Feeds

back to article Google erects tech specs tech specs, APIs hit the decks

Google's much-hyped Project Glass spectacles are inching closer to launch and the Chocolate Factory has released an application programming interface (API) guide and management software for the headgear. The first techno-specs, dubbed Google Glass Explorer Edition, are already rolling off the production line, the firm said in an …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

Silver badge
Thumb Up

Starting to be excited about this ...

although not in a boys toys way.

Mrs JP has MS, and it's knackered her vision (optic neuritis) making it hard to see at a distance. It's not a lens issue, so specs don't help. If these gadgets can be used to project a TV picture so it's viewable as if it were a foot from the eye as opposed to the 6-8 feet in real space, it could be a godsend.

So bring it on.

11
0
Boffin

Re: Starting to be excited about this ...

I work with a bunch of eye doctors, so I wonder how long it will be before one of them gets a set of these for "research".

It would probably be more useful to people with certain conditions, such as macular degeneration or maybe glaucoma, where they have some good, but patchy vision. People with dense cataracts, cloudy corneas, etc might have a hard time with Glass, though I'm guessing.

1
0
Gold badge

Re: Starting to be excited about this ...

I'm certainly interested.

a "25-inch high" screen seen from eight feet away.

For me it would depend on the text size. I guess they're talking about a 30" widescreen telly equivalent. I couldn't read subtitles on that from 8 feet away. So I'd be OK for icons, arrows, status lights, or very large text that covers most of the screen. Otherwise I'd be stuffed.

But then, for context, I use 5x magnification to read normal 8-12pt type. So a relatively bad case.

You could make something up with a nicer camera, or at least one with a zoom lens, and a slightly bigger display that could be excellent for me. SatNav display where I can also magnify road signs and train departure boards. I can read these if I stand close enough, but in cities they tend to be placed 20ft up in the air, so the only way to get close enough would be to carry a ladder.

Still once the tech is mainstream, it then becomes much cheaper to make up modified versions. So I have hope for shiny things to come.

1
0
JDX
Gold badge

More interested in the business angle

There must be opportunities for a smart entrepreneur to sell some pointless gimmicky use-cases to those who insist on having iPad apps developed for no reason.

1
3
Silver badge

640x360?

I think I'll wait for the HD display.

1
1
Silver badge
Happy

Re: 640x360?

HD in one eye? What's the point?

2
3
Silver badge

Re: 640x360?

Though it would not be that surprising for such a particular display, I wonder where this 640x360 is coming from? I can't see it anywhere on the web site…

EDIT: Actually, it is in the User Interface Guidelines.

0
0
Bronze badge

Re: 640x360?

I thought that, for a virtual 25" screen that's 14.4 ppi or about 2mm wide pixels. Space invaders will be awesome though.

0
2

Re: 640x360?

Think you might have done your maths wrong there - you might want to double check.

And remember that this is a pixel at an apparent distance of 8 feet, so even if your 2mm was right it wouldn't look too bad.

2
0

Re: 640x360?

Just wanted to add that there is actually a handy calculator over here: http://isthisretina.com/

By its calculation that display would be equivalent to a 'retina' display at 9 to 10 feet, so nearly there.

1
0
Bronze badge

Re: 640x360?

The screen is virtually 25" high according to the article. 360/25=14.4 pixels per inch. 1/14 inch is around 2mm therefore the screen will appear to have pixels of 2mm in size. Not sure how my maths is wrong as there aren't all that many sums involved here.

0
1

Re: 640x360?

Ah yes, sorry I read the actual Google info, rather than the Reg's fudge. It is a '25" High Definition screen', not a '25" High screen', so in usual terms the 25" should be considered the diagonal.

1
0
Bronze badge

Re: 640x360?

Ah now you're making sense. I thought it was a silly claim to be making in order to sell a product "biggest pixels ever, buy now!"

0
0
Bronze badge
Boffin

Re: 640x360?

A 25-inch diagonal on a 16:9 is 12.25 inches high, which for being 8 feet away, isn't very large. Anyway at that resolution, the virtual pixels are about 0.9 mm.

0
0
Stop

Devil's eye

still think they're not legal.

