Feeds

back to article Facebook tries to stop its staff using iPhones in 'dogfood' push

Facebook's campaign against the Apple iPhone has moved up a notch: staff are urged to grab an Android gadget and bug test the social network's mobile app as more punters plump for Google's operating system. Facebook employees are now told to eat their own "droidfood" - a reference to the software development approach of using …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

Anonymous Coward

iPhone?

Hello 00's, got some more of your lot trying to sneak into the teens with their outdated and antiquated tech.

4
17
Mushroom

All I know is...

The primary motivation I've always had for rooting every Android phone I've ever gotten was to get FACEBOOK & TWITTER off the thing ASAP. Getting the rest of the bloatware crap off is just a side benefit.

19
0
Silver badge
FAIL

As much as I dislike iPhones, the employees should have a choice in the phone they want. Unless Facebook is picking up the tab for the handset and mobile plan in its entirety, which is doubtful.

Forcing a choice will bite them in the butt.

8
1
Silver badge
WTF?

So er..you would ragequit your job if they wouldn't let you use the phone of your choice?

What is it with this incredible false sense of self-entitlement most folks seem to think they have nowadays?

5
26
Thumb Down

Who said anything about rage quitting? Also, what does a personal choice such as a mobile phone have to do with self-entitlement?

Would you like your employer to dictate what car you drive, or the brand of cereal to eat in the morning?

Just because you gave up on being individual, it doesn't mean that everyone else has to.

22
0

This post has been deleted by a moderator

Bronze badge

Re: Employees have a duty to be competent

At your own cost Eadon?

4
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Employees have a duty to be competent

You seriously think Facebook don't buy employees who test mobile solutions a mobile phone. Really. You think that. Wow.

1
3
Anonymous Coward

The problem is they are buying the phones

As much as Fandroids (as distinct from those who simply prefer Android) hate to hear it, the problem is precisely that Facebook were buying their employees the phone. They started out buying iPhones and found when Android took off, staff were already bought into the iOS ecosystem and were not switching to Android. With no cost constraint, iPhone was remaining the phone of choice for Facebook staff. That's not surprising, since it has the highest satisfaction ratings in the industry plus, as mentioned most of the staff had bought into the iOS ecosystem. Now it's "harming" their understanding of Android so they have a campaign to encourage more staff to get Android phones. Simple really, though you don't get the undistorted story from The Register who are applying their usual spin.

8
3
Facepalm

So if they told you to take off your Hublot Big Bang and wear a Patek Calatrava you would think that's OK?

Purlease.

0
1
Anonymous Coward

As far as I'm aware, FB isn't forcing anyone to change their personal phones - or even their work phones. From what I've read elsewhere it looks as if they're just encouraging use of Android stuff.

Your mistake was taking a Reg headline as being more than tangentially-related to the truth... :P

6
0
Silver badge
Stop

"Would you like your employer to dictate what car you drive"

That's pretty much what company cars do.

Granted, they're paid for, but it's not often that you get a choice about what to have!

2
1
Anonymous Coward

"Would you like your employer to dictate what car you drive"

Many do: No SUVs, no two-doors, no tinted windows, no petrol engines...

0
1
Silver badge
Facepalm

Yes may I just add....

...I wasn't referring to personal phones.

I was referring to whatever kit the company issues as standard.

You take what you are given and get on with it.

0
0
Silver badge

Individual...as in owning an iPhone like everyone else?

Me? I don't have a Windows/iOS or Android phone. Pre2, now that's individual.

0
0

"Many do: No SUVs, no two-doors, no tinted windows, no petrol engines..."

Some don't. My cousin had a 2 litre Renault Clio Sport Cup (with everything on it) as a company car because it was actually cheaper than what the company usually offers... and a LOT more fun for him.

0
1

they do dictate the car you drive

The automakers in Detroit give preferential parking to their own marques. Competing vehicles have to use way out lots. Even for visitors and contractors.

