An email that arrived in the inboxes of an unspecified number of Virgin Media customers on Friday that promised "faster broadband, for less" was embarrassingly pulled by the telco just hours later. The company had initially sent a message boasting about Virgin Media "tickles", which apparently the ISP gives to "people we know …
HTML vs plain text
I know what really happened. I use Claws Mail, which displays the plain text version of e-mails by default. I actually saw the correct message as it was only the HTML version that was wrong. I didn't realise anything was amiss until they sent the apology.
> We'll also be lowering the price of your broadband package in April to match the price of our 50Mb Broadband XXL packages.
And other packages in proportion? No chance. Vermin Media's policy (iunherited from NTL) of screwing their bottom-rate customers with the biggest price increases (or the absence of drops, or in one case with NTL, an increase when the top rate dropped), still applies.
The speeds of other packages will apparently be doubled. Mine is supposed to be going from 30mbps to 60mbps, even through I only get 20mbps.
The 20Mbs service is obsolete - it's the old mid-level package running on the older DOCSIS 2 modem... If you're "upgraded"* to the new superhub you'd be on the 30Mbs package for the same price (they actually reduced my monthly bill slightly when I upgraded as a "loyalty reward" since I've been with them since they were Blueyonder).
So the upgrade to 60Mbs will apply when, 1) they've upgraded your line and 2) you've upgraded to the DOCSIS 3 superhub.
* yes, yes - some might not see it as an upgrade - though it has improved recently and even supports "modem" mode so you can use your own, better wireless router.
How does that work if you're on a 10Mbs connection? They wont upgrade you to an obsolete package will they?!
"So the upgrade to 60Mbs will apply when, 1) they've upgraded your line and 2) you've upgraded to the DOCSIS 3 superhub."
From what I read of the offer then they'll upgrade you to the superhub for free as part of this change. I've never moved up to 30Mb from 20Mbs as initially, I think, you needed to pay something like £75 for the superhub .... I think that's come down to £30 "activation" fee now. Plus, the initial reports of the Superhub were not particularily positive and it originally could not be used purely as a modem so I gave it a pass as I've already got my router/firewall etc set up and just want a modem feed into it. Since then I gather you can now configure the superhub to act just as a modem so that will suit me fine when they come to upgrade me.
N.b. another reason not to upgrade originally was it seemed obvious at some point VM would want to turn off the DOCSIS2 and switch everyone to DOCSIS3 so looked inevitable that at somepoint they'd have to do free upgrades and, to be honest, 20Mb seems perfectly adequate for our needs so allure of 30Mbs wasn't great
The margins on the lowest tier products are pretty thin, so cost rises will always get passed on. The top packages have a large profit margin so there's quite a lot of room to cut prices in order to appeal to more customers.
I moved house last year and VM gave me a 'Super' hub, presumably as that was all they have in the warehouse these days. Soon after they offered the 20-30mbs upgrade for £30 but, as it seemed to me to be a 30 quid fee for somebody in network control to tick a box on a screen, I chose not to take them up on it.
I checked my download speeds a couple of days ago and it had magically gone up to 30mbs. Not sure when it happened but it could have been weeks ago.
"it's the old mid-level package running on the older DOCSIS 2 modem".
Actually I'm on DOCSIS 3 with a Superhub. They silently put me over onto it months back and my connection went down for a week. After an engineer visit he said somehow I was put onto DOCSIS 3 despite still getting 20mbps. After switching to a Superhub it worked fine, but I'm still only getting 30mbps.
Sorry, that should be "still only getting 20mbps".
10 will go to 30
I got a copy of this email and I was pretty annoyed at receiving it, especially as I can't bloody well get Virgin where I live. I'm stuck with my mate in a city sending me screenshots of the up/down speeds every now and again just to piss me off :)
At least it isn't available where your live, my neighbours declined the cable wayleave, so I can see the duct but cannot be connected to it!
Don't worry, I can send you some screen-shots of my VM broadband speeds just to cheer you up ;)
Go mental at them and escalate as far as possible, back when they were Blueyonder my mate discovered the road behind his house (which has no houses on it) had cable, but BY wouldn't put in the extra few feet under the pavement to reach his back garden. He kept writing letters etc until he got high enough that a site visit was arranged and the necessary changes made.
Here's a thought Virgin...
...instead of telling me about future improvements, why not make some attampt to deliver the service I'm already paying for eh? I don't get a quarter of the bandwidth you say I should right now.
I honestly don't get how the ASA allows this nonesense really. If Heinz started shipping tins of beans that were half empty there'd be a fuss sure enough.
