Feeds

back to article Tiny tech ZigBee harnesses puny power of the press

The ZigBee Alliance - which looks after the low-power radio comms standard - has now introduced wireless communications that are powered by the act of pressing a key. Green Power is an extension to the Zigbee protocol that allows switches and sensors to operate from tiny amounts of power - such as the power generated by the …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
WTF?

Am I missing something?

Adding a piezo-electric micro-generator to a light switch? Why not just divert a few micro Amps from the current being switched?

Is this just a really bad example?

0
4
Bronze badge

Re: Am I missing something?

My thoughts exactly. Isn't there plenty at that scale that leaks out anyway, just wire it up across earth and neutral shirley ?

0
3

Re: Am I missing something?

Yes.

The switch in question is not switching a load current, it is a wireless/remote switch. The mechanical action of the switch can be leveraged (no pun intended) to provide the energy to power up a transmitter which then reads and transmits the status of the switch to a controller which then switches the load current accordingly.

Took me a while to figure the gobbledegook out.

6
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Am I missing something?

Depends on the device. If it is an LED or Fluorescent bulb that you are switching then they tend to flicker. You can fit a bypass that lets some trickle past which helps.

0
0
Gold badge

Re: Am I missing something?

That makes far more sense. I have a load of radio operated switch plugs at home with lights stuck in 'em and the remote has a set of rubber buttons to press for on/off.

You should be able to get quite a bit of juice from having a piezoelectric wotsit behind each button without needing any more squeezing than it already does. Probably a zero-sum game for complexity too. As it is, the thing has a PCB with seperate contact patches for each switch so the thing "knows" which switch has been pressed and can issue the right command. Having the thing issue the appropriate command depending on which pin got powered is probably as simple.

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Am I missing something?

The idea of self-powered wireless switches means less mains wiring needed, and you can place the switch wherever you want in the room without having to wire it up to anything.

This is especially helpful for listed buildings where you often need planning permission for alterations.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Am I missing something?

Its not a great example... imagine a light switch as a signalling device that doesn't need a connection to the mains at all.

The switch simply sits in the wall with a Zigbee radio/piezo power source. You can move the switch freely without rewiring the house. Or add extra swtiches without wiring. Or monitor the light status remotely from a PC. Or link the lights with others and switch them all on at once.

All without signalling wires.

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Am I missing something?

What you're missing is that with zigbee (or other wireless protocols) there's no need to run wires to the "switch" in the first place - which makes repositioning or multiples a trivial undertaking.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Am I missing something?

During recent ' Smart watch' threads I was musing on how much energy would be required to transmit a simple control to from a wristwatch to a nearby phone, and whether this energy could be harvested from the button-press.

How small can you go? The only thing I have first hand experience of is the piezo component in 'electronic' cigarette lighters.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Am I missing something?

It might just be the illustration (in the same way that speed camera signs show a antique bellows camera), but their diagram shows a lever switch- which has a longer throw than many light switches. Since energy is work times distance, is such a big switch required? I guess what I'm asking is "How small a switch is required to transmit these 21 bits 2 metres?"

0
0
Stop

Que?

"Green Power is an extension to the Zigbee protocol that allows switches and sensors to operate from tiny amounts of power - such as the power generated by the physical act of flicking the switch, or from tiny solar cells out of direct sunshine. It offers the promise of a wireless future which doesn't shudder to a halt when the battery runs out."

= "Green power allows switches to operate from the power generated by the physical act of flicking the switch".

Gobbledygook.

This should probably read "Green power allows the status of a switch to be transmitted wirelessly using power generated by the physical act of actuating the (physical, mechanical) switch".

HTH

5
0
Silver badge

Re: Pot, kettle, etc...

You accuse the press release of Gobbledygook but use the word "leverage" instead of "use"?

3
1
Go

Re: Pot, kettle, etc...

Yes, but if I had used the word use I wouldn't have been able to make the no-pun intended pun.

HTH

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Pot, kettle, etc...

Sounds like a win-win to me....

0
0
Gold badge
Thumb Up

*Astonishing*

I mean 1 keypress -> 168 bits of data NO local battery (if the device is not a receiver, which if its just for data input it does not need to be).

The "impossible" keyboard.

Completely transparent.

No PCB

No aerial

Is that not mildly impressive?

Obviously self powered sensors for industrial control and alarm systems would be early candidates for this if its secure enough and cannot be spoofed.

1
0
Vic
Silver badge

Re: *Astonishing*

> The "impossible" keyboard.

Certainly is...

> Completely transparent.

It's not transparent. There is circuitry involved...

> No PCB

You need a PCB.

> No aerial

You need an aerial.

> if its secure enough and cannot be spoofed

ZigBee has encryption built into the standard (AES-256, from memory, but it's been a few years since I've done any). You don't have to turn it on if you don't want to.

Vic.

0
0

Wireless switches sound a great idea - would reduce the cost of wiring a building by a fair amount.