You work for a company trying to roll out a mobile interface, it would be beneficial to the company's bottom line and employee bonus plans to maximise the end user experience. Customer first. Otherwise your business model is faulty.

0
0
Bronze badge

Re: Employees have a duty to be competent

This could, you know, be a way for fb to show some metrics to investors, "Ooh, look...88% of our employees use the fb-based android phones, err, umm, android-based facebook phones. That translates into love and trust in the fb offerings..."

0
0
Trollface

People thinking they have the nerve to choose their own phone with their own money! The nerve of them!

1
0

Re: The problem is they are buying the phones

If they are buying the phones, I fail to see the problem. The relevant department simply contacts the employee with a date for their switch to a new mobile phone, in the same way as for desktops, notebooks, desks and any other piece of company equipment. All this has no bearing on any mobile phones that employees choose to buy for themselves.

0
0
Silver badge

Cost constrained

Coward @ 14:52

The customer satisfaction reports rate the satisfaction of owners of Galaxy Ace alongside owners of Galaxy SIII and The Iphone 4S. In other words, they are useless. It doesn't say anything about Samsung or Android that Galaxy Ace is less satisfying than Galaxy SIII, and it doesn't mean anything for Ios or Apple that Android phones are "less satisfying" than An Iphone.

I'm not cost constrained and I wouldn't choose an Iphone. I don't work for facebook though.

0
2
Anonymous Coward

Yes, but us webOS users (I have both a Pre2 as backup, and a Pre 3) are watching the browser slowly fade into irrelevance, which is annoying, and Open webOS won't be retrofitted. At some point the annoyance of this will exceed the pleasures of having an easy to use, efficient piece of equipment - but by then hopefully RIM will have got out its BB 10 phones.

By then, I hope that the EU Data Protection people will be stomping all over Facebook. With big, heavy boots.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: they do dictate the car you drive

Been there, had to hire an Oldsmobile to visit the plant. It just makes you go away thinking "Would I buy a car from a company as childish and immature as this?"

0
1

This post has been deleted by its author

Anonymous Coward

Re: they do dictate the car you drive

"It just makes you go away thinking "Would I buy a car from a company as childish and immature as this?""

On the other hand, if they -didn't- have that policy, the internet would be flooded with pictures of Hyundais parked outside Chevy offices, with 'FAIL' written on them in Impact. They're in kind of a no-win situation.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Cost constrained

@AC Most people have no analytical ability, which leads them to conduct customer satisfaction surveys badly or to repeat the results as if they were true.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Facebook should be platform independent

If it favours only android then we risk getting into the same mess that we are in with PC's and Windows where everything else (apart from OSX) has less than 1% of the market.

This would give them the widest reach of customers.

Unless the new paymasters at Facebook are demanding even more advertising popups.

Not that it matters to me, I don't use Faceblotch or Twatter.

Soon it will be cool NOT to use these things (sorta like not having a plethora of Tattoos covering ones body)

Ok, let the deluge of downvotes from Fandroids begin.

2
6
Mushroom

Re: Facebook should be platform independent

Have a down-vote.

Not from a fan-droid, but from someone who thinks your wildly out of date opinion of tattoos needs an update.

3
9
Silver badge

Re: Facebook should be platform independent

I thought he was being sarcastic. I, for example, saw some really poor tattoos on one of the losing NFS quarterbacks, on tv, yesterday. I think it was SF. I don't remember who he was, but it looked like he lost a fight with an old QMS printer cartridge.

0
0
Thumb Down

Re: Facebook should be platform independent

"...Not from a fan-droid, but from someone who thinks your wildly out of date opinion of tattoos needs an update..."

Au contraire I think his opinion of tattoos is completely up to date. Once a badge of non-conformity and rebellion, they're now just another bland must-have fashion accessory. My favourites are those laughably refered to as "tribal". There's nothing quite like having a splodge of random curves and semi-circles with points on the end permanently inked onto your body to mark you out as having absolutely no individuality or imagination whatsoever.

