Feeds

back to article Democratic congresswomen 'less feminine in appearance' than Republicans

Time-rich psychologists in the USA say they have discovered that female Democratic politicians are significantly less feminine in appearance than Republican ones - so much so that it's often possible to tell which party a woman politico belongs to just by looking at her. Official pic of US Rep Michele Bachmann Michele Bachmann …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.

Page:

Bronze badge

Fits in with Republican Ideology

Everyone can be a millionaire (just try hard enough and forget for a moment that if everyone had a million in the bank it would be worth very little as a consequence)

Everyone can be Governer of California (just try hard enough)

Everyone can be pretty (just try hard enough)

10
3
TyD
Big Brother

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

I think it would be easy to detect party affiliation by an intelligence review of written non-partisan material. The candidates would write about a non-partisan subject like their family. When the material was graded, I would expect there would be a significant difference between groups based on party affiliation. I would anticipate that those who got elected based on how smart they are and not how pretty they are... I think you get the idea.

1
7
Bronze badge
Mushroom

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

Everyone knows there are only two type of Republicans - Rich ones and Stupid ones.

Both being characteristics commonly associated with hotter looking fluff...

14
8
Facepalm

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

Everyone knows there are only two type of Democrats - Liar ones and Freeloader ones.

Neither characteristic is commonly associated with good looks...

12
21
Bronze badge
Mushroom

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

You mean like all those hard working Americans that dont earn enough to pay taxes?

I see the Republicans have been working hard in Florida: http://www.theonion.com/articles/florida-to-experiment-with-new-600lever-voting-mac,29699/

Finally you have a president who has done something about your third world health care system - you have a health care system that costs twice as much as Canada's - but produces inferior results. For that alone (and not starting any wars) I hope he gets re-elected.

5
6
Bronze badge
Trollface

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

If Canada's health care system is so good, why did my Dentist move here?

2
3
WTF?

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

Did.. did you honestly just post a link to the onion as an argument?

Really?

On a tech web site?

Are you Iranian?

I hope you are trolling...

5
0
IT Angle

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

A venn diagram of the two groups would show considerable overlap.

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

I think he meant to post this link instead about how the Republicans managed to find many cases of voter fraud in the swing states:

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/09/29/3026835_p2/state-republicans-find-fraud-close.html

1
0

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

"If Canada's health care system is so good, why did my Dentist move here?"

Typically? Most medical professional's that move from Canada to America do so because their personal income can multiply by several times. It has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of care involved.

And for every story of a Canadian that goes south for some obscure treatment, you can find 100 Canadians that live in America but maintain dual citizenship so they can go back home for better quality for the non-rich, healthcare. Yes, you can argue that they do so because it's free, but the costs to go back north (transportation, mixed work, etc, etc.) tend to even that out.

7
1
Bronze badge
Mushroom

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

I expect he moved so that he can rip off gullible Americans with overpriced dentistry. They are after all used to paying rediculous amounts...

2
2
Bronze badge
Mushroom

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

I am well aware of what The Onion is. If you read the article it is pretty clear what I am getting at...

0
2
Silver badge

Re: Fits in with Republican Ideology

No, Republicans believe ANYone can be any of those things. It's Democrats who believe EVERYONE should be one of those things. It's an important distinction many under-educated and overly self-confident liberal opponents fail to make.

0
0
FAIL

Oh dear.

Thank you UCLA for wasting everybody's time on useless statistics.

6
4
Silver badge
Coat

Re: Oh dear.

What about the color of eyes, weight and length. Education, perhaps too difficult to measure.

1
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Oh dear.

"Thank you UCLA for wasting everybody's time on useless statistics"

May not be a waste of time for everybody. Munters now have evidence that they're not going anywhere in the GOP, and MILFS needn't waste their time with the Democrats. So there's two groups to whom this may be useful.

3
3
MJI
Silver badge

Group Of Pictures

What does it have to do with politics?

2
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Group Of Pictures

Are they some how implying that the democrat women are more manly so in effect if you want to vote for a female candidate then vote for a republican one?

Either way is sounds like they have too much time on their hands.

3
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Oh dear.

Lars --- What about... Education, perhaps too difficult to measure.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r=0

The Tea Party Republicans have been identified:

- wealthier than average Americans

- more highly educated than average Americans

The Tea Party Republicans seem to have a lot in common with average Americans:

- send students to public schools like average Americans

- support social security (instead of cutting it's payroll support, like Democrats did with the Stimulus law)

- support medicare (instead of cutting it, like Democrats did with the Health Care Reform law)

It is very strange, how the political parties which do the most horrible things in the United States, do so with the support of their political parties, when the political party constituents blame the other party for it. Uneducated bigotry is an amazing thing.

11
11
Anonymous Coward

Re: Group Of Pictures

Images like this float around the internet.

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0ByTGp3o4dldLTmFyN292NnhyaTA

In nations like the United States, they are a representative government... Americans elect people to represent them, represent someone to be their face in front of a camera, to be their voice in front of a microphone, to be their hand when writing a law.

To diminish the importance of any one of these things, in the political process, is a mistake.

2
0

Re: Oh dear.

It's reading that's at least good for a giggle. Education-wise, it's simply practice for Statistics and similar classes. The education is in doing the project and following paper, non necessarily in the specific subject matter.

0
0

Re: Oh dear.

"- support medicare (instead of cutting it, like Democrats did with the Health Care Reform law)"

More amazing how the Conservatives like to say this, but fail to mention that that money's associated COSTS to Medicare have also been moved over to general health care, leaving Medicare with no net change as a result.

Before: Medicare + Non-Medicare = Total Health Care Cost

After: (Medicare - Misc) + (Non-Medicare + Misc) = Total Health Care Cost

1
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Oh dear.