1
2
Bronze badge
FAIL

I solemnly promise

to laugh my arse off at anyone sad enough to wear these things.

5
8

Re: I solemnly promise

but when it's called an iGlass, I'm sure you'll be onboard ;)

10
1

Re: I solemnly promise

I solemnly promise...to never understand why so many people who appear to hate the march of technological progress read The Register. Shouldn't you be too busy ploughing fields with a hand held furrow or something?

When I have the spare cash I'll buy a pair. Not because I want them (which I do), nor because they represent an interesting development in technology (which they do). No, I'll do it because you won't. Promise.

22
3
Bronze badge

Re: I solemnly promise

You're being a bit fast and loose with the word "progress" there. All this is is a bunch of hardware placed in a form factor that will sell to nerds. Nobody seems to have written software, thought of use-cases or even explained why it's better than a head mounted camera. They will probably sell a few to geeks but until it offers a real advantage, the normal people will stay away. This is why most normal people think Apple invented smartphones - they were the ones who thought about the uses, they put maps in and made them easy to use. Others failed before them because they just put a load of tech in a box and let people write their own software.

2
6
Bronze badge
Mushroom

Re: I solemnly promise

Fuck you, I'm not a luddite. Agreed, they are an interesting new technological development. But just because you *can* do something doesn't mean you *should*.

While your bluster about brave new worlds sounds ok on the register, I'm just realistic enough to be able to guess what the reaction of the average person will be to a person with a head mounted computer & camera walking into their shop/office/pub. What's he doing with that thing? filming me? watching porn? You'll be a lonely person wearing those things.

It's bad enough socialising with people drifting in and out of conversations because of text messages, if I find myself stuck talking to someone who is obviously not paying attention because they're reading a facebook update on their glasses, I'm going to be sorely tempted to snatch them and stamp on the wretched things.

4
2
Silver badge

Re: I solemnly promise

" ... ploughing fields with a hand held furrow or something?"

Close, but no harvest for you.

2
0
Gold badge
Happy

Re: I solemnly promise

Remember, all you need to do is say slowly, loudly and clearly, "Safe Search Off. Search horse-porn."

To steal a silly idea for a Microsoftie.

5
0
Silver badge
Meh

Re: I solemnly promise

I have to wonder if objections will arise on the grounds of security (is a Glass user walking around filming stuff that would make the locals feel edgy?) or just social graces (Is this guy filming me while we are eating lunch together, or taking in a general bar scene?).

And unfortunately, at least a few pervs out there will start using these to surreptitously film their inamoratas.....

Will Google be asked to put some kind of glowing red "on air" light on these so you can see when someone is filming or taking pics?

2
0
Gold badge

Re: I solemnly promise

Isn't the law in Japan that all phones have to make a loud 'shutter noise', to alert women of upskirt photos? I've no idea if they have a similar warning noise for video though.

0
0
Silver badge

Sounds a bit expensive

If I wanted to become a creepy person that no one wanted to talk to, I can think of cheaper ways of going about it than buying these glasses. Since that's the effect they'll confer on the wearer.

3
5

Re: Sounds a bit expensive

$1500 was the pre-pre-release figure for the especially eager user.

My biggest concern is that you have to have an android device to make any use of it; Which will bump the cost up for me, as I don't currently have one!

0
0
Gold badge
Coat

Re: Sounds a bit expensive

Let me fix that:

"$1500 was the pre-pre-release figure for the especially eager usersad git."

4
9
Silver badge

Re: Sounds a bit expensive

I'm waiting for the carved-from-gold-block, diamond encrusted ones. You know it will happen.

Alternatively, if someone could make some imitation 'Glass', then I could wear them so that people leave me alone. If anyone does start to bother or bore me, I could adopt a startled look and say, "Korea just launched a nuclear missile; I'm going home and suggest you do too."

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Sounds a bit expensive

..such as becoming "Obviously!", perhaps?

0
0
Thumb Up

I can't help but get a little bit excited about these, purely for gaming. Sure the HUD option is the next logic step to headset and mic, and could offer some really interesting possibilities.

Not sure I'd want to use them out of the house. Pretty easy target for the tea leaves I'd imagine

1
0

This post has been deleted by a moderator

This post has been deleted by a moderator

Thumb Up

Nice headline.