Oh wait.... you've got a "tribal" [snigger!], haven't you?

9
2
Stop

Re: Facebook should be platform independent

Nope, wouldn't be seen dead with a tribal tattoo - it doesn't mean anything to me. My Maori friends on the other hand, have a different view.

Given my tattoos aren't in any way on show, they hardly count as a fashion accessory either.

As far as i'm concerned tattoos are another form of art.

2
3
Silver badge

Re: Facebook should be platform independent

You seem to think that only a "fandroid" would downvote a comment along the lines of "serving other systems as well as Apple's is the opposite of platform independence". Did you read the article? It might have been helpful it the Reg had shown some of the posters put up in FB HQ. Instead of a picture of a Nazi telling the serfs to throw their iphones away or be terminated, they used a picture of an Android and information on how to upgrade from an iphone to Android. It's optional.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

To be honest an employer should be glad their employees are using something that will get the job done and not have to mess around with a complex device. More time for working then.

3
5
Silver badge

If they are supposed to be supporting a wide variety of devices, they need to be testing on the wide variety of devices.

So far the Facebook Android app always seemed to lag behind the iOS version, even though Android is the dominant mobile phone OS.

So they needed to do something to give their staff a kick up the behind to at least get them to more accurately reflect the real world user base.

It's not just FB. How often do you see "The hit app now available on Android!!!", answer, a lot. How often do you see "The hit app now available on iPhone!!!", answer not much. For whatever reason, iOS always seems to get the initial attention. It will be interesting to see if this changes if the ipads dominance of the tablet market is threatened.

Now if only the BBC could be given a similar kick... Their Android iplayer is horrendously low bitrate, and their news app doesn't even do basics like rotate, let alone take advantage of larger tablet real-estate.

1
0
Silver badge

@ Steve

Developers develop first for the platform that makes them more money. That is still iOS, even with Android selling far more devices now. iPhone/iPad owners are far more willing to pay money for an app, so a lot of 99 cent iOS apps are free w/ads Android apps. You can blame that on Apple owners being suckers, Android owners being cheap, or just an obvious outcome of the market - Apple devices exist only at the high end of the market, while Android devices cover the whole spectrum from low end to high end, and it seems reasonable that the lower price band of the market you buy in at, the less willing you probably are to pay extra for apps.

Given how crappy the iOS Facebook app is, if this is the one getting all the loving attention of the developers, I hate to think how awful the Android version is. It is much better than it was earlier this year before leaving behind HTML5, but it is always slow (quite annoyingly so at times) randomly decides to skip hours worth of updates for no reason, has a few glaring bugs that surely FB employees must run into on a daily basis, and plenty of missing functionality compared to the web site.

I always figured the reason the mobile app was such crap was because they wanted to make people use the web site where they make money from advertising. Now they've got some ads inline with the updates on the mobile app, so maybe they have decided to actually care about mobile now.

0
0
Silver badge

BBC News

Steve, you need to update your app! It does rotate, works well on tablets and even lets you play video now.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: BBC News

@DougS

I wonder how many of the iOS devs actually do make money. If they weren't already a Mac owner, they would have had to purchase one before they could even start developing. Not a good start to the bottom line!

The Android dev suite runs on anything, and costs nothing. Maybe this explains why a lot of apps are decidedly amateur.

@Craigness

Now that is odd. What version do you have? I've just checked on my vanilla Nexus 7, JB 4.2 and there is no update. BBC News Version 1.1 is what I have.

0
0

This post has been deleted by a moderator

Devil

Re: Android is THE platform to be compatible with

A recent news report said about 50% of facebook users in Australia were fed up with the bullshit and being hooked into the crap....

