Australia’s Federal Court has decided that personal video recorders in the cloud violate (PVRs) sporting groups’ copyright. The decision came in a case that saw Australia’s Rugby League sue telco Optus over its Tv Now service. TV Now allows subscribers to record television programs and then stream them to their mobile devices or …
You'd have thought
Something like TV Now would make a 'jolly good' service addon if bought by Foxtel....
Mind you, that would involve a large corp thinking about its customers as 'those who make its continued existence possible' instead of 'revenue stream'
"private and domestic use"
Sounds reasonable. These Optus people don't *sound* either private or domestic by my understanding of the word. In fact, although the article doesn't mention it, it have a sneaking suspicision we're talking about "business or commercial use".
It seems perfectly reasonable to me that "private and domestic" users might enjoy rights that businesses don't. It's one way in which the law can protect the little guy against big business. I'd really hate to see such rights eroded because someone abused them.
Re: "private and domestic use"
I don't think that it is that clear cut.
I mean if you set up your video to record a program, you aren't recording the program are you? Mr. Sony VCR on top of your telly is recording the program.
Is Mr. Sony VCR afforded the same rights as a person? If it is, what happens if you don't have room on top of your telly for Mr. Sony VCR? If it sits on a shelf instead, is that OK? What if the shelf is in another building?
Re: "private and domestic use"
This is what oAuth is for...
... "Do you authorize TVNow to record our shows on your behalf?"
While this might suck for the customers... I think the judges made the right call, the LAST thing we want in this country is judges ruling that corporations are "people" like they did in the U.S and have the same rights as individuals
Imagine if companies had voting rights... Shudder...
they would still buy a politician or two.
My understanding is that recording only happens if a real person requests it and is only accessible by the person who requests it. The whole sequence is "real person" controlled. Optus is just providing the hardware. Optus were not recording the programme and then saying, "Hey everyone, come around and watch the game with me for free."
It seems mad that Optus customers can't outsource PVR hardware provision because the league wanted to sell the viewing rights twice. Had they just sold the viewing rights once, this would not have been an issue. A phone is a computer. A digital TV is a computer. A PVR is a computer and a TV signal is just a (radio-wave) network. Online is not different from TV.
It seems Telstra just paid to make things awkward for everyone else. I'm somewhat irritated that my 3G connection costs will be higher because Telstra is trying to prevent Optus customers from using a rather efficient and cool system for something they are allowed to do. Given the intense Australian heat and rather unstable power, cloud PVRs make a lot of sense here. It's just like a Telstra T-Box moved to the other end of the WAN link. I suspect that it isn't just about the sports.
- Product round-up Too 4K-ing expensive? Five full HD laptops for work and play
- Review We have a winner! Fresh Linux Mint 17.1 – hands down the best
- Vid Antarctic ice THICKER than first feared – penguin-bot boffins
- 'Regin': The 'New Stuxnet' spook-grade SOFTWARE WEAPON described
- You stupid BRICK! PCs running Avast AV can't handle Windows fixes