Feeds

back to article Prehistoric monster snake crushed prey under 1.5 Brooklyn Bridges

The BBC's improbable measurement unit is on top form this week, in this report on a monster snake which terrorised the prehistoric South American jungle. The Titanoboa - a distant relative of the feared anaconda - weighed in at over a tonne and measured 14m (46ft) from snout to tail. In common with its venomless modern cousin, …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Bronze badge
Facepalm

so could this thing lift the Brooklyn Bridge?

they missed a trick - couldve had a bigger comparison:

I'd imagine the whole city of New York has a lower PSI footprint than that given that the rest of it isn't on stilts

0
0
Silver badge
Boffin

"so could this thing lift the Brooklyn Bridge?"

Yes, and so can you. If I give you a long enough and strong enough lever and a place to stand you can lift the world, as Archimedes would say (but then in Greek)

;-)

3
1
Happy

I think Archimedes would have probably mentioned needing a fulcrum which is what the whole lever principle revolves around (bad pun intended) rather than just prodding at it with a big stick...

2
0
Silver badge
Boffin

big stick theory

But there are those who still believe that Stonehenge and 'the pyramids' were mainy built by blokes tapping large lumps of rock with big sticks.

0
0

re: 'the pyramids'

And there are those who think "pyramids" and "volcanos" are just airports for lord Xenu.

1
0
Bronze badge

"the equivalent of lying under the weight of one-and-a-half times the Brooklyn Bridge".

This makes no sense at all. The units don't match. The weight of the Brooklyn Bridge is surely a unit measured in force whilst pressure is force per unit area. Of course it might be that the BBC is talking about the pressure at the base of the Brooklyn Bridge's suspension towers, but as it stands it is complete nonsense.

7
0

I think the implication is weight of the BB spread over surface area of you. Or a suitably chosen standard human.

0
0
Bronze badge

Not the weight of the Broooklyn Bridge divided by Body Surface Area...

"I think the implication is weight of the BB spread over surface area of you."

Well the Brooklyn Bridge is reported as weighting about 14,680 tons, or about 32.9 million pounds. As they report this as being equivalent to 1.5 Brooklyn Bridges, then that becomes about 49.3 million pounds. At 400 pounds per square inch, that comes out at 123,312 square inches. An average man has a BSA (body surface area) of about 1.9 sq metres, or 2,945 square inches. So that would be out by a factor of over forty to one.

Of course constrictors don't work over the entire body surface anyway.

In all, the BBC's numbers are bonkers and it's unclear how they were derived.

0
0
Thumb Down

Laaaazy!

That's sooo lazy having a fractional measurement when you get to pick your own units. They should have picked a bridge that gave them an integer number e.g. 2 Forth Rail Bridges would have been much nicer.

2
0
Happy

One mighty gulp...

More than a few people who'd happily eat Jennifer Lopez. And I'm sure they'd beat the snake to it. *cough*

6
0
Silver badge

Stupid comparison

Ground pressure is inversely proportional to the footprint of the object. To compare the constricting force exerted by a snake to the ground pressure of any object is plain stupid, especially if the footprint is not stated.

Just out of Wikipedia: ground pressure of ...

M1 Abrams tank: 15 psi

Mountain bicycle: 40 psi

Now imagine being crushed by a mountain bike.

3
0

Re: Stupid comparison

Shouldn't that be 10 mountain bikes ?

:)

2
0
Silver badge

Re: Stupid comparison

Now check out the stiletto heel figures.

4
0
Silver badge

Re: Stupid comparison

In his incomparable book "The New Science of Strong Materials", J.E. Gordon points out that women (in high heels) "weigh more than tanks". Of course he was talking about pressure, but chose those specific words to maximize the outrage.

1
0
Paris Hilton

Re: Stupid comparison

"Shouldn't that be 10 mountain bikes?"

Of course it would have to be 10 mountain bikes stacked on top of one another, so as not to increase the footprint in contact with you :)

Paris, because I bet she's had 10 stacked up on her

0
0
FAIL

Have they done the Math?

Now please feel free to point out any elementary mistakes I made but my back of an envelope calculations don't come anywhere near to theirs.

to work out the equivalent weight lying on top of you to give a pressure of 400lbs per sq inch:

Area of person lying down: assume 72 inches (6ft) tall and 30 inches wide and approximating that a person lying down is a uniform rectangle gives total area of 2160 sq inches. Multiply by 400lbs gives 864000 lbs or 391904 Kg or about 392 tons. Weight of Brooklyn bridge is approx 14,680 tons so it actually equated to 0.0267 Brooklyn Bridges.

Have I made some fundamental mistake or are they just making shit up?

0
0
Silver badge

Re: Have they done the Math?

