back to article Electric cars stall in USA, Australia

Better Place, the electric car outfit founded by spurned SAP CEO aspirant Shai Agassi, has walked away from projects in the USA and Australia, to “focus on delivering on its strategy in Denmark and Israel, where the complete infrastructure is in place and commercial operations are fully underway,” Better Place's electric car …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

Silver badge
FAIL

utter bollocks

This battery swapping idea is utter bollocks, the kind of idea that sees a sledgehammer used to break an egg, an idea which would be so wasteful and restrictive that it would send thousands of people down a path of enormous cost, lack of flexibility, and ultimately loss of their investment. An idea born of corporate types with little imagination but lots of contacts and hype. An idea that, by consuming such vast resources and delivering such a disastrous and ridiculous model, would probably set back the development of viable electric cars for many years. Thank goodness they've had to pull out of these two big markets. They can now focus on selling their bullshit to two small countries where that particular product is rife.

14
14
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Re: utter bollocks

Wot 'e said.

3
3
WTF?

Re: utter bollocks

Ummm, are you thinking that the used batteries get thrown away - i.e. they're used once? I don't think they're using lots of Duracells, but big battery packs that get removed, swapped and then recharged at the swap station, to be swapped for the empty battery o fthe next car that comes in. The only overhead that this would have over a 'conventional' recharging station is the battery-swapping facility.

Or was this just a ill-informed rant at electric cars in general?

7
7
Silver badge
WTF?

Re: utter bollocks

"This battery swapping idea is utter bollocks....." Actually, the idea is rather good as it removes one of the biggest practical problems of having an electric car, namely the time off the road needed to charge the batteries. But battery swaps bring their own commercial issues in that the need all the cars using them to have identical battery packs, which means if you want to increase your appeal you have to share your tech with other manufacturers, or you have to shoulder all the costs of supporting your customers over the whole target country. That also means you have to invest in a stock of spare battery packs for each charging station, the charging stations themselves, etc. Very costly unless you unload some of the cost by sharing with other companies or by using facilities and distribution chains already in place such as the existing network of petrol stations. For small countries like Israel not too big a commercial problem, but for massive countries like Oz or the States it would be a commercial killer without massive government subsidies.

Me, I'm all for corn-oil-fuelled electro-diesel hybrids. The tech is already available, I can buy the corn oil from any supermarket and it is much cheaper than diesel anyway, even after adding on the HMRC surcharge for using it as fuel rather than a food product. I get all the flexibility of a normal car because it is a normal car. All you have to deal with is the rabid Greenpecker fanatics insisting I'm somehow stealing food from the Third World (though they can never explain coherently how).

9
2
Anonymous Coward

Re: utter bollocks

I can hardly believe it, I've just upvoted a Matt Bryant post.

I do see one reason battery swapping might get traction, though. It's easier to tax than electricity used in a plug-in @home.

4
0
Silver badge

Re: utter bollocks

No I was not.

2
2

Re: utter bollocks

"Me, I'm all for corn-oil-fuelled electro-diesel hybrids."

Unfortunately that means you're also for third-world starvation.

Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price means they are just too expensive for the poor in developing countries, plus it means areas of wilderness are destroyed to make new farmland for fuel.

Some kind of sustainable diesel, sure totally with you, but food-based fuel is a disaster outside the western world unfortunately...

11
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: utter bollocks

> All you have to deal with is the rabid Greenpecker fanatics insisting I'm somehow stealing food

> from the Third World (though they can never explain coherently how).

Perhaps because you're conveniently ignoring the demonstrable price rise in corn, i.e. maize – along with most foods, including beef, because corn is a primary feedstock for cattle in the US – that occurs when large quantities of corn are diverted into industrial scale production of ethanol and biodiesel.

And when you can sell your Mexican corn for more in the US than in Mexico, guess what happens to the supply of corn in Mexico? Anyone who has ever taken a uni Econ course knows what happens to prices when there is scarcity. And for some reason poor people have more difficulty handing the price of their dietary staple doubling or tripling than the wealthy do. I hope I don't need to explain why that is.

