Microsoft claims that Windows Server 2012 is the "Cloud OS", but is that a serious statement or just marketing hype? We know that thousands of you who are Windows Server users are planning to migrate to private cloud in 2013, so the answer matters as much to you as it does to us. Join The Reg's Tim Phillips for a live discussion …
And again, many people will missunderstand the title
While it was probably meant as "Why Windows Server 2012 is better than other Windows Servers", and probably meant to be something close to a marketing blurb, many people will read it as "Why Windows Server 2012 is better than something unixoid" and start complaining about that.
Those are different markets. People considering WS 2012 would probably never run a Debian, and people running Debian would probably never touch WS 2012 except for legacy applications.
Is 'Cloud OS' the new term for 'vapourware'?
Server 2012 is here....
No it's here now. The full product, with everything - shared nothing clustering and live migration - distributed networking, replication, automation, etc. Everything you need for a private cloud in fact - as I am busy designing and building right now for a busy trading floor environment with ~700 servers behind it - all moving onto Hyper-V.
One day, we're going to really, really regret this whole cloud thing.
- Nokia: Read our Maps, Samsung – we're HERE for the Gear
- Ofcom will not probe lesbian lizard snog in new Dr Who series
- Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
- Too slow with that iPhone refresh, Apple: Android is GOBBLING up US mobile market
- Episode 9 BOFH: The current value of our IT ASSets? Minus eleventy-seven...