Apple has announced that it will begin issuing a per-share dividend of $2.65 per quarter, and will also initiate a share buy-back program. Together, these efforts will reduce Cupertino's cash hoard by about $45bn in the next three years. Speaking of Apple's cash, CEO Tim Cook said in a conference call on Monday morning that "Our …
Had to happen
Once St Jobs had proved that you can't take it with you...
Like Apple shareholders really need an extra $10 a year profit on every share. It would have been much more interesting if they had funded a Steve Jobs foundation with a mission to make the world better somehow. Think Bill Gates...
But that was Bill Gates' own money, not Microsoft's.
I suspect Microsoft's (and Apple's) many shareholders would not be pleased if their companies decided to send >30% of their cash to a foundation.
I wonder how the shareholders would feel if they spent 20% of it to give everybody in the world clean water and basic sanitation?
Even at Foxconn?
"a Steve Jobs foundation with a mission to make the world"
You mean Apple
$10 a year from a $500 stock, that seems to be a 2% yield.
Is that really that good?
2.6% isn't bad at all. It's better than a savings account or an ISA
Not really - the best cash ISAs currently available (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/best-cash-isa) are 3.5% - tax free. 2.6% after tax would be significantly less.
Better than savings or ISA?
Not sure where you're getting your ISA rates from, but 3% is a good rule of thumb, higher if you shop around. The 2.6% return on shares would be subject to tax, too.
Re: Better than savings or ISA?
Cash ISAs are limited to £5340...
You can get tax-free dividends if you put the stocks into a Stocks & Shares ISA with the same limit.
You can combine both types and get double the tax-free allowance.
I expect the yield will go down as the stock buy back will up the price of the stock which would lower the yield.
I'm beginning to think they are just trying to see how high they can drive the stock price. If that's the case they have a long way to go to reach BRK.A
It looks like Steve's influence is on the wane already, someone who understands how to run a business is actually in charge. By which I mean someone who understands a business, rather than someone who understands design and marketing.
Next you know they will be actually contributing to charity.
Steve Jobs knew how to run a business, he saved apple from the brink and it became hugely profitable.
You might like this way better than when Steve Jobs was in charge, but to imply he couldn't run a business is simply wrong. No matter what side of the fence you're on
Hahah right, because Steve Jobs clearly showed he didn't know how to run a business, taking stock from $6 to almost $600 in the years he was back in charge of Apple.
You sir win the most clueless award - or maybe just biggest troll.
Foolish yoof! Of course the influence of Jobs is on the wane: any time you die, the phone calls do tend to taper off...
Btw (since you seem to have slept through the first decade of the current millenium): Mr. Cook and company parachuted into a silo of money made possible, to a significant extent, by the business acumen and design-focus of one Steve Jobs. Just sayin'.
Why is $10.60 p.a. dividend a high payout on a $600 share?
It's not, I can get 1.50 on 25USD stocks all day. That said, stock value and divedends are not normally tightly coupled.
What this signals is that apple is moveing out of the rapid growth phase that started when Jobs reaquired the helm into a long-term sustaining phase. This is fairly normal when a company has saturated it's core-markets (music players, tablets, and premium smart phones in the case of APPL).
no-one buys apple shares for dividends
Since they've never had them. They just buy them in the hope that the eternal upward spiral continues. A little dividend is just a bonus to them. So how long before Apple returns to $6 a share as it surely will one day. Nothing lasts for ever......
I'd have been more interested in a shareholder discount, similar to what BA did before it borged with Iberia to become IAG, and M&S do (for example)
Issuing a dividend and doing a buyback
Doing this now avoids a class action suit from shareholders. That could explain the 'token' amounts
If you had a shed load of shares ..
.. like, say, Tim Cook, wouldn't you like a little income from them rather than be forced to sell to get cash? A 1.7% return may not be much, but it's infinitely (literally? I'm crap at sums) better than 0%.
Of course, everyone here will remember that Microsoft started going tits up almost immediately after they started issue divis - almost like the divi was a way to pre-emptively prop up some shares you knew were about to tank ..
Kinda like a company that just had to bribe it's exec team $10 billion to work out their 2 year contracts ..
Re: If you had a shed load of shares ..
MSFT announced a dividend in 2003, that's AFTER the massive stock drop from it's near $60 peak in 2000 to around $30, approximately where it still remains.
APPL is completely different.
"Our first and foremost objective, as it will always be, will be to make the most innovative products in the world. And so we decided how much cash that we needed to do that."
Great! When do they plan on starting?
Insanely Doomed: Why Apple Will Crash Without Steve Jobs
Take a look at this book on Kindle by Paul Turner.....
- Vid Antarctic ice THICKER than first feared – penguin-bot boffins
- Antique Code Show World of Warcraft then and now: From Orcs and Humans to Warlords of Draenor
- iPhone sales set to PLUMMET: Bleak times ahead for Apple
- Regin: The super-spyware the security industry has been silent about
- Review Amazon Fire Phone: What's MISSING... and why it WON'T set the world alight