There, explained. Coherently too I'd claim. If you don't grok that, you might consider upping your meds.

10
2
Thumb Down

Re: utter bollocks @Steve1

I'd guess that the typical small gas/petrol station on this side of pond serves 100-200 customers a day. A high volume station on a major highway maybe 1000+.

If every car was a hot swap battery electric, you'd need a warehouse for the batteries that are charging and charged. And I don't know, you'd probably need 2x or 3x batteries in stock to cover the time it takes to recharge.

I'll just wait for the ultra-caps, although it seems like not much effort is being put into developing those.

2
2
Bronze badge
FAIL

Re: utter bollocks

" I get all the flexibility of a normal car because it is a normal car. All you have to deal with is the rabid Greenpecker fanatics insisting I'm somehow stealing food from the Third World (though they can never explain coherently how)."

It's more likely that people will point out to you that there isn't enough arable land to produce the quantities of "corn-oil fuel" that would be required if everyone switched to your utopian dream of a "Crisp 'n' Dry" fueled transport system.

7
2

Re: utter bollocks

Battery swap is a great idea but it demonstrates the folly of electric battery power: cost.

Electricity is almost free but wear and tear on the battery is on par with hydrocarbon combustion. BetterPlace is apparently ashamed of their pricing structure, I couldn't find it on their site. Other sources suggest 399 euro/mo is the going price in Denmark for a battery swap subscription. About $540/mo. My Prius fuel costs are about $7000/year for 9,000 miles in the USA. EV can not compete with those economics.

They say with production of the Nissan Leaf moving to Tennessee and the $7500 Federal bribe, effective cost of a new Leaf will be in the $22k range. That could get American's interest as a 2nd vehicle, but not as primary for nearly as many.

1
0
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: Chet Mannly Re: utter bollocks

".....Unfortunately that means you're also for third-world starvation....." Sorry, but that's just alarmist nonsense. Go look at the price of a bottle of vegetable oil in your local supermarket, if there was some World shortage it would be much higher. Currently, in Europe, we spend a rediculous amount on food mountains and wine lakes via EU subsidies, so there is already an excess. If we all switched overnight there would be problems, true, but a phased approach would give plenty of time for the market to build up production to meet demand. That's simple supply-and-demand economics. It worked in Brazil just fine with their ethanol petrol projects, and I don't remember any news items on Brazil running out of land or people starving to death. The US produces massive excesses of wheat which could be similarly used, and at the same time boost both the farming and chemical sectors in the US, giving an added bonus to reducing dependence on foreign oil. This rediculous idea that there is not enough arable land just silly seeing as we have already passed that point when we introduced artificial nitrogen fertilisers. Hydroponics offers even more scope.

".....Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price means they are just too expensive for the poor in developing countries...." Actually it would allow many Third World countries to push up foreign earnings as suddenly farming would be much more lucrative. For example, in coutries like Zimbabwe it would mean large farms cleared for cattle could instead be used for corn or wheat. But of course, any idea of helping farmers anywhere is treated by the city-dwelling Greenpeckers as verboten as they all hate farmers, whether they be riding tractors in the wolds or living in the Third World.

1
3
Silver badge
Facepalm

Re: AC Re: utter bollocks

"....There, explained. Coherently too I'd claim...." Sorry, but you did was repeat a load of alarmist FUD. Please supply some verifiable facts to back up your "I belaive this will happen" scenario. Those of us that make decisions based on logic are not going to be swung by hyperbole and melodramatics.

1
5
Silver badge
Stop

Re: Dr_N Re: utter bollocks

".....there isn't enough arable land to produce the quantities of "corn-oil fuel" that would be required...." Sorry, but that is claptrap of the highest order. Unless you can support it with some figures, which no Greenpecker ever can. Artificial nitrogen fertilisers and hydroponics rendered that fairytale a joke long ago.

