It may even result in some direction..
Say what you want, Mr Dell is no dummy. I wonder how he is going to fare with Ballmer.
The PC business could experience not one but two seismic events on Monday. First, the world’s third biggest PC maker is expected to announce a $20bn leveraged buyout, taking it off the stock market and putting it back into private hands. Twenty-five years after Dell floated, the PC maker’s management would no longer be …
Say what you want, Mr Dell is no dummy. I wonder how he is going to fare with Ballmer.
Michael Dell will beat him down like the monkey boy Ballmer is.
I'm guessing it'll take one board meeting before MS change board representatives.
embrace extend extinguish
get a grip its how its gonna go so windows 9 can be a totaly held held os and the migration of americans to retards is complete
Where was/is this stock headed?
Wouldn't it be significantly cheaper to buy Dell in a couple of months time ? Seems like the stock price would be destined to collapse together with the dwindling PC sales...
>migration of americans to retards is complete
You mean like when computers went GUI?
"so windows 9 can be a totaly held held os"
Every version of Widows could be totally hand held. This has been the traditional way to move the box from store shelf to checkout lane when you purchase it..
........at least implicitly underlined? MS will have a 10% stake - that gives them a say but not any form of unilateral power over Dell. The other investors are highly unlikely to roll over just because Demon* Lord Ballmer tells them to.
*Yes, I am satirising the attitude of some round here.
Satirise all you want, but someone who has a 10% stake in a very fat pie will occasionally put in a personal appearance, and they may only have 10% of "Dell", but they have 100% of the software Dell needs to flog hardware to sheep which offers IMHO quite some additional leverage.
I may do Ballmer an injustice here, but from what I have heard so far he's not terrible good at the whole cooperation/collaboration thing, so board meetings could get, umm, "lively"..
Of course. I entirely agree with you. My only point was an attempt to pre-empt the howls of "Dell's been borged" etc. I was simply pointing out that although Redmond will of course have a say "at the table" both because of their stake and because they are the provider of the main os that Dell use, that there are limits on how far they can throw their weight around. In this "transfer of ownership" there are several powerful players involved, some of whom may not be exactly willing to swallow Redmond's agenda in any automatic sense. I was simply hoping to contribute to a slightly more grown-up debate than that we very often get here the moment that the "Great Satan" is mentioned.
I wonder if this will make it easier to get Linux on Dell equipment. If Microsoft buys a piece of Dell they'll have to tread very carefully with efforts to suppress Linux on PCs being shipped from manufactures, especially a manufacture that they are part owner of. Remeber this isn't the samething as Apple owning to whole chain.
Here's hoping for reverse-borgification... Mr. Dell would make a pretty good successor to Ballmer as head of MS... the sooner the better.
I do worry that Dell will be hurt by closer Microsoft ties... there are very few companies who have come out well from any kind of partnership with MS. Rather like King Henry VIII's wives there are advantages and disadvantages to such domestic arrangements.
You don't know Microsoft, do you ? Dropping Linux is highest on the list of conditions imposed. Dell will obey because even I would do it for few billions of dollars. It's not Microsoft who will do it, Dell will suddenly discover that nobody wants Linux.
...suddenly no one wants Linux.
And over at HP they will be rubbing their hands with glee as Dell says to all their Server customers that run Linux, go take a running jump.
Redhat, Suse, VMware, Citrix, appasure and all the other middlewear stuff comes to mind.
Never mind the SAN/Networking stuff
How much income do Dell make on desktops compared to server, storage and services revenue?
I'd wager a lot...
But the Great Satan that is Microsloth wants all PCs to run Windoze on them.
(I know I left out quite a bunch of euphemisms...)
But I do get the sense of yet another MS sock puppet being prepared.
I get the feeling that the Microsoft investment will be the undoing of Dell. Microsoft's software decisions of later have been stupid. They are desperately trying to copy others while at the same time ignoring what made them successful. Examples: Google -> Live search/Bing; iPad -> Windows 8. You do not ignore what your customers are saying and expect to be successful: Dell lost the #1 PC crown to HP because Dell refused to sell AMD chips back when AMD really was better. If Dell is forced to listen to Microsoft who is not listening to their customers, then Dell may be in big big trouble. I foresee trouble up ahead for Dell.
It could actually be an interesting exercise to follow the track of all the companies MS has invested in or bought up and see what happened. Didn't Nokia stock brick quicker than a Samsung laptop with Linux when they signed a deal with Microsoft?
There are others who died after MS got their grubby hands on them:
- Palm: tanked after switching PalmOS to WinMo.
- Sendo: oooh the humanity!
Add HTC and LG who signed deals with Microsoft. How well do they fare on the mobile market now ?
If modernity is characterized by a loss of the sense of the real, this fact is connected to what has happened to money in the twentieth century. Everything threatens to become unreal once money ceases to be real. I said that a strong sense of counterfeit reality prevails in "Disorder and Early Sorrow." That fact is ultimately to be traced to the biggest counterfeiter of them all - the government and its printing presses. Hyperinflation occurs when a government starts printing all the money it wants, that is to say, when the government becomes a counterfeiter. Inflation is that moment when as a result of government action the distinction between real money and fake money begins to dissolve. That is why inflation has such a corrosive effect on society. Money is one of the primary measures of value in any society, perhaps the primary one, the principal repository of value. As such, money is a central source of stability, continuity, and coherence in any community. Hence to tamper with the basic money supply is to tamper with a community's sense of value. By making money worthless, inflation threatens to undermine and dissolve all sense of value in a society. ...