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/digital-life-news/its-complicated-why-our-facebook-romance-is-fading-20121122-29r06.html

Thirty-one per cent of Australian Facebook users feel that they spend too much time on the site. This number doubled to 61 per cent among those aged between 18 and 29.

Forty-three per cent of users have thought about closing their accounts, with slightly more - 47 per cent - of those aged between 18 and 29 admitting to considering disliking Facebook for good.

I have dealings with used car salesmen, and many of them are great people who are very savvy - very smart people. And most of them are not hopping around wetting themselves going, "Oh facebook - it's so wonderful."

The fact is that when presented with the fine points in the paperwork, and the total fucking bullshit of a scam fest this ADVERTISING COMPANY and it's management actually is - most facebook users are just plain too fucking stupid - and of the "Me Too" spineless variety of consumers.

As one fule lamented, "If I don't use facebook, then how do I get invited to parties?"

As much as I despise facebook and the people that run it, and their total dishonesty and lack of ethics - they are doing the work, that the idiots are consuming... and paying for in the process....

There seems to be a great parallel between making and earning, and using and paying.

Or smart with money and stupid without.

2
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Android is THE platform to be compatible with

Sadly, it's not "Linux" enough to be truly open. Another harm from the "do no harm" setup.

Let me tell you what you need to be compatible with: Open Standards. As a service provider it is fantastically stupid to isolate yourself from any platform, so keeping it open makes it easier to be cross compatible. That way it's less relevant what mobile platform you're dealing with, which also isolates you from the fanboi crap in either camp (which is, to me, the most irritating aspect of any discussion about any platform).

2
3
Anonymous Coward

Re: Android is THE platform to be compatible with

the total fucking bullshit of a scam fest

I would like to compliment you on probably the shortest, yet very eloquent and correct description of Facebook ever. Bravo.

4
1
Silver badge

oh4fs

The fool is the one who sends party invites only on facebook, not the one who acknowledges the issues this raises.

0
0

This post has been deleted by its author

Mushroom

It's a slow slide to oblivion

Maybe with this new push to actually use the POS apps they have been downdating*, they might just start to see why pretty much all the reviews on the facebook apps are slating them for not doing the basics you'd expect to be able to do, ie post a status and reply to other people's statuses.

Facebook are on the slippy slope down to oblivion, and the sooner the next great social network comes along the better everyone will be, until that goes the same way.

*downdating as updating implies that things have been fixed/actually work better than before the update.

3
1
Bronze badge

Supporting the real world.

Did Apple's crippling of the web forced Facebook to stick to IOS apps?

The success of Android open web model maybe caught Facebook cold footed.

0
4
Silver badge
Stop

Re: Supporting the real world.

You seem to have an odd definition of "Crippling" there. You mean "wouldn't let Flash on the iPhone" I assume. Other than that mobile Safari is a pretty good, standards compliant browser (and probably better off for its lack of flash)

2
1
Bronze badge

Re: Supporting the real world.

Facts about IOS's slow web browser got published by Blaze last year.

Don't worry, the abuse they got probably means they won't dare real benchmark again.

Whilst it is well known IOS web apps get stymied to funnel developers onto proprietary apps, publishing the the data is maybe a kamikaze act.

0
2
Silver badge
Stop

Re: Supporting the real world.

iOS benchmarks pretty well against competing mobile browsers. There's no evidence that Apple have in any way slowed it down (with the exception of browser windows embedded in apps, that get a slower JavaScript engine), but rather that the limit is the ARM hardware that it runs on.

1
1
Silver badge
Happy

"IDC numbers show how Android devices will comprehensively dominate the market by 2016"

Fanboys, and that sad excuse for a tech (copy) 'writer' Charles Arthur, will be holding wakes, crying in their beer and tearing their hair out.

Only three more years? Millions of people standing around with aged fondleslabs. Just how humiliating can that be?

0
2
Anonymous Coward

Possibily for the first time "dogfood" reflects the experience well.

3
0

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.