1
6
Anonymous Coward

Re: AC utter bollocks

Oh, you think it's alarmist FUD? Why research the facts yourself when you can stand on a barrel and spout nonsense. But since you're so helpless, let me google that for you:

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1717572,00.html

https://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/25-11

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-carlsen/nafta-is-starving-mexico_b_1067761.html

http://www.good.is/posts/food-price-watch-riots-in-algeria-mexican-government-buys-maize-futures

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10699716

and that's just the start. So yeah, go ahead, keep your head in the sand.

4
2
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: AC Re: AC utter bollocks

"....But since you're so helpless, let me google that for you....." The problem is you Googled you just didn't bother READING the subject matter. The majority of those articles are about countries with existing political problems leading to lack of food or the food prices of staples being driven up, not one is about the impact of crop-based fuels. The one article you obviously didn't bother to read was the last, from the NZ Herald, which does have a passing comment on using all spare US wheat to feed the Third World rather than using 25% for ethanol, quote: "If all the food in the world were shared out evenly, there would be enough to go around....."

Further down this article is a very telling comment - "....if more African land was brought into production...." - revealing that the real issue is not the lack of arable land but the cr*p state of many Third World countries, their governments and their policies. I know the standard mantra for Greenpeckers faced with that truth is to blame it all on Western capitalism but that doesn't remove the fact we have EXCESS food in the West.

All you are doing is repeating the usual Greenpecker socialist shrieking and trying to apply it to a completely differernt scenario. Those countries would be knee-deep in the brown stuff whether we in teh West were using crops for biodiesel or burning kittens for heating. Go away and READ up on the subject.

3
4
Silver badge

Re: the idea is rather good as

You were doing rather well until you slipped on the corn oil and fell flat on your face.

To the first paragraph I would add that if properly structured, such a system might remove one of the other major bugaboos for electric car buyers: the huge cost of battery replacement when they die before you are done paying for the car. You could do the quality checks at the recharging stations and remove the failing batteries there and distribute the replacement cost amongst all the users.

I doubt it would be enough for me to personally give up my fossil fuel burner, but it might make it more palatable for some. In fact, it is the biggest objection my roommate has to buying a hybrid, and a pure electric car simply wouldn't work for her. She makes an 8 hour drive to see her mother on a somewhat regular basis. In fact, I'm not even sure she'd be able to get TO work in one, let alone return without recharging.

3
0
Silver badge

Re: Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price

Now that's utter bullocks.

I don't object in principle to using food stuffs for fuel instead of fossil things. It's just that corn and its various derivatives are totally inefficient. I hate communist greenies with a passion, but if there were an efficient food based alternative that cost about the same as a tank of gas I'd use it. And no, that doesn't mean you just need to jack up the taxes to make the food alternative "cost effective" to me. It has to do that without government intervention.

1
0
Silver badge

Matt, you want Rape

The veg oil you see in the supermarket is Rapeseed oil, not corn oil.

Rape grows plentifully and is not a staple food of anybody (except possibly the Scottish), and it's dirt-cheap too boot.

Many parts of the UK countryside are wrapped in the wonderful yellow of rape already, and given that we're supposed to be cutting down on frying with it, driving on it instead sounds like a good idea to me.

1
1
Silver badge
Flame

Re: utter bollocks @Steve1

I'd guess that the typical small gas/petrol station on this side of pond serves 100-200 customers a day. A high volume station on a major highway maybe 1000+."

Bearing in mind the range of a fully charged battery compared to the range of a tank of Diesel, you can multiply those filling station visits by a factor of between 5 and 8. Depends on what/how/where you drive, of course. Personally, I can get 700+ miles from a 55 litre tank of Diesel. Electric cars get up to 100 miles on a battery pack.

1
0
Silver badge
Boffin

Re: Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price

"...... It's just that corn and its various derivatives are totally inefficient......" Whilst vegetable oil is less efficient per litre/gallon than proper diesel, it makes up for it in cash savings here in the UK. Sorry if you are not UK based, but here the price of motor fuel is ridiculous due to a taxation mechanism that was supposed to drive down car sue age and hence pollution. In the UK over 60% of the price of a gallon of fuel is tax, which is why you will see British tourists in the States weeping when they see the prices there.

