Amazon has slashed the cost of DynamoDB as the cloud giant passes on operational savings to customers. The price cut was announced by Amazon on Thursday, and sees dramatic reductions in provisioned throughput costs, along with the price of indexed storage. "Rapid adoption has allowed us to benefit from the scale economies …
I don't use this particular service but for me AWS generally wins. It's got rough edges but they've got everything covered. If I wanted to run a highly scalable web application then I could easily host parts of it with other providers but I would probably still end up using a particular AWS service somewhere in the pipeline. And if I need one AWS service then I may as well use six. It turns out their pricing is highly competitive and the service I've experienced is well within the tolerances I would expect for the money. You literally pay for what you get. For smaller stuff it's still probably cheaper to colo or host it yourself but for projects where you need the potential to scale every aspect, then AWS is great.
I don't really understand what VMWare are complaining about. What are VMWare's object storage rates or DNS failover charges? They're offering a product which allows a provider to theoretically offer similar services to AWS. Amazon pumps it right into the end developer's face with a standard API. Wish the official docs were better though.
Azure has faster storage, faster average CPU performance and a more mature / capable database stack though for a similar cost. It depends what you want...
- Mounties always get their man: Heartbleed 'hacker', 19, CUFFED
- Analysis Oh no, Joe: WinPhone users already griping over 8.1 mega-update
- AMD demos 'Berlin' Opteron, world's first heterogeneous system architecture server chip
- Leaked pics show EMBIGGENED iPhone 6 screen
- OK, we get the message, Microsoft: Windows Defender splats 1000s of WinXP, Server 2k3 PCs