Apple has filed a brace of patents that, in part, describe methods to control printing and print settings by having the user physically interact with their iOS device by "shaking, flipping, rotating, spinning, moving laterally or to follow a shape, or combinations of these." In US Patent and Trademark Office applications …
It's one of infinite number of variations on "Shake to ..." where "..." is whatever functionality you wish to dream up.
The patentable technology is shake detection and notifications in software. What software does in response to a shake is not patentable, imho.
If a patent is issued for this then it's game over man. Game over.
Re: Game Over
Cyanogen and I believe the Galaxy S have had "turn over to answer" features in the past. Shake detection shouldn't even be patentable; you can't patent shaking something. The United States of Patents is getting absurd. What is wrong with copyrighting the implementation? Why does everything need a patent?
It's a good thing they've got PS3 controllers working with Android since getting into print settings looks funnily like how you'd control a driving based game.
There was an app in Andoird Marketplace called 'ShootMe' that used to take a screenshot of your mobile device when you shook it. I can't remember when 'Marketplace' switched over to 'Google Play' but I remember using ShootMe on a rooted HTC Wildfire/Buzz.
Re: Game Over
Even the "shake" detection would need to be very innovative and not just reading an off the shelf accelerometer.
Who is worse?
The idiots that file this stuff or the idiots that approve the patents.
I would love to see Apple use some tiny part of their cash mountain for R&D. I'm fairly sure their current 2% is including the army of Patent Scribes.
Re: Game Over
Tired, Frustrated, Irritable, Need a root, read story of idiot patent - Inspires GREAT idea.
I know - "Hammer on Screen" - I will patent that.
It's the "Fucking turn off now" function.
Re: Game Over
To prevent accidents it'll probably be combined with voice commands.
Expect a fanboi waving his iFruit in the air shouting "printodocumentus!" somewhere near you soon.
Re: Game Over
I never made the connection, but everytime I shake my 'gentleman' after urinating, the nearest printer to the bathroom prints out a test page.
I assume I owe Apple royalties, otherwise they will convince a Judge to take my penis off the market.
Re: Game Over
> Cyanogen and I believe the Galaxy S have had "turn over to answer" features in the past.
Maemo has always had a "turn over to stop the phone ringing" feature.
Re: Hammer on Screen
Plenty of prior art on that one I'm afraid. Dating back to old monochrome CRTs at least. For "turn off now", might I suggest the peeing on it gesture.
Apple Patent Disclosure Procedure
Select one item from column A, one item from column B...
Re: Apple Patent Disclosure Procedure
Sounds like it, though its a good method for making up quirky project names - see Ministry of Supply "Rainbow Codes" - it doesn't sound like a means to cover all eventualities.
If Apple thought this one good enough to apply for a patent, what fantastical ideas are in the reject pile?
Rather than shake, you ought to tilt the phone like a ball in a maze game. More fun.
Time to put a stop to it all by putting Green Cheese through the window of Apples patent department. (sorry another Rainbow Code reference)
....Samsung must be shaking in their boots!
WTF are they smokin' in Cupertino?
Re: Oh dear.....
Now when you shake your iPad, you put into silent, turn on the flashlight and print, all at the same time.
Oh, shake the phone...
I've had a few printers that had a setting set somewhere (I never managed to find it) that required this very action to be performed before printing would occur. I was about to inform them of prior art.
Mine's the one with a cocktail shaker in the pocket.
I used to have to pick my old Epson printer up and give it a shake in order to get the fecking thing to print anything.
It doesn't seem to me to be a great use of shake, now bringing up task manager that would be a great idea. Can't believe this is even patentable I mean how is it an innovation. I might patent Fart to unlock!
who is for shaking steve job's coffin
I will be patenting the idea of making a phone call by shaking Steve job's coffin, may be he has already patented
the idea of kicking the bucket
In the Future...
Everyone will look like they have some form of Tourette's Syndrome or Sydenham's Chorea (St Vitus Dance)
What about HP or a fax manufacturer
Imagine what they could do. You hit the printer or fax machine and it could delete the current print job, reset the printer, put it back on on-line mode, hang-up a call, etc. Good thing this wasn't used years ago or Office Space would never have been the classic it is.
...some moron is going to allow this nonsense a free rein on proceedings.
someone needs to stop this craziness.
reductio ad absurdum
Once shake to vibrate to shows up, all their devices will get stuck in one infinite loop until the battery is completely flat.
It's the codpiece with the iPhone in it.
If you drop into a toilet and it sinks it means that the printer is off-line or out of paper. Amazing!
Presumably the incidence of late night "accidental" printing of porn will skyrocket...
...you shake your Apple device, and it deletes your most recent text, shuffles your music, and prints the result?
Re: So, basically...
it'll be fine because iOS still doesnt multitask very well :)
dumb functionality and a dumb patent
Do the designers at apple actually use their product? Shake to shuffle stays switched off on my iPod. It shuffles when I don't want it to such as during audiobooks and doesn't respond to shaking when I do. Its a righteous pain. I'm probably holding it wrong. I can't see this functionality being any more useful.
Re: dumb functionality and a dumb patent
Quote: I'm probably holding it wrong.
Apple already used holding a device to do different stuff on iPhone. Lay iPhone on table to use networking, hold iPhone to disconnect from network.
Paris because she's disconnected.
I'm going to patent the idea of shaking a device voids the warranty.