Or if Walkers started shipping bags of crisps that were half empty...
the ratio of air to crisps in walkers crisps is set to a level that the bag of air offers some level of cushioning while being packed in boxes for transit..
have you ever noticed that walkers crisps on the whole have very few broken crisps and crumbs in the package compared to other brands?
if in doubt, get some digital scales and weigh the content of the packet. if there are any packets significantly under weight in relation to the stated weight of the package.. return them...
I haven't compared brands on this issue, no.
I was taking the piss.
RE: air bags....
I find that seconds after opening a bag of Walkers (or Lays) salt & vinegar crisps, the weight starts falling very rapidly. You may have to make the measurement very quickly :) Perhaps I should return them all ?
Well, they made a bit of a mistake, they spotted it and said "oops" within a couple of hours. Let he who has never accidentally emailed the wrong person cast the first flame, etc. etc. ?
Adam T: I agree!
I presently have VM 10m - consitantly measues about 13ms ping and 9.7M+.
And I understand they are goint o double that for me.
I was somwhat bemused by the email suggesting I already had 100M but so what?
Won't exactly be loosing any sleep over this!
Quite. I got the mail, it said something like "you're already getting our top speed", so I automatically assumed someone had sent the mail to the wrong distribution list rather than they were going to give me free stuff. Then shortly afterwards I got the other mail confirming it.
Not exactly earth-shattering, no.
Not only, but also...
They didn't just do this once, they did it twice!
We received the first email, then the retraction, then a second copy of the email, which was also followed by a retraction.
Dropping a bollock once is embarrassing, dropping the same one again having just apologised for it takes it to a whole new level...
Still, in the grand scale of things, I don't mind - I don't get comedy emails very often. :-)
I got it twice as well ... but check the email "To:" addresses ... one set was direct to my "blueyonder.co.uk" address and the second to the email contact address I set up on my account which use my own domain name but is forwarded into my "blueyonder.co.uk" address. Hence they sent it to two distinct addresses which happen to end up in the same mail box.
N.b. like someone else I spotted the "as you are already on the fastest package" line in the erroneous mailing I too immediately assumed they'd made a simple error. I also got at almost the same time another email saying that my current 20Mbs service would be increasing to 60Mbs.
I know a few people, me included, who have suffered service issues with VM each time a refund was given within 2 weeks of complaining coupled with repeatedly not being charged until the service was fixed.
Instead of e-mailing the CEO try customer services.
For me, customer services simply cannot help. My 50Mb service degrades to roughly under 30Kbps downstream and 3-5Mb upstream. Every time I call, they insist on sending an engineer and each time the engineer places an attenuator on the line, which fixes the problem for about a week then it starts failing again.
There are currently three -6DB attenuators in-line on my cable, apparently I am "too close" to my green box; which I feel is absolute bollocks.
I end up spending more money on phone calls to customer services which the £10 or £15 refund barely covers.
Pay for calls????
Of course if you had VM phone as well, you could just dial 150.........
No broadband provider is perfect, but since they became VM (previously NTL), their customer service seems to have improved quite a lot. AND my "10Mbps" is often around that mark.
Good news for some, as long as they lift the fair usage policy that sees 75% of your bandwidth removed once you've downloaded a fair bit.
One of the (many) reasons I moved to Sky. I don't get the full 20Mb I pay for with Sky, I currently get between 16-18Mb/s but at least it's that speed all the time regardless of how much streaming, gaming etc that I do.
They are doubling the values on the fair usage policy.
And if you read it you will see they manage traffic to imroove things like video streaming which I support.
As to those with speed issues I was downoding at the full 50 meg last night for over ana hour no problem so its only the unlucky few who have issues.
And I'm sure Rupert is pleased to take your money/
Fair use - nonsense!
@Big_Ted: "They are doubling the values on the fair usage policy."
We have been getting only a tiny fraction of the performance expected from our Virgin Media connection. When I called to report a fault, they said we exceeded the fair use policy on our "unlimited" account. After wading through several levels of the site hierarchy, I finally discovered that 'fair use' meant we could use our connection for about 15 minutes during the day, or 3 minutes each when divided across our household.
So doubling that, I will be able to use it for 6 minutes before I'm branded a data hog. I wonder why they are allowed to use the term "unlimited" to advertise this rubbish?
" I wonder why they are allowed to use the term "unlimited" to advertise this rubbish?" -- I believe the Advertising Standards Agency is incapable of correctly operating and interpreting a Dictionary.
Mistake or P.R stunt?
When V Media sent me this message it was quite obvious that it was nothing more than a P.R. stunt as it's not the first such cock-up they've made. Unfortunately a number of dim-witted tech publications have written about it and "tickled" V Media by promoting their new 120MB fibre optic service for free...
Yup, I got this e-mail, even though I don't actually have VM broadband (just telly)... Personally I just read it as another marketing droid cockup and shrugged.
