On the plus side...
Maybe if they win, we'll see a move away from crappy Web apps to slightly less-crappy native apps, instead of the cram-everything-through-http, screw-sane-UIs thing we have now.
...but I still hope they lose, because this is ridiculous.
"Slightly less crappy"
I like your sense of humor!
I hope they win.
It is necessary that these ludicrous patents start to hurt the tech incumbants as well as come to public prominence so that pressure can builds for the system as a whole to get the massive overhaul that it so desperately requires.
I hope they win too
Just before next years US Football Super Bowl.
Imagine the screams when all those web enabled TV's go blank 30 minutes before kick off.
So, did Eolas actually come up with this idea themselves in 1998? With actual example code? Or did they just buy in the patent from someone else?
Meanwhile... do BT still own the patent for the Hyperlink? Or has that been sold on yet? That patent should pay for a whole new broadband infrastructure for the UK.
Last thought... if Eolas win this case, I assume this is only relevant to the USA. So Web Apps get banned in the US and the rest of the world carries on as normal.
Hopefully this case just brings up how stupid and selfish the whole patent system has become.
It is one thing to own an idea or IP. It is entirely a different matter to get paid for it when it is used.
Even if BT owned it - and they may - how would/could they possibly enforce royalty payments.
You're absolutely right though, in its current form the patent law system offers protection only to those big enough to win or with a backer who has sufficient funds and you have a risk assessed case.
Err okay USA, please put down the patents, you can't be trusted to behave responsibly with them. The rest of the world should just sign an agreement to ignore crazy US patents, it worked out for the US oh so long ago.
There I fixed it
it worked out for China oh so long ago
For half the Far East now, for the USA right up until the balance of profit changed. Just read Dickens and others about the iniquity of USA citizens making millions out of non-American writing and inventions and refusing to pay up on grounds of "freedom of expression" among others, or just straight plagiarism and theft - thus was USA technological greatness built.
The article seems to imply
That the EDT courtroom is selling favourable rulings in exchange for businesses investing in the state, that surely can't be the case can it?
Maybe it's time for mandatory round-robin or random allocation of courts to cases where applicant and defendant don't agree? Or at least to "neutral" courts selected by neither? It works for referees in sports matches...
No it's not the courts
It's the politicians writing laws in exchange for businesses investing in the state.
Living proof that the early settlers liked to fuck buffalo.
“Contrary to what Defendants may believe, many businesses choose to relocate to Texas and to Tyler, Texas each year for reasons that are unrelated to venue. Eolas points out the tax benefits it receives in Texas, and additionally, many people find that Tyler is a wonderful place to live and work."
Congratulations, you just overloaded my bullshit detector. I can't picture him saying this as anything other than a cheesy movie villain who's pretending to play nice while he waits to unveil his grand plan for world domination.
Actually my take on that was slightly different.
I felt that he had just demonstrated that he was totally unfit to hear the case. If his response to an appeal with regard to the location of the trial is based in part on his feelings of what we can call "local nationalism" I cannot see how he is a fit person to rule on this case. Given that he openly gives decisions based on criteria other than the law. Some "judge", hmm?
Well I thought that Mugabe's bought-and-paid-for judges were the most bent in the world.
Thank you Texas for proving me wrong.
"University of California (part owner of Eolas)"
Then the University of California should be bloody ashamed of itself.
"many businesses choose to relocate to Texas and to Tyler, Texas each year for reasons that are unrelated to venue."
Such as the ease of landing their flying pigs at the local airport.
The more I hear about the southern states...
The more I don't want to visit them, neither business nor pleasure. There's not a chance they'll ever receive any of my investment money or tourrarism dollars if I have any say in the matter.
Is that sorta like combining terrorism with tourism? Maybe that's what Leigh Van Bryan had in mind.
Welcome to Tyler, home to the world’s largest rose garden, and to the world's largest patent trolls.
Well of course
Everything is bigger in Texas
patent for ajax and plugins
wait, did they invent iframes and ActiveX as well? Because ActiveX were interactive applications... capable of using embedded information, and iframes are still used instead of ajax sometimes.
I distinctly remember using both technologies before 1997.
But Eolas' was filed in 1994..
Filing date: Oct 17, 1994 by Original Assignee: The Regents of the University of California
The concept of "plugins" has been around since (at least) 1991.
Photoshop introduced them in its v2.0 release. It is very clearly an "obvious" feature for other software, including web browsers. Plugins were all the rage at the time.
The term "hypermedia document" could easily include any multimedia application of the day, including those early interactive CD-ROMs. Projects like the BBC's own "Domesday Book" (using Laserdisc technology) in the mid-80s may also include enough examples to prove prior art.
Apple's own "HyperCard" (and variants) also predates the WWW by some years and allowed execution of other applications through "Externals" (a synonym for "plugin"). Hypercard was released in 1987, so there's definitely prior art there.
That's been around since the Win3.x era. Would it count?
Win 3.x? Loadable shared libraries date back to PDP-11 days.
"The practical impact of withholding unrestricted access to the patented technology from use by the Web community will be to substantially impair the usability of the Web for hundreds of millions of individuals in the United States and around the world."
Around the world? Which two shits are we supposed to give about the US' latest patent balls-up?
Because companies often do with may countries,
they will often go for the 'lowest common denominator' approach because making a US version and a Rest Of The World version is a bit too expensive. Thus we all suffer from software patents, because many potential vendors and coders must abide by them.
Judge is a liar or an idiot - you decide.
"many businesses choose to relocate to Texas and to Tyler, Texas each year for reasons that are unrelated to venue"
No, they don't.
Someone should support him
I am really concerned about Sir Lee since these are the things which an academic like him should never live. I mean being dragged to some little Texas town/ village whatever for some liar troll who accomplished nothing in their life.
The Wired report and the comments below it about the town atmosphere really alerted me. Says he was shaken etc.
Mr. Lee isn't rms or esr, these guys are really used to the scumbag industry tactics. Even Ballmer is a better person to stand at that Court but not a idealist like Lee.
Readers might find listening to the "This American Life" episode "When Patents Attack" <http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/441/when-patents-attack>. Among the other revelations, Tyler, TX is the home of a large office building just down the street from the courthouse, which contains a huge number of empty offices belonging to patent trolls, just so they can claim presence.
The rose garden is an interesting touch, because otherwise the only industry in Tyler is patent lawsuits. It is a tiny town which, unbelievably, has a Federal Court. This is far from normal...
Nothing abnormal about it.
It happens to be the county seat, county seats are good candidates for US District Courts, and most 'Merkins prefer government toadies to be as far away from them as possible.
As for it being the only industry in Tyler, given a population of 109,000+ and that none of their top 10 employers are law firms or lobbyists, you must be thinking of some other Tyler, Texas.
I'm not normally a fan of Wiki, but this is actually the sort of thing they are decent at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler,_Texas
- Does Apple's iOS 7 make you physically SICK? Try swallowing version 7.1
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- Pics Indestructible Death Stars blow up planets with glowing KILL RAY
- Hands on Satisfy my scroll: El Reg gets claws on Windows 8.1 spring update
- Video Snowden: You can't trust SPOOKS with your DATA