"more highly educated than average Americans"

You're talking about the same group that, for the most part, rejects evolution and the basic scientific model. This same group of people is so ignorant about fetal development, that they don't understand when a collection of cells develops enough to have a nervous system and yet want to make policies to restrict women rights. They've also managed to fabricate an American history centralized around their particular brand of religion.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!

3
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Group Of Pictures

"Images like this float around the internet....represent someone to be their face in front of a camera, to be their voice in front of a microphone, to be their hand when writing a law."

If the face is so important, why is one group represented by posed studio shots, and the other by candid shots, clearly selected to be unattractive?

You are a weird lot, and we are sadly aping you.

1
0
Silver badge

Re: Education, perhaps too difficult to measure.

No, it's because you can't even cherry pick the data to make Dems look good on that one. And while it would be easy enough to get past peer review, once it hits the stands it's subject to public revue and subsequent ridicule. Followed inevitably by pulling the paper for academic fraud, and loss of prestige for the journal.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: but fail to mention

Even the CBO admits the Republican plan scores the change more accurately.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Welcome to the USA

It is quite obvious - they investigated USA, not for example, Italian politics.

All of these are equally unattractive and look like something that has been specially selected to ensure that no sexual related scandal can ever take place.

Now that is what I would call a feminine politician:

http://www.google.com/search?q=Nicole+Minetti&hl=en&client=iceweasel-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&prmd=imvnsuo&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=0LZlUOyyCcLD0QXq2ICACw&ved=0CC4QsAQ&biw=1266&bih=568

Or on a bad day the PMILF (in her younger days): http://www.google.com/search?q=ukrainian+prime+minister&hl=en&client=iceweasel-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&prmd=imvnsu&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=eLdlUOzdG5Gr0AXh0oGIAQ&sqi=2&ved=0CB8QsAQ&biw=1266&bih=568

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: Welcome to the USA

Could be worse, Widdecombe or May come to mind!

2
1
MJI
Silver badge

Widdicombe or May

I'll give you Widdicombe

May is not too bad, better than Short or Waquie

Flint or Menche not bad at all.

1
0
Silver badge
Devil

True

"It may be unnecessary for Republican men to exhibit masculinity through their appearance,"

It's obvious they're dicks...

16
6

Re: True

"Dck" is actually the most popular first name in congress, statistically speaking. No, seriously.

7
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: True

Categorizing any group of people is bigoted.

2
3
Angel

Re: True

LOL!

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: True

"Only bigots categorize groups of people".

8
0
Silver badge

Re: Categorizing any group of people is bigoted

Typical comment from the stupid anonymous cowards on here.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

It could also be called

"The Stepford Wife" effect.

9
2
Silver badge
Pint

Botox v/s brains

Alternatively, retrophrenology may well help some.

beer for...well, it's weekend here. yay!!

1
0
MJI
Silver badge

That democrat woman

Looks like Spocks sister.

4
1
K
Bronze badge
Devil

Michele Bachmann...

MILF... that is all!

3
7
Anonymous Coward

Re: Michele Bachmann...

Maybe if it was required that she wore a ball gag to keep that intellectual dishonesty in. Personally, I'd set my standards higher.

7
5
Silver badge
Thumb Down

Re: Michele Bachmann...

Why do you think other people care about who you want to fuck? Why do you think any article that mentions women is an appropriate place to start telling people about who you want to fuck?

3
0
LPF
Devil

Re: Michele Bachmann...

Yeah I'd bet you like to use a ball gag on her.. deviant

0
0
IR

Nah

It's just that conservative women tend to fit into the stereotype that women must be caked in make-up and have big hair, whereas liberal women don't. You should also notice that half of the attacks on Democrat women by conservative talkshow hosts concentrate on their physical appearance rather than policies.

31
5
Anonymous Coward

Indeed, a more intelligent observation...

than any made in the El Reg article.

4
1
Anonymous Coward

Re: Nah

"You should also notice that half of the attacks on Democrat women by conservative talkshow hosts concentrate on their physical appearance rather than policies"

Actually, it is just the opposite. Remembering Sarah Palin discussion in the liberal media outlets was about how she looked, sounded, etc. while the more conservative media outlets tried to address the policies.

Even looking at a more recent liberal talk show, only the Conservative individual was providing facts & figures while the liberal talk show hosts insisted on talking about how they felt or what they heard.

http://nation.foxnews.com/ann-coulter/2012/09/27/ann-coulter-causes-mass-hysteria-view-whoopi-bleeped

8
13
Anonymous Coward

Re: Nah

When you quote Fox news, you've lost the discussion.

16
5
Silver badge
Paris Hilton

Re: Nah

"Actually, it is just the opposite. Remembering Sarah Palin discussion in the liberal media outlets was about how she looked,"

Really? I don't remember anyone talking about how she looks, it was mostly about how fucking stupid she was. Writing notes on her hand? What a reject.

6
1
Pirate

Bachmann more feminine?

With THOSE crazy-eyes? You've got to be joking. She's inane.

In keeping with the grand American tradition of dyadic political polarization, the "researchers" neglected to analyze faces from any of the other political parties in the land. Only Republicans & Democrats make the cut. Lame.

8
2
Silver badge

Re: Bachmann more feminine?

"Bachmann more feminine? With THOSE crazy-eyes?"

Are you suggesting it is OK to judge someone on their appearance?

"Only Republicans & Democrats make the cut."

They are the only two political parties that matter.

2
0
Bronze badge

They might be more pretty but they are not as intelligent... that's called the Bachmann effect too or maybe the Palin effect.

3
5

Page:

This topic is closed for new posts.