However, older diesel engines with pre-rail-injector designs can burn thicker veggie oil with very little or no modification very well. And an added bonus is your car actually smells like a chippie rather than a smog machine. Because the oil (usually corn oil) is not being taxed as fuel oil it is very, very cheap compared to diesel. Now, HMRC hate losing any money, so you are obliged to declare how much untaxed oil you are using as fuel and pay an excise duty on it, a process called "making an entry", but it still works out very cheap compared to diesel, even with the economy disadvantage of older diesel engines compared to more modern ones.

Indeed, in the UK the whole idea took off due to an artificial fuel shortage: http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/features/eco/biofuel.html

1
1
Bronze badge

Re: Dr_N utter bollocks

"Sorry, but that is claptrap of the highest order. Unless you can support it with some figures, "

It's YOUR utopian dream You do the freakin' math.

I'm just off out for a spin in my turbo-charged petrol engined car.

Why? Because I CAN: It's not some half-arsed pipe dream.

1
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Chet Mannly utter bollocks

"Go look at the price of a bottle of vegetable oil in your local supermarket"

The price of vegetable oil is as it is because currently it is mostly only used in food production. The world currently consumes over 93 million barrels of oil per day. In western countries between 50 and 70% of this is used for personal transport. It doesn't take a genius to see that if everyone switches to running their vehicles on vegetable oil or vegetable derived ethanol then the prices of vegetable products (and consequently meat products) will increase markedly.

3
1
Silver badge
Facepalm

Re: AC Re: Chet Mannly utter bollocks

"....The price of vegetable oil is as it is because currently it is mostly only used in food production. The world currently consumes over 93 million barrels of oil per day. In western countries between 50 and 70% of this is used for personal transport. It doesn't take a genius to see that if everyone switches to running their vehicles on vegetable oil or vegetable derived ethanol then the prices of vegetable products (and consequently meat products) will increase markedly...." Your argument is one sided, you simply provide the figures for daily consumption of oil, then insist that it is impossible to meet through vegetable oils without providing any actual argument to support your insistence. You also do not provide a case for your rise in food prices, but the example of Brazil undermines your argument completely. And that's before we start looking at possible additional sources of food (fish farms, which do not need arable land) and vegetable oils (seaweed, ditto). You are obviously not the genius you mentioned.

0
3
Silver badge

Re: utter bollocks

"and it is much cheaper than diesel anyway,"

I doubt that. A quick google got me 15L for £24.99 which is more than the price of diesel in these parts at the pump.

Have you a ref.for this cheap oil ?

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: utter bollocks

"I can hardly believe it, I've just upvoted a Matt Bryant post."

Your cognitive dissonance will be relieved by adopting my tried and tested system, which is to downvote any of Matt's posts without even reading it. There's a very small chance that you might be unjust with his first contribution in a thread, but after that you're guaranteed that he deserves it.

1
1
Silver badge

It's the land, not just the crop

Land planted with rape cannot be planted with food crops. Therefore growing rape does impact on the supply of others.

2
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price

I guess you didn't notice the price hike in veg oil a few years back. Veg oil in most supermarkets costs over £1 a litre so it's not such a great saving.

Also you'll find that the UK Govt. allows you to make something like 10k litres of bio-diesel a year tax free.

Also with so councils and companies moving their fleets to bio-diesel I wonder how many local fish n chip shops have used oil to give away these days.

So unless you're really into fried food and you collect all your own used cooking oil, using veg oil to power your diesel isn't such great savings.

Still I guess every penny counts.

0
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: AC Chet Mannly utter bollocks

You're like those idiots that watch salvage hunters etc and think that it's possible to go out there and make loads of money from other peoples tat.

Or those fools that bought houses in the UK at the height of the market ignorant of the wider context and thinking that because people need somewhere to live prices were always going to go up.

