don't be the repetative boredom-fest tghat FC2 was!!!!
In a few simple beats Far Cry 3's accidental hero, Jason Brody, goes from being nervy, spoilt rich kid to John Rambo, as his extreme sports holiday takes a turn for the worse. It’s a forgivably quick process for plot development purposes, if an abrupt one, but made palatable by the use of subtle tricks skilfully employed to pull …
don't be the repetative boredom-fest tghat FC2 was!!!!
So, to be clear, Far Cry 2 was a far cry from Far Cry 1 and Far Cry 3 is a far cry from Far Cry 2 and a far cry from Far Cry 1?
do i need to have played FC1 & 2 to understand this or is it a bit more standalone?
FC1 was a massively superior game....
FC2 was a simple FPS with a plot as thin as a filleted anchovy....
but do i need to play 1&2 to understand 3?
No, they're all completely standalone and have their own unrelated storylines.
farcry3 does look good.
And in FC2 you chose your character, I chose the oldest one.
FC2 was repetative but engrossing
Since Eurogamer. Got to play the demo there and I just wasn't impressed. The controls weren't mapped correctly (got stuck trying to open a door because it kept telling me to press the wrong buttons) which is forgivable for a demo.
What wasn't though was the texture quality. From far away things looked amazing, up close? Not so much, some of the ladders reminded meof playing HL2 the textures were such low quality, it was just awful. Really put me off the game.
This is the reason I do not play betas any more. In the end I found most of them spoil the actual finished game.
Though to be honest the textures should have been sorted by beta. Maybe it was an alpha?
Yikes, must finish reading before posting. You said it was a demo not a beta. So I would have thought in Sept they had the textures sorted.
"This is the reason I do not play betas any more. In the end I found most of them spoil the actual finished game."
I have never played a beta for pretty much the same reason. Playing a half-finished game might appeal to some people, but why it should, is something that escapes me entirely. Possibly some people feel that there is some degree of prestige attached to it.
Will there be signs everywhere showing me where mike bar is located?
A lot of the screenshots are identical to those on Pocket Lint. Looks like the software co just send out some pictures for journalists to write about.
There will likely be strict caveats on the press against publishing their own screenshots. It's probable a PR dept somewhere sends out a number of 'approved' screenshots for reviewers.
Anyone know if Ubisoft are still doing that atrocious 'constant net connection required to play' mince? I fancy getting this for PC, but I'll probably abort to PS3 if they're going to shut me down if my internet breaks.
I was just thinking the same thing, it's three pages that tell you -about- the game, but not what it's like to actually play it...
Most of Ubisoft's recent games (and older ones that have been patched) just require a net connection to activate it and then you can make it available for off-line use. It's more like Steam now.
Mind you, I bought From Dust in a Steam sale and wasn't actually able to activate it, since their bloody servers went down that weekend. I guess they must have been surprised that more than two people wanted to login on the same Saturday.
To be fair when reviewed on console, it's difficult to get your own decent screenshots. Most official websites have an images section and that's often where shots are sourced, hence their duplication on other sites. If images are sent by PRs, they tend to be the same as those anyway.
We usually take our own screenshots for PC games, though.
Come on. It's an FPS - do you really need to know what that's like to play? Run around, shoot stuff, ride on vehicles. Par for the course. I know that - what I want to know is whether the environment all this happens in and the storyline behind it are things I'll enjoy FPS-ing in.
By the sounds of it, no this is not one for me. I'll stick to sci-fi shooters, thanks.
"do you really need to know what that's like to play?"
Yes, it might be crap.
agree about review being weirdly 'advertorial'.
No mention really of the hunting animals for bags, etc, etc which would surely get a mention for pure weirdness if no other reason if the game had actually been played for any length of time...
Want a proper review? Try RPS: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/11/21/wot-i-think-far-cry-3-single-player/
From the bottom of P2 of the review:
"Hunting game animals also leads to further expansion of Jason’s armoury as their hide is harvested to fashion larger wallets, backpacks and arrow quivers, like some cut-down version of Monster Hunter. Plants can be similarly harvested for healing and empowering drugs, while the game also sports some of the coolest drug trip sequences as Dr. Earnhardt helps you expand your horizons."
Considering they actually mention the hunting thing that you claim they don't talk about, perhaps we should ask if you read the articles on the register before 'reviewing' them in the comments.
Since when video games are technology stuff? As soon as I could drive, I traded my snes for girls and real life.
A real life that includes posting on a review of a video game to say simply that you don't play video games any more?
There's nothing wrong with being a gamer. It's the biggest entertainment industry in the world as it stands. Games are played by more people and paid for by more people than any film, CD, whatever. You've missed on on a lot of fun sir.
I traded my snes for a couple of PS2 games, i think i got done.
quote: "As soon as I could drive, I traded my snes for girls and real life."
I think you got done. Most of my game playing friends are married, with multiple kids, and hold down high-paying jobs. Overall they are very satisfied with their quality of life.
Methinks you should've kept gaming :)
I smell bovine excrement.
Obviously that worked out well for you, hence your post here bitching off video games. It might surprise you but its pretty normal for girls under 40 to have bought a console and they even play games these days, once they've finished the ironing.
