Electronic payments surging, but cheques not about to bounce Electronic payments are replacing the humble cheque, but not so fast that the descendants of the promisory note are irrelevant or should be hustled towards a hastened retirement. That’s the conclusion of the Australian Payments Clearing Association’s (APCA’s) new …
Loosed for words
for me, unless I want to drive 10KM's to get an internet connection.
Rural are that will never ever get broadband. The end.
Couldn't decide which wording to use for the subhead, eh?
The first sentence of that article looks like it was actually meant to be a strapline. Typo? (Well, or 'edito' I suppose would be more precise.)
In this country there is a far greater likelihood that Royal Mail charges will bring about the death of cheques faster than anything else.
Its OK to accept cheques, but ...
Why are there still businesses belonging firmly the 19th century that insist on cheque as the *only* possible method of remote payment?
Cheques are absolutely the most user-hostile payment method and should only be used by those over 75 that cannot get their head round other methods. And they should certainly not be involuntarily forced on people that are perfectly capable of using more convenient payment methods.
If you can accept cheques, then you can accept bank transfer and standing orders -- and can probably do it faster and cheaper than cheques.
Its high time that it became a legal requirement for businesses of all sizes to be able to accept bank transfer.
- Rogue Nokia splinter cell drops its Jolla phone A-BOMB
- Geek's Guide to Britain BT Tower is just a relic? Wrong: It relays 18,000hrs of telly daily
- Product Round-up Smartwatch face off: Pebble, MetaWatch and new hi-tech timepieces
- Review: Sony Xperia SP
- Geek's Guide to Britain The bunker at the end of the world - in Essex