Sure a few people can and do make money from it ... but the reality is that it relies upon less rather than more for it to remain profitable for the few. Of course, those involved in the auction business would rather more people as it makes them more money.

The reality of markets is that if you make a change it has an effect ... unfortunately you seem unwilling to appreciate the potential dangers preferring to believe that the world is full of spare capacity that we're just not using properly.

BTW - Fish farms require food to feed the fish (not to mention chemicals and drugs to combat the unhealthy conditions that come from overcrowding) and while we're at it we seem to be having problems over fishing already, you do realise that fish food is generally just ground up fish don't you? or did you think that fish just drink water and grow like magic?

As for seaweed oil, I'll believe in it's long term viability probably at about the same time I see cold fusion working.

0
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: AC AC utter bollocks

Lets get one thing straight.

The world is a messed up place, and it is beyond doubtful that a move to bio-diesel will somehow make everyone happy sharing non-violent individuals. So lets stick with the real world.

It's rather strange that you call people Greenpeckers and show a disdain for Socialists, and yet here you are implying that we could/should share out all the food evenly. "If all the food in the world were shared out evenly, there would be enough to go around....."

Of course the intelligent capitalists and savvy socialists among us will quickly realise that the whole point of capitalism is making money from inequalities in supply and demand. Some companies even go to the trouble of artificially limiting supply so as to attain a better return on investment. So what makes you think that the agriculture industry isn't interested in ROI? Likewise you mention overproduction, but fail to appreciate it's causes and lets not even approach the subject of land suitability.

Seems to me that you're a closet Socialist that has plans to put the wrongs of the capitalist system to right and create a world socialist republic based upon a universal love of Bio-Diesel and altruistic food sharing.

Back in the real world we are faced with a reality that if we move towards a bio-diesel future the costs of food will go up and these costs will fall disproportionately upon the poor. The knowledgeable among us will not have missed the irony of Ethiopia exporting food during the famines of the 1980's.

But it's not just about the poor ... plantation farming and alien crops has wide ranging impact upon wildlife as wilderness is reduced and monocultures limit species diversity ... and of course increased demands upon water further impacts upon its free availability to wildlife.

I'm also pretty sure that some people will have also figured out that world meat consumption is rising and that requires even more land and water, not just for the livestock but to also produce the food they're fed.

I'm guessing that you don't mind if the poor don't eat meat because they wont be able to afford it, nor will you care if they can't afford the locally grown crops destined for export to be used as bio-fuel. They can always eat carrot tops eh!

While hydroponics solves some problems you haven't really thought about the energy costs and you also completely failed when considering the nitrogen fertiliser required for hydroponic production ... the manufacture of nitrogen fertiliser is of course energy intensive and an inefficient use of a limited fossil fuel, oil!

What about the extra energy required for the running of the hydroponics lights, pumps ... will they be powered from bio-diesel generators?

You also haven't taken into account the rising number of cars in the world and the potential numbers once India, China and Africa get into swing.

0
1
Silver badge
Happy

Re: AC Re: utter bollocks

".....my tried and tested system, which is to downvote any of Matt's posts without even reading it....." LOL, always warming to know I'm hitting the right buttons with The Faithful. Frankly, I have long thought it waaaaaay beyond the capabilities of many of the sheeple that bleat here to actually read and comprehend posts.

0
0
Silver badge
Angel

Re: Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price

"..... you didn't notice the price hike in veg oil a few years back....." Cough*catering packs*cough. 100 litres at a time. Much, much less than a pound a litre.

0
0
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: AC Chet Mannly utter bollocks

".....you do realise that fish food is generally just ground up fish....." You obviously know as little about fish as you do everything else. Whilst the common types such as salmon are predatory, many others are herbivorous such as the Grass Carp grown for food in China. In the US the Grass Carp is even used for controlling the levels of river weeds.

"....about the same time I see cold fusion working." You never know, maybe they'll do something on Cartoon Network for you.