I kept my PS3 and what do you know? At times it even manages to keep my gf entertained :-)
Don't worry, son. Once you actually grow up, you might just become your own person and meet a woman who you genuinely like and who likes the genuine you.
I did. I have a wonderful fiancee who gives me my gaming time, and we still enjoy dinner, dancing and each other's company....and despite what the cliches will tell you, you can be a gamer and still have a beautiful, intelligent and charming partner - mine is a qualified nurse, beautician and fitness instructor.
Sounds a bit over-qualified for gamer if you ask me :P
My wife: pulse present? Check.
FC1 was amazing, I still fire it up for a blast now and again...
When all the major reviewers on the internet are using the same pre-rendered screenshots it really does detract from the credibility of the review.
Sorry El Reg.
Why? Surely it's the conclusions drawn from playing the thing that matter, not how pretty (or not) the pictures look?
The OBVIOUS issue being that the screenshots are not from the reviewers experience of playing the game but while they are being used as such, they have been specifically chosen by the publisher. This instantly degrades the credibility of the review somewhat in my opinion.
Also, the fact that the reviewer seems to think this is ok degrades it further as it indicates they are more interested in doing what the publisher wants than offering an un-biased and honest opinion to the reader. Which is the whole point of a review.
If I wanted to read what Ubisoft wants me to think about the game I'd go to the Ubisoft website.
Sorry but it is what it is. The Register is increasingly not the place to come to for independent opinion. I fully understand that the business of The Register is advertising, but it comes to a time when you have to ask what's the point of reading their content?
How does it compare to say Uncharted 2 or 3?
I don't usually buy compromised multiplatform rubbish.
Q. Does the PC version require Ubi's legitimate customer punishment system?
A. The always on DRM is gone, but it does require uplay. So "sort of".
I don't play computer games any more. I'm quite happy to admit I get addicted to them too easy... and then life passes me by. So I just tend not to pick them up any more. Haven't really played anything for about 10 years now and I don't intend to start now - besides which I'm sure I'd be rubbish now.
That said I find it incredible sitting on the sidelines and watching the graphics improve and what people take for granted now. Promo shots or whatever this looks really awesome. You have to give it to the artists and everyone else involved in this industry for continually pushing the boundaries
Any idea how this works with 3d on a PC? I'm not much of a gamer, but I'm interested in a good first person shooter if it works nicely in 3d with my HMZ-T1 headset.... And head tracking! MW3 looks great on my headset but does not support head tracking, which totally breaks the VR experience.
Slightly off topic, but, I know that in Black Ops 2 they have managed to implement split-screen for 3d TVs without having to actually split the screen. I haven't got a 3D TV to test it though.
Stunning graphics but I shan't be touching it after the game-breaking bugs I encountered in Far Cry 2 made it impossible to complete. I spent an epic amount of time hitting 44% before it irrevocably broke, 20+ hours replaying and or trying to work around the bugs but was eventually defeated by that same bugged story quest. In some ways I was lucky as I heard many people encountered a game killing bug once they had fought their way to 88%.
Approximately 2 years ago the Far Cry 2 forum was little more than complaints about these bugs and the only official post I ever saw was "Good news, we are making Far Cry 3!!"
I completed it, twice, just to be sure it had the same ending. I never encountered a show-stopping bug. What problem did you have at 44% that stopped your progress?
I think I will wait until it is below the £15 price range. Not sure how it managed to score 90% with apparently such lame co-op and multiplayer modes.
Because lots of people like single player mode and don't use co-op or multiplayer? And as a single player game, it scores 90%
"Because lots of people like single player mode and don't use co-op or multiplayer?" -- I too like a good single player campaign, but, once completed on the most difficult setting, why would I continue to play the game? The uncharted series suffered because of this, as did Just Cause 2 (which has a community MP mod being currently developed). Frankly, I am totally bored of shooting at dumb AI controlled Bots and prefer going up against real players with cunning tactics, it improves my gameplay rather than forcing me to play the "take cover, pop up, shoot, take cover, pop up, shoot" method over and over again until the campaign is complete.
FPS games that offer diverse MP modes, tend to have more lasting appeal, even if they are just pumping out a rehash of last years game.
One of the most promising games that I have seen recently was Battlefield 3. The campaign was awful, with poor actors and a terrible plot, the interrogation scenario as a story telling device felt like a copy of Black Ops. On the upside, the Multiplayer mode was clearly the focus of DICEs resources. It pushed the boundaries in terms of map size and having all manner of user controlled vehicles, whilst still allowing regular combat on foot. BF3 was really let down (for me) by the crippling input lag :(
Most games have nobody left playing multiplayer by the time they reach £15.
"As engrossing, fulfilling and varied a sandbox..." It's NOT a sandbox, it's called an "open world" game. Why doesn't anyone in the IT industry, especially even game reviewers, understand this?
A sandbox mode, or a sandbox mod, or a sandbox game (like some Lego games) let you actually design the environment yourself just to fool around in. This is based on a metaphor of children playing at real life in a sandbox (sand pit).
An "open world" game, like Far Cry 3, is designed to place as few restrictions as possible on the options for gameplay and adventure.
And the definitive proof :) ....