Those who know how to exploit an inflationary situation can gain as much as others lose. As a result, inflation creates a topsy-turvy world. The fact that people are losing and making fortunes overnight is responsible for all the social confusions in "Disorder and Early Sorrow," such a s Cornelius's inability to tell his son from his servant. In a world in which all distinct categories begin to dissolve, a pervasive sense of relativism develops. Cornelius's convictions begin to weaken and he feels unable to take a stand against the opinions of the younger generation. In a frightening anticipation of today's tyranny of political correctness, the history professor retreats into a n academic skepticism when faced with the fanaticism of youth, trying to make his lack of conviction masquerade as a form of broadmindedness ...
Must be too long since I read my economics textbooks or these sentences are incorrect:
"Microsoft, along with VC Silver Lake Partners, is reported to have lined up $15bn from UK and US banks to finance a deal, making them minority investors in a private Dell. Reports value an estimated $3bn Microsoft contribution as a 10 per cent stake."
- MS+Silver Lake together have gotten $15bn from banks to invest in Dell
- MS invests $3bn
=> Silver Lake then invests $15bn-$3bn=$12bn?
Or are the banks not loaning money to MS and/or Silver Lake but investing directly in Dell?
MS 3B is 10% so total 15B gives MS + Silver Lake 50%, or 49% if it is a minority stake. Presumably Michael Dell + associates get the other 51.
MS and Silver Lake can get $ from wherever: internal resources, investment partners, banks etc. as long as they plonk down 15B to help to buy out existing shareholders nobody really cares how they finance the deal.
What's wrong with that?
MS wants to make sure Dell is pushing windows (and it's tools) in the server market rather than Llinux and I'm sure Dell will get preferential discounts from MS to achieve this. The business market is where MS makes it's real cash.
This strategy may well piss off other channel partners though and could cause problems for MS long term, happy hand grenade juggling MS.
One could make the same case about googarolla.
I concur. There are a lot of server farms with a lot of servers in the world. A lot of those servers are already running on Linux, with both local and geographical redundancy for critical functions, which Linux does (or at least can be made to do) well. If Microsoft are worried, it's because they probably should be.
Apple are competitors at the OS level.
This would turn one of their biggest customers into a finger of MS.
There other big customers will notice if MS is anything less than perfectly even handed in their dealings with "New Dell"
But history demonstrates that MS deals a little more "fairly" with its own than with others.
This might create the impetous in other manufactures to put a good Linux distro, like Mint, on their hardware, with proper drivers. This may turnout to be the best thing that's happened for Linux in years.
Problem is they can't. Years of servitude for Microsoft made them incapable to do that so they will go down burning in flames one after another.
So MS is going to just throw more money at the problem. Seems it would be cheaper to just fix the GUI so they get rid of that Unity desktop joke so business and your average PC user would actually want Windows 8.
Get your heads out of your a$$e$ and go talk to real people that make less than $500 a week and find out what is really going on since tossing $15 billion at a problem for the wrong solution is foolish. The reason you have this problem is you're only listening to people that can buy what ever they want without even thinking about it so they don't care about price and if they do make a mistake of buying Windows 8 they can just buy another computer with 7 but most of us have to save up just for Windows and I'm not spending good money on a touch screen OS for a new PC.
I wouldn't want to go to the wedding, let alone drop in on the honeymoon.
Would you say that Microsoft is going to Dell in a handbasket?
IMO the biggest mistake which Microsoft is making is to deprecate older software bundles, even if they're still being maintained. Now, this isn't something new; people have been saying this for over the years now. When Vista came out people wanted to buy into XP until that ran out; Windows 7 had a somewhat different approach but you also see this happening on other platforms.
Visual Studio 2012 for example. Now, so far it pretty much works for me (evaluating the Professional version) but only after I made some serious changes to the layout. I've seen (in forums) plenty of people who would be very happy if they could still buy VS2010 somewhere.
I think that's the kind of strategy Microsoft should be considering here. Don't call it "giving in", nah, they should think of this as a soft of exit strategy. If sales of Server 2012 aren't going as well as planned, maybe you can fill in the gaps by selling Server 2010 as well. If Windows 8 doesn't sell; keep Windows 7 around as well.
Something tells me that if you sell Server 2010 with a little discount (because its no longer maintained, only supported) you're likely to attract new customers. Don't underestimate the amount of people who buy this stuff second hand due to price concerns and lack of availability.
Bad software and dire build quality together at last.
MS has a long history of back-handed and "under the table deals" with OEMs.
But... Now they're buying a seat at the table at Dell, a minor seat at that. If they try to exert influence like they've done in the past, the first answer from Dell might (should) be, "Put it before the board at the next meeting."