0
0
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: Re: AC AC utter bollocks

So your contention is that we should just give up on developing any alternatives, crawl into a hole and sharpen sticks? Yeah, you do that, you won't be missed.

0
0
Flame

Re: utter bollocks

Corn is poor in oil production there are better oil producing plants which produce an order of magnitude more oil for the same land use and algae in ponds is two (nearly 3) orders of magnitude more although does require infrastructure and lots of water.

Flame icon .. cause you want to burn the stuff

1
0
Bronze badge
Facepalm

Re: utter bollocks

Uhh! You forgot to mention that the by-product of ethanal is corn meal, which alone with about four other good by products is sold to the public. Corn meal was a good feed stock last I checked.

1
0
Bronze badge
Go

Re: Linking basic staples like corn to the oil price

Totaly agree Tom 13. I remember when the whole corn ethanol craze started, Allen Greenspan was scratching his head wondering why they didn't go with switch grass and methanol instead. The problems with fuel cell technology has been largely solved with methanol and the new reforming processes that attend with it. So it looks like he was rather prophetic - however, I suspect the whole corn thing was actually secretly promoted by the oil industry because they new it was doomed to fail. Corn ethanol producers are failing in droves in my area, so don't be surprised if the problem fixes itself soon.

Switch grass can be grown on barely arable land and ditches, and eve the state could make money to offset the load on taxpayers by harvesting the stuff from the roadsides and selling it to methanol producers. This is what is closer to sustainable in carbon neutral technology.

1
0
Boffin

Title Fail

It's not "Electric Cars" that are failing in Oz and the USA, it is the champion of one particular EV technology. Battery replacement only works if you can get all EV manufacturers to agree to use the same battery pack (or one of a very limited selection). Of course manufacturers being what they are did not want to work together on their car designs so Better Place basically ended up with just Renault - and only one of their four electric models. It also turns out that the Renault Fluence ZE is not that good by EV standards.

What the Better Place model also required was for battery-change stations to be not too expensive when compared to rapid charging stations. This all falls apart when you find that a DC rapid charging station can be bought for as little as $13000 but a battery change-station can set you back tens of millions. This then got even worse when the EV manufacturer that made Better Place's Fluence ZE, switched to AC rapid charging for its new Zoe model - meaning that rapid chargers could easily cost less than $1500 each.

5
2

Re: Title Fail

"It's not "Electric Cars" that are failing in Oz and the USA, it is the champion of one particular EV technology."

*sigh* why is the champion leaving? Because electric cars are a total flop in the US and Oz (sorry its post fail, not title fail)

Its pretty obvious why - the US and Australia are characterised by l-o-n-g driving distances. My Grandparents used to live 350km away - that would be 2-3 overnight charges depending on the car/driving style (or 2-3 swaps if they did put infrastructure all the way out to small population centres which would be phenomenally expensive) to get there vs 1/2 tank of petrol.

So electric travel time is 3-4 days vs less than 4 hours no stops needed for petrol/diesel...

Maybe in Europe where the population is far more densely packed the electric car *might* make sense, but not in places like the US and Aus.

10
4

Re: Title Fail

"a DC rapid charging station can be bought for as little as $13000"

...which will significantly reduce the working life of your $7000-$10,000 battery, making each rapid charge significantly more expensive than you imply here.

4
1

Re: Title Fail

"...which will significantly reduce the working life of your $7000-$10,000 battery, making each rapid charge significantly more expensive than you imply here."

Not according to the manufacturers of these cars, or those who drive them daily and use such chargers regularly. Also, battery packs currently cost about $5000-$6000 and manufacturers are generally giving them a 5-year performance warranty so any problems between now and 2018 are covered.

1
2

Re: Title Fail

I know people that frequently travel those sorts of distances in electric cars in a single day. Not just in "high-range" EVs like the Tesla Model S, but mainly using a Nissan Leaf.