I thought all actions invloving shaking of a screen were patented by the Ohio Art Company.
You know, the makers of the Etch A Sketch...
Re: I thought all actions involving shaking of a screen were patented by the Ohio Art Company.
The pocket version even has rounded corners.
I claim Prior Art on this one. Anyone remember Etch-A Sketch. Shake to Erase :)
Homosapians have been waving theirs hands around for over 60,000 years - and Apple are now patenting it?
Does your warranty cover
your having thrown the phone across a room (or just dropped) when it slipped out your hand whilst shaking it?
I can see it now, some poor sod down the shiney building begging for their idevice to be fixed as it "was because of your stupid way of sending prints".......
Imagine all those joggers with iThingies strapped to ...
their arms! What a scream, random prints all along their route.
My new Brother printer latches on to anything WiFi or Bluetooth (as well as Ethernet and USB) so I'll have to protect it from passing iThingies.
I saw an Apple owner shaking his thing, after he had dropped it, to see if there as anything loose inside. Whoops, there goes another print command!.
Just how dumb can these patent apps get?
Re: Imagine using your iPhone as a SatNav...
and you're driving down cobbled streets or hit a pothole...
The screen is obliterated with a pop-up message 'Error - can't find the printer!'
Oh, no... I forgot, we're using Apple Maps...
the message is more likely 'Error - can't find a bloody thing!'
It smacks of a company desperate to make their products stand out in a now very, very crowded market place.
They've 'won' (for now) a legal victory over Samsung but have likely had it dawn on them really quickly that it has done nothing to neuter the pace of handset release and development at their biggest rival, as they almost certainly intended it to do. As well as witness the resulting substantial moral backlash in the mainstream press. Both tech and non tech.
I'd wager that all but the hardcore 'buy anything Apple' consumer will approach their purchases of handsets and tablets with moral factors now part of the buying agenda. As an iPad user who was due a recent handset upgrade I can honestly say any serious consideration of the new iPhone went out the window because of this. I’m not alone in now feeling dubious about Apple I would imagine.
I know I'm just the singular and don't claim I know what everyone is thinking, but I'd bet good money that this recent patent application is Apple going down the gimmick route. Try and stand out in a crowded market place to get the attention of novelty whores when their competitors now bringing knives to the fight and not just their tech which has more than caught up with the march Apple stole on them all.
Personally I think 'innovations' like this will do nothing but devalue their brand even more than their recent behaviour as a corporation and the 'missed a classic opportunity to innovate again-what was all the fuss about' epic fail that iOS6 is.
re: substantial moral backlash in the mainstream press
I've not seen that. All I've seen is a load of "Apple win patent case over Samsung" articles. Those who look will find the evidence that Apple are likely to lose this case in the end, but for those reading the "mainstream press", in the UK at least, the trial is being portrayed as a massive victory for Apple.
Next Apple will patent fart to convert format.
It's the Mactini...
Reading this, I just couldn't help thinking of the 'Mactini' UI:
"shake iPhone in a horizontal motion, with a slight downward tilt to the end of the motion, in order to instruct a remote robotic arm to bring you the salt cellar."
"Tap iPhone against the printer in order to print the device on that document" - I thought it was a nice idea but flawed in two respects ... one that you want to waste the energy to go to the printer only after your document has had the chance to print and ... two ... the iPhone doesn't have NFC.
What next? - ElReg, can we have a "popcorn" icon please?
At least one actually useful dimension
If you can turn the device landscapewise to have print come out in landscape page orientation, and portraitwise for portrait orientation, then that's useful, particularly for stupid peosple using the device. But I don't know if it should be patented. And it was probably already done years ago on computer monitors with a landscape-portrait pivot. Including Macs.
If it's just random shaking, and not gestures in space, then what if you get hiccups?
too much shakin'
Shaking iPads suits fanbois. They are all wankers!
Damn, just sent the porn pic I was viewing to the office printer!
Does this mean we can't 'shake' our toner carts to get the last of the toner out of them?
The ground around 1 infinite loop needs to do some serious shaking to fix this....
Anyone got the shake to have a crap patent yet?
Obviously not spending a penny become quite sterling if you have eaten a bad apple.
And obviously the Andorid lot are the constipated bunch.
Time for the ....
when you shake the iDevice, the image get's longer and fatter, and if you carry on and speed up a bit, something else happens
you can customise with different skin tones, lengths, girths etc
sound effects optional
should be a hit with the ladies
Prior art on shake functions - Shake to Shut Up...
It may have been in bad taste, but does anyone remember the iPhone Baby Shaker application that Apple banned from the App Store a few years ago?
This Ole House
The prototype was developed when Jobs was still alive, and installed on his iPhone.
The project was being discussed at an Apple board meeting, and the phone was going around the table to let people try it out when Tim Cook turned up rather late. Curious as to why everyone was vigorously manipulating the phone he asked what on earth was going on.
To which one board member replied... 'I'm Shakin' Steven's'
I'll think what I want
I've observed this annoying journalist tic in articles by Americans (mainly because I have to) but I'd like to think standards in this country are higher and, besides, I can complain here:
".. that since some devices – think iPhones and iPads – have a relatively small display .."
Please, stop doing this RIGHT NOW before it gets out of hand.
Do you think Apple are ready for the rsi & tennis elbow law suits this might generate?
...really shouldn't be able to patent this kind of bollocks.