Feeds

back to article £CHING: ICANN bags $357m from 1,930 dot-word domains

Companies have rushed to file for top level domain names including .wang, .ketchup and .dog. A total of 1,930 applications for the new top level domains were filed, ICANN revealed yesterday as it published the list of applications. The name registry company will have scooped in $357m from the name sale, after charging $185,000 …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Silver badge
Gimp

Omission?

.milf

A money-spinner for sure.

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Unacceptable face of capitalism?

No chance some of these will be thrown out as too generic - not when cash is involved.

(.skin would be useful for a pr0n site.)

0
0
Bronze badge
Stop

Re: Unacceptable face of capitalism?

The whole thing is a scam. Why do we need these? Why not just allow multilingual equivalents of the current TLDs?

What's the chance Mr A. Non. Phisher has asked for ".corn"?

Madness. I can see no benefit to the Internet from any of this.

9
0
Bronze badge

Re: Unacceptable face of capitalism?

.corn went to a Mr G. Giant, I believe.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

ICANN = ISCAM?

er, thats it...

4
0
Thumb Up

"Meanwhile, Zodiac Leo Ltd has applied for .wang."

$185000 - That's Numberwang!

13
0
Anonymous Coward

Someone has 307 applications

That's quite a long list.

1
0
Facepalm

Juicy spam list

I was thinking what a nice juicy spam list that unfettered list of email addresses makes - if ICANN had some, I don't know, 'common-sense' then perhaps a little obfuscation would have been kind to those folks in the list who have some interesting emails to look forward to.

0
0

BBC

Is it true that the Beed have spent $185,000 of license-fee-payers' dosh for .bbc ?

0
0
Go

Re: BBC

Ridiculous! $187k is the application fee - but they've followed Industry Best Practice and used ¡Bong! Consulting for the application. So it'll be around £350k (+VAT)

2
0
Silver badge

Re: BBC

Well I know that is a lot of money and its completely insane, but to keep things in perspective, that's just one good HDTV studio camera with lens.

But still, throwing the equivalent value of a camera which would have otherwise been in service for 20 years out of the window simply is stupid.

0
0
Bronze badge
Pint

Re: BBC

Not neccesarily. The BBC recently killed off a lot of domains they own[ed] as a cash saving exersise. If they own .bbc they get to as many/anything.bbc all for one sigle price.

Now, I don't know if this will actually be a saving or not in terms of the cost of owning the gTLD compared to the myriad of other domains currently in use, but it ought to save the cost of at least one full time employee who only job is/was to keep track of renewals :-)

0
0
WTF?

.fail fail?

Somebody paid $185,000 applying for the chance to .fail? I... can't quite grasp the stupidity of the imagined brilliance...

1
0
Silver badge
Meh

Re: .fail fail?

I presume they'll be selling subdomains. If 18,500 businesses pay $10 for their name.fail to prevent anyone else using it to disparage their products, then the TLD will be turning a profit.

Wonder how much the'll ask for epic.fail?

0
0
Silver badge

So that's $185,000 * how many words in the dictionary? even before lawyer fees.

0
0
Facepalm

As somebody...

...who is the named contact for a GTLD application, I can confirm that within 24hrs of the 'unveiling' of applications, I am already suffering inbox meltdown from TLD-pseudo-spam. Many, many companies offering domain related services, consulting, etc. And requests for interviews on the submission.

I'd like to say "I ICANNot believe they put peoples emails addresses up for all and sundry to harvest". But, given the way the rest of the process is being handled, sadly, ICANN. *groan*

1
0
Silver badge

Re: As somebody...

You should have used a disposable Yahoo e-mail address for the application.

0
0
Silver badge
FAIL

Re: As somebody...

And then he'd have been turned down for not being big or professional enough to have a propper email adress.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: As somebody...

Ok... set up and use icannstuff@mydomain.com, filter everything to go to spam unless it's from icann.com (or whatever they use). This is the technique I use to get rid of 99.99% of spam sent to my 'mydomain' email addresses. I also use yahoo adresses and autoforward them to a collector address at my 'mydomain' email address, with similar filtering techniques.

2
0

Re: As somebody...

Yep,

I proposed we do just this - set up a specific gtld[at]large-corporate-entity.com email address. Apparently, that was a little too difficult to achieve.

Their actually publishing them is ridiculous, though - they'll either be real and therefore spammed, or a largely unmonitored account... which makes all their notifications about problems with submissions, changes in status, etc. lost to the electronic trash can. Ho hum.

Back to my archery practice... =/

0
0
Bronze badge
Pint

@frank ly

You're an ICANN kind of guy, Frank.

I liked the part about cybersquatting on Libya's ccTLD. Nice touch.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

glad to see all those email addresses

now to harvest them for the scammers

0
0
Holmes

Spot the squatters

There are less than six squatters there, at $185k a go someone is putting in a lot of money.

0
0
Bronze badge

"Google and Amazon are also fighting it out for .free and .book."

I was wondering if Facebook would go for .book so they could use face.book. Maybe they got .bitch instead.

0
0
Bronze badge
Facepalm

Free money.

The whole DNS industry is a free money printing machine.

And a Joke also.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Free money.

Well in a nutshell DNS is all about getting different entities to talk together. The only reason why company X can send E-mail to company Y is because there's DNS. The alternative would be lots of negotiations by lawyers... DNS is comparatively cheap. It's the lesser evil.

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Free money.

Except that these tlds are not about connectivity, they are about marketing. Which has a whole separate budget.

Bad luck for those who used random internal TLDs on the assumption that you'd never see them on the internet.

0
0
WTF?

wtf

Why would anyone register a tld after a product that may not even be around in 5 years time?!?!?

0
0
Happy

Re: wtf

.WTF good one!

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.