By buying the minor share, MS might just find it's switched from major background influence, like at Nokia, to "kid at the table".
(I can really see MS ditching its share of Dell within 2-5 years from now, when it finds out it can't get its way.)
There are lots of benefits of going private for Dell while they try to reinvent themselves. Michael Dell might even enjoy going to work again.
However, there are a couple of issues they'll have to overcome:
1. Servers. Linux is to servers as Windows is to the desktop. Dell can't change that all by themselves, even with Microsoft in their corner. Do we think that Microsoft hasn't already tried to use huge incentives to get the server vendors onto Windows? I assume that Dell will continue to focus on Linux in the server space, but I'm sure there will be tension.
2. Android. This one is tougher. The Android-based mobility market is a big chunk of the overall mobility segment, and I don't think Dell can continue to not participate. Not just for the revenue, but for the ecosystem opportunities. I don't imagine Microsoft would agree with me on this point.
I can't speak about your #2 but for argument #1, you're missing one point here. Servers are overwhelmingly purchased without OS, as opposed to PCs. Buyers already have licensing agreements with MS so server vendors can't force them to buy another copy. In fact, most of the time server vendors do not know what OS will be installed. Microsoft could have convinced them to drop support for Linux but this would have made hardware makers unhappy and with the fierce competition among OEMs, there was nothing MS could do, again because servers are being purchased naked.
...perhaps Apple will swoop in at the last minute and buy Dell with some of the loose change they have down the back of the sofa.
Hell, I'd do it just to see monkey boy's reaction.
I must guiltily admit it would seriously make my day just to imagine the resulting furniture bill..
sorry a tablet os and this makes WHOM happy oh you MEAN ONE PC maker
in fact it ought to scare them as ms screws up and takes out one more supply inthe chain for its own sake.
SORRY this is so funny
It certainly won't inspire confidence in any potential buyer with at least two communicating neurons.
you can fanny around with home user channel all you want, but please stay the Fuck away from my poweredge.
Many experts in the field of analysis for technology companies controlling their hardware and software stack, like Apple or Oracle (for their server line), caution that independant OEM companies like Lenovo and HP will "probably" be at a distinct disadvantage in dealing with a Dell focuses Microsoft, and therfore move more quickly to a more secue position of flexibility by supporting Google ChromeOS and possibly Ubuntu Linux on desktops, smartphones and servers as a hedge.
Good luck to all of Microsoft's OEM hardware partners looking to Redmond to be ethical, fair and honest in their arrangements and dealings with the behemoth, since trustworthiness and integrity has never been a hallmark of Mictosoft's practices for far too long, according to seasoned and wise technology observers
Beware the old and true saying: "Those who lie down with snakes are almost guaranteed to be poisoned"
I can't see that this is a good idea for either Dell or MS. MS will get a seat on the board, which is enough to have real influence. History has shown that companies where MS gets serious influence make bad decisions on the promise, and get shafted in the future when the decisions turn out badly. MS have a very bad reputation for keeping faith.
MS can't offer anything to Dell that makes this attractive. Early access to technology for MS isn't exactly going to be of earth shattering importance, MS have done very little new or innovative for a very long time. But such access has the threat of stifling innovation and business agility at Dell. The downside for MS is that they are again getting into the position of starting to compete with their customers. A cosy relationship with Dell will almost certainly add to the perception of all the other PC manufactures that, whilst they can't do much about the need to purchase Windows for PCs, they probably want to actively consider every possible option for any other product they make. And right now that means Android. Maybe MS thinks that they simply can't fight Android in the mass market and will be content with a only couple of big manufacturers (Dell and Nokia). This puts MS on a trajectory to buy these two and to compete with Apple head to head in this space. This could end as badly as iPod versus Zune, and if I were a betting man, that is where I would put my money.
Well, at least it won't result in any Dell Chromebooks...
Dell servers running Windows whatever server hosting "Dynamics" or whatever their
clusterf**kapplication will be called.
Kind of like an IBM iSeries or what was an HP 3000 series.
But from Microsoft.
I can barely control my excitement.
Customers will be beating down the doors to get their hands on this bundle.
4 years ago, after a decade of building, upgrading and over clocking my own machines, I decided to buy a PC that 'just worked' and one that I couldn't XXXX up by messing with the BIOS etc. The XPS 420 I bought fit the bill perfectly but was improved with the upgrade from Vista to W7. Dell and Microsoft, a great combination.
Now, the old Dell is getting long in throwaway tooth and I needed a replacement. After trying W8 I decided I would rather use a flame thrower to clean my teeth. I could have bought another Dell ss I've been really happy with the old one but buying one would have meant either getting W8 preinetsalled or downgrading (at extra cost) to W7.
In the end I decided I wanted something again that 'just worked' so sitting on my office desk is a new 27in iMac. It has cost me over £2k bit it more than just works, its a beautiful, fast and well made machine that is a pleasure to use.
So Dell and Microsoft have lost my custom this time around and to be honest, if I ever need a laptop then my experience of using the iMac and OS X would point me towards a Macbook or Air. I would think there are other PC users that feel the same way as buying the next version of Windows is not the same no brainer decision it used to be.