Maybe they're accounting for the fact that anyone laying under the Brooklyn bridge will be much taller and wider (and somewhat thinner) within a fraction of a second?

2
0
Coat

Re: Have they done the Math(s)?

Your elementary mistake was in the title!

3
0
Silver badge

Re: Have they done the Math?

"Have I made some fundamental mistake or are they just making shit up?"

No, I think the writer was just demonstrating his inexponentiacy.

0
0
Bronze badge

I bet the Discovery channel

are really getting the horn over this, There's a good 2 years of programming here.

Titanoboa!

Secret Nazi Titanoboas

UFO Titanoboas - The Evidence

3
0
Happy

Re: I bet the Discovery channel

For a second, I thought you meant the Syfy channel. Maybe a collaboration is in order?

0
0
Anonymous Coward

> 400lbs per sq inch - the equivalent of lying under the weight of one-and-a-half times the Brooklyn Bridge

That's 2.67 MPa and 0.27 Tower bridges respectively SI fans.

0
0
Silver badge

What's that in UK creme eggs?

2
0
Anonymous Coward

> What's that in UK creme eggs?

2,939,278,400.

Note the 'UK creme egg' unit refers to the amount of sugar (25g) in the confection rather than the whole egg (39g). If you want it in actual UK creme eggs then the figure is 2,449,398,667.

This is 9.7 (or 8.2 for the full egg) years worth of creme egg production at current rates.

3
0
(Written by Reg staff) Silver badge

Yes, but it's the Brooklyn Bridge, so surely this should be in US Creme Eggs?

1
0
Anonymous Coward

> so surely this should be in US Creme Eggs

I was translating to metric, but fair enough.

That's 2,161,234,118 34g US creme eggs, which incidentally is 75.6 Olympic swimming pools or 1.9 Albert Halls.

BTW; I cocked up on the UK creme eggs conversion, it should be 1,884,152,821 39g UK creme eggs representing 6.2 years production.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Now they've done it

I fear they may have already inspired some producer to start work on yet another "improbable monster/alien invader/extreme weather attacks New York" movie. Sigh.

1
0
Joke

Re: Now they've done it

Everyone attacks New York. That's what it's there for.*

*With apologies to Spike Milligan.

2
0
Gold badge
Coat

Re: Now they've done it

Eight out of ten monsters (that expressed a preference) said that they'd far rather attack Tokyo.

4
0

Re: Now they've done it

Except Tokyo is already beset with earthquakes, tsunamis, B-29 bombers, the Hello Kitty fad, and nuclear power plant meltdowns, so Al Qaeda and Donald Trump notwithstanding, there's less competition in NYC.

0
0

Re: Now they've done it

Hello Kitty (who has no mouth, mind you) destroyer of worlds. I do have to give the Japanese credit where credit is due: After being bombed, burned, nuked, washed away, as well as the point of origin of some of the wierdest shit the world has ever seen, they are tough and will probably out live us all.

0
0

London Eyes?

Ok, hook taken ...

1 Brooklyn bridge=14,680 tonnes

1 London Eye=2100 tonnes

So the equivalent is 6.99 London Eyes ...

or, according to the "88 Trillion Facts You Never Wanted to Know About the Bleedin' Wheely Thing" web site, that's the equivalent of 1272 london cabs per wheeely thing ... that's 8891 London cab's worth ... I assume it's an unloaded FX4 so I haven't allowed for "blimey gov, I'm such a fat cabbie I've lost the steering wheel" or "sorry me' old china, you and your tribe are such huge geezers you'll barely fit through the door and might put me overweight"

1
0

Means nothing to me...I only understand things in terms of Blue Whales

1
0
Gold badge
Coat

<Whale>

GROAN, BOOM, WHINE, DRONE, SQUEAK.

</Whale>

There, does that make sense now?

2
0

The BBC's improbable measurement unit

Shouldn't that be "The BBC's improbable measurement unit unit"?

2
0
Thumb Up

Re: The BBC's improbable measurement unit

In the department of measurements?

0
0

Do constrictors really crush their prey, or just stop it breathing in?

Anyway, I'm still stuck on the bit about Jennifer Lopez and swallowing.

1
0

Constrictors kill by squeezing with sufficient force that the pressure in the thoracic cavity is larger than the heart muscle can overcome, basically inducing cardiac arrest. (I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true.)

I might have missed something, but is Jennifer Lopez starring in Titanoboa vs. Megashark?

0
0

wtf

what the conversion for weight in funbags? Now I'm all confused.

0
0
Boffin

Re: funbags

Because funbags are suceptable to the vageries of improbability physics (eg: you think you're going to get hold of one or more but don't allways manage it for some reason) a definative measurement using this unit will not be posibble till the El Reg research team can define the elusive BSH (British Standard Handful) constant.

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.