyB broadcast tv most of the time. Many channels and programs are repeated often.
Unless you want to download more pirate movies than you can watch then its pointless.
Hyperoptic is going to have to think of a way to keep RIAA of its back.
> "Why somebody would want such large bandwidth is beyond my understanding"...
Actually, despite more years in the industry than I really care to admit, I still find myself asking the same question, and it inevitably turns out that something appears to provide the answer "ah, that's why". LAN to the desktop? Why? 10Mb switched to the desktop? Why? 100Mb... you get the picture.
It seems to be a genuine case of if you build it, they will come. I still recall when putting video conferencing on the general (not dedicated) company LAN was considered A Big Thing, now it's pretty much taken for granted even on mobile.Yes, techniques have improved, but it's mainly the higher bandwidth at cheaper cost that drives these things. So big bandwidth - bring it on!
- Nokia: Read our Maps, Samsung – we're HERE for the Gear
- Ofcom will not probe lesbian lizard snog in new Dr Who series
- Episode 9 BOFH: The current value of our IT ASSets? Minus eleventy-seven...
- Too slow with that iPhone refresh, Apple: Android is GOBBLING up US mobile market
- Kaspersky backpedals on "done nothing wrong, nothing to fear" company article