I paid £25 pcm for the 512kbps service when I first moved home over 10 years ago. Since then, VM have moved me to 1MB, 2MB and now 10MB "FOC", at the same price.
I saw this email (actually I first saw it on their forums) and saw I'd go to 20MB, but the 20MB/30MB packages would go to 60MB.....so I made a phone call...
For the fairly low sum of an additional £2.50 pcm I could move to 20MB, and thus get 60MB when the upgrade hit. I was then told I could get the 30MB service for the same price, and then I got an additional sweetener of a £5 discount for 3 months. So, I'll save £2.50 a month for 3 months, which will then pay for another 3 months of the increase - so technically I'm getting 30MB free for 6 months, by which time I should be on 60MB.
So far the "actual" 30 meg has been a bit sporadic (I've seen 27, but more normally around 10 meg) - but the main upside is that if/when my connection is throttled, it's down to 10 meg, not 2 or 3 meg. So, overall, I'm happy....and will be happier once I see more conistency.
In their favour, my 10 meg line has nearly always been 8.75 meg or above for a good coupla years... :)
30MB is the same price level as 20Mb ... in fact 20Mb is "obsolete" and only exists for people (like me) who were at the 20Mb and declined to have a "free" update to 30Mb which (still) requires "buying" a superhub (originally for £75 but now, I think, just £30 "activation"). As you were upgrading from 10Mb then you jump direct to the 30Mb level and get a free superhub as part of the upgrade. Its the usual Telewest/VM story of new/upgrade users getting something that long standing existing users cannot get. At least it appears with the 20/30Mbs->60Mbs I'll get a free superhub as I assume they are wanting to free up all the bandwidth allocated to DOCSIS2.
You get a free superhub if your old modem should (perchance) break...
"Some 50Mb/s customers will see an initial rise to 100Mb/s before moving up to the full whack 120Mb/s, the telco spokespersons added."
I wonder if iPlayer will still hang and need to buffer constantly?
Having had the 50 meg service for over 6 months now, whilst originally it was zippy and gave me close to 50 meg most of the time i was happy.
Having previously had a 10 meg package which commonly would be rate limited less than 2 meg and made for lots of hair pulling i upgraded to the 50 meg where i was informed i would no longer be subject to rate limiting.
Now 6 months on and oh look get to 7pm and the network is that congested i get no where near the 50 meg i should be getting until everyone goes to bed in the uk, testing even now in the middle of the day im getting around 30 meg on various testing sites :(
So i was completely bemused to hear they will be doubling everyone speeds, as the network cant cope with the load as it is.... its going to be really fun when they double everyone up and give the bandwidth bashers out their even more power to saturate the network to the face palm point.
I like Virgin Media
Ever since I took an arrow to the knee and had to spend more time at home, Virgin has been good to me.
Ever since I took an arrow to the knee I have been a virgin, or something like that.
yep my bro's on virgin .. never gets more than 5mb (for £20+)but no phone line so can't move ...
i'll stick with be* cause there fantastic ..
Quality vs Quantity
I really wish they'd drop this race for headline-grabbing speed figures for a bit and sort out the parts of the network that are just not up to scratch.
A significant portion of their customers aren't getting the speeds they're promised (just look at the comments above), I'm thankful that I'm not in that boat, but it doesn't stop there. Almost everyone (a lot wont' notice) is getting massive latency spikes throughout the day but particularly at peak times - mostly it's only people using their connection for VoIP and gaming that are complaining, and being ignored of course - it is VM after all.
It would be nice to see news of "Virgin Media to improve network capacity and latency in congested areas" but that's a bit of a mouthful, and doesn't let them plaster big numbers on the sides of buses.
Any VM customers out there, start running ThinkBroadband's ping tool - you'll get some nice brightly coloured graphs. Then show them to the support staff and get a "hmmm, sucks to be you" response.
Don't all jump to BT Infinity at once though guys!
Well I can't wait
My BB experience from Virgin has been pretty damn good over the years - sure, it fails some times, but in most occasions it is up an running again before the day is out. Jumping up to 60meg from 20meg is going to be a god send - when throttling kicks in I will still be pootling along at pretty close to my previous max speed, top stuff.
As for the email, yeah, got both, my thought was it was more PR than error (someone else mentions this above) - but meh, who cares - so long as they actually do the upgrades all's good IMO!
- Review Is it an iPad? Is it a MacBook Air? No, it's a Surface Pro 3
- Game Theory The agony and ecstasy of SteamOS: WHERE ARE MY GAMES?
- Hello, police, El Reg here. Are we a bunch of terrorists now?
- Worstall on Wednesday Wall Street woes: Oh noes, tech titans aren't using bankers
- Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media