Reading through the "getting started" guide, it does sound like a fun device...

Can I call dibs on the use of "Glass Actions" to describe the people suing Google when they start walking into lamp posts while reading their tweets?

6
0
Happy

Re: Nice headline.

Loved the headline! Not quite as concise as "Sticks nix hick pix", but how often do you see an 80-year-old cultural allusion?

0
0
Bronze badge

The thing I find funny is the number of people who say it will make people look creepy - and yet - people wearing bluetooth handsfree thingies who often look like they are muttering away to themselves walking down the street have largely been accepted nowadays. Prediction - Glass users will become accepted - it's not like we are going to have a choice - not when Google aren't the only company developing said technology and especially not when Apple inevitably realise they are missing a new market and jump on board.

3
0

And if I already wear normal glasses?

I wear regular glasses, and don't particularly care for contact lenses. Will these high tech specs be compatible with my "dumb glasses" that I wear everyday? Will I be able to get them with prescription lenses, or perhaps something that can attach to a normal pair of glasses? I can't be alone in the potential market for such a device, as glasses wearing seems to be quite prominent in the geekery community.

2
0
Bronze badge

Re: And if I already wear normal glasses?

Bear in mind this is just the first version, for early adopters and developers. i.e. what about people that can't use their right eye?

I expect later there will be more versions, smaller, that could then potentially either hold prescription lenses, or be clip on.

0
0
FAIL

Re: And if I already wear normal glasses?

You do know this isn't actually a pair of glasses right? It is just a display that sits in your field of view.

Of course there will be issues about using it in conjunction with other headgear, but hopefully there will be options that address this when it goes mass-market.

1
0
Bronze badge

Re: And if I already wear normal glasses?

IIRC Google said something about the non-"HUD" part being capabel of accepting prescription glasses instead of the window glass in the base model

0
0
Coat

Re: And if I already wear normal glasses?

you can write an app that takes a video feed from where you are looking at, and put it right in front of your eyes (hummm, your eye), so you don't need prescription lenses anymore.

0
0
Gold badge

Re: And if I already wear normal glasses?

Nuno,

That's not much good if you need prescription lenses in order to be able to see the HUD though.

0
0
Bronze badge
WTF?

Play store: This item cannot be installed in your device's country!

I hope no one in the UK bought these glasses, as Google seem to have restricted access to the UK, and presumably other countries!

Presumably US users only then :-(

0
0
TJ1
WTF?

... you may not use the APIs for any activities ...

"Except as specifically licensed by Google, you may not use the APIs for any activities ..."

Errr, didn't Google recently win a minor court case (*subject to appeals) in the USA where the plaintiff (Oracle) was claiming that APIs are copyrightable.

If APIs are not copyrightable, as the court found, then on what basis can Google license use of an API?

See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/31/no_copyright_java_api/

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: ... you may not use the APIs for any activities ...

No relation. The first case is about copying an API and re-implementing it. The other is about using an API available to developers to interact with a device.

0
0

Friendly warning...

The difference in focal point depth between the normal eye and the info on the glass in the other eye will make some of you puke your guts out. Caveat emptor.

1
0
Terminator

Re: Friendly warning...

There's no way your average human will be able to focus on something 1 inch from their eye (try it!).

So I suspect the HUD will do some lensy blurry magic (*) so that the image appears to be somewhat further back. Maybe not 8ft though...

(*) technical term, used by those of us who have no real idea about the optics.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Friendly warning...

I always wondered why some people reacted that way to rapidly decreasing or increasing their eye's focal point.

0
0

Re: Friendly warning...

Human eyesight is stereoscopic. The brain has evolved to take input from 2 eyes on on focal point and turn it in to brain electrickery. When this mechanism is fiddled with, the brain continues to try and make sense of it but fails miserably.

It's one of the reasons trainee pilots flying the Apache get very sickly indeed. Some of them never get used to it and have to drop out of the training programme.

0
0
Pint

Might be useful ...

Can I overlay an image of Kylie when I'm "entertaining" the missus?

1
0
Gold badge
Happy

Re: Might be useful ...

Only if she can have a pair that overlay an image of Jason over you...

3
0

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.