1
2

Re: Title Fail

"Not according to the manufacturers of these cars, or those who drive them daily and use such chargers regularly. Also, battery packs currently cost about $5000-$6000 and manufacturers are generally giving them a 5-year performance warranty"

1 - Nissan (the manufacturer of the leaf) say that rapid charging reduces the working life of the battery

2 - the cost depends on the battery pack obviously, the only car I had complete data for is the leaf. Current estimates are U$7,000-10,000 to replace the battery and dispose of the old one (batteries like that contain lots of toxic chemicals, so there is a disposal cost involved here, not just the battery pack)

3 - rapid charging reduces the life of the battery to around 5 years, hence the warranty. Without rapid charging batteries are expected to last for 10 years (I'm guessing mileage on that will vary with driving style/average temparature/electricity supply quality etc).

All power to you if you are happy to replace batteries more often, but reduced working life is a legitimate cost associated with rapid charging, and not an insignificant one.

4
0

Re: Title Fail

"I know people that frequently travel those sorts of distances in electric cars in a single day...mainly using a Nissan Leaf"

Nissan claims 100 miles (160km) per charge, not 220 so they are either magical or you are making stuff up :-)

Also that was calculated at 38mph in ideal conditions with a professional driver, not highway speeds and real world conditions which will likely drain the battery faster.

Even taking Nissan's figures as absolute gospel (in the way that we never do with regular manufacturers fuel economy claims) - that's still 2 charges.

For 90% of driving (commuting, shopping) the range of electric cars isn't a problem, but like most Australians I need a car that does long trips too, and that's where the electric car currently falls down.

5
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Title Fail

My Volt works just fine but swapping batteries is stupid.

Electric cars work fine. stupid idea is just stupid.

Title Fail Stands..

1
2
doi
WTF?

Re: Title Fail

350km is easily doable without recharging in my new Tesla Model S, soon to be delivered. (Which is cheaper than a comparable BMW here in Norway.)

With other EVs such as Mitsubishi i-Miev or Nissan Leaf you need to recharge on route. Using Chademo fast chargers your battery is recharged to 80-90% in approx 20 minutes, about the same time you use to eat, drink and go to the toilet. No need for overnight charging.

How often do most people drive more than 100km in one go anyways? 99% of people drive far less than that per day, and could easily drive an EV instead of a fossil car. If you need to drive twice as much as that, just charge your EV both at home and at work, no big deal. (If you need to drive even more than that daily, I pity you.) Nissan even offers free rental car for the few days every year you need to drive longer distances.

Tesla are to install their superchargers here in Europe also, where Tesla owners can recharge for those long distance trips. For free.

2
3
Silver badge

Re: How often do most people drive more than 100km in one go anyways?

At least 24 times a year for me. But even if it were only twice, my primary car would need to be able to deal with it.

0
0
Silver badge

Yes, most of my driving is well inside the range

But a significant part of my annual mileage isn't.

So, I'd have to either buy and maintain two cars - one EV for commute, one diesel* for longer range - or hire a diesel* car every time I need the longer range.

At the moment, the EV simply costs far too much and depreciates too fast for either of those to be economically viable.

- I'm also very lucky in that I do have somewhere to charge an EV, most city dwellers don't so couldn't even consider it.

So my question is - where is the car that is both these things?

Plug-in EV for my daily commute, diesel genny for my occasional long journey?

How ****ing hard can it be if even Top Gear can cobble that together?

* For low-carbon long-range, diesel is the only choice.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

EVs are so impractical

It's no wonder that EV sales have tanked. All three supporters of EVs...now have one. Since these vehicles are so impractical for 99.9999 % of motorists, why would anyone be surprised to see all of the EV suppliers dying a painful death or dumping their losing products and moving to clean Diesels?

2
5

Re: EVs are so impractical

Three supporters? Tesla are currently selling 400 Model S electric cars per week, despite them being as expensive as a BMW 5 or 7 series. The only reason they aren't selling more is that they can't currently make them any faster.

Why don't you see if you can get an extended test drive of an EV (Nissan do 24-hour test drives of the Leaf) and see how impractical it ends up being.

0
0

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.

Forums