I've got the Phillips Hue system at home which uses Zigbee to communicate with each bulb (you can control each individual bulb locally or remotely via phone, computer, etc). One thing I find annoying is that the hub can't always contact the the furtherest away bulbs (about 10 metres but around corner with thick brick walls). This is probably specific to the Hue system, but I wonder how far the radio signal from these switches will be able to travel and how it'll cope with obstacles.

0
0
Silver badge

It sounds like you could do with a repeater in the 'elbow' of your L-shaped room... presumably the bulbs themselves do this?

***

The signal from the proposed unpowered switches only has to get as far as the next powered node in the mesh network. Since most rooms in your house have a wall socket or a light socket, that should suffice- though yeah, older houses with thick walls and unusual shapes will cause issues. That the switch doesn't require power just means your can place it wherever is most convenient to you, without re-plastering your wall, dangling cables or having to replace batteries.

1
0
Happy

Emergency buttons

Will work just as you expect, in that the chances of the signal getting through is improved by pounding the button harder!

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Emergency buttons

I'm thinking more of one of the fire bells that require you to turn a handle.. you give out an audible and a radio alert!

1
0
Holmes

Mesh infrastructure

If we make the reasonable assumption that the target device is going to be, relatively, power hungry there is still going to be need to have electrical outlets. Imagine building the proxy part of the mesh into the fascia of said outlets which could then retransmit to the next proxy either wireless in the same manner (the payload hopping along each enabled fascia) or over the mains wiring (like those Ethernet over mains adapters) to the target.

Replace your outlet fascias and have instant building-wide mesh.

1
0
Bronze badge

Car keys?

Any possibility of car manufacturers using this. So you never have to replace a battery in your key again?

Or is the expected distance too much?

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Car keys?

21 bits won't other the security you would want from your car keys fob. The battery in your car key fob lasts a few years, and when it runs out you can fall back on using your real key until you get a new battery.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Car keys?

I'd have though that the 'expected distance' for car keys would be very small, e.g a few feet. Just squeeze the 'handle' of your car key and it generates enough power to send its ID to the car.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Car keys?

But those IDs change, so that thieves don't intercept and then clone them (in theory!).

Car key fobs transmit a 40 bit code, and also have memory to store the rolling code. The car will accept any of the next 256 of the rolling codes, should you press the fob when you are out of range of your car.

0
0

@Dave 126 Re: Car keys?

"21 bits won't other the security you would want from your car keys fob"

It's 21 bytes Dave (but agree with the rest of what you said).

1
0
Bronze badge
Trollface

Re: Car keys?

Odd, I've been unlocking car doors (well, all sorts of doors really) without batteries for quite some time now.

Insert key into slot; rotate key in the proper direction; open door.

1
0
Gold badge
Boffin

Re: Car keys?

That's 21 bytes

0
0
Bronze badge

Re: Car keys?

...when it runs out you can fall back on using your real key...

Not with my car. I can unlock with the real key, but the alarm goes off unless I disarm it by pressing the unlock button on a key.

0
0

Re: the 'expected distance' for car keys would be very small

Not entirely, because one of the functions of a remote keylock is to help locate your car in a big car park or long street.

Thought having said that, you would only need that capability when the car park has a substantial number of other cars in it, which implies that there is probably another car near you which could mesh with the others and pass the signal to your own car even when you're too far away from it.

1
0
Happy

And the fun bit

The marketing premise of these energy-havesting light switches is that because they need no batteries or wiring, you can just stick them where you want with velcro. Which means that you can have lots of fun by moving them all around someone's house, so that they appear to randomly turn on lights in other rooms.

Excellent for drunken parties. We need more standards like that.

3
0
Silver badge
Thumb Down

Re: And the fun bit

I and many people I know spend a large part of our lives searching under cushions for TV remote controls and wandering around the house looking for cordless phones. Fumbling around in the pitch dark looking for the light switch will add to this fun.

0
0

Another big advantage ...

would be that buttons with the piezo electric backing would probably have a much more positive feel than those nasty, spongy buttons that infest far too many modern devices and you can never tell for certain exactly when they have been pressed.

1
0

other uses

Can they make a wireless, batteryless keyboard with this?

0
0
Silver badge

Re: other uses

would bit rate be a problem? Think 40 wpm plus repeat keys like ctrl, alt.

0
0

Re: the 'expected distance' for car keys would be very small

You need to be far enough to sustain minimal damage when the pipe-bomb wired to the starter goes off.

Or at least that's the use-case I would expect for at least some buyers of keyless starters, in some lines of business.

0
0

Seems a little pointless

A typical toggle switch has an activation force of around 1N and a travel (with the old fashioned type) of maybe 10mm, so if we're 100% efficient we'd only get 10mJ of energy. If we assume that piezo mechanism recovers half the energy we get a useable 5 mJ per switching action.

On the other hand

A 3000mAh lithium AA cell has a 15 yr shelf life and provides enough power as 1.6 million activations of that toggle switch. OK they're £2 a go but I can't help thinking that this is solving a non-problem?

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.