I see a plotline for NCIS coming up...
Labcoat for Abby
The US Navy's newest and mightiest nuclear aircraft carrier, the USS George H W Bush*, has been plagued by continual failures in its lavatories, according to reports. Sailors have been forced into increasingly desperate measures to relieve themselves. Nov 11, 2011: USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) transits the Arabian Gulf in …
I see a plotline for NCIS coming up...
Labcoat for Abby
the toilets suck.
What I don't get is the deliberate introduction of single points of failure on a fucking warship.
Banks of bogs serviced by centralised vacuum systems? That is a guaranteed disaster, no matter how massively over engineered.
Vacuum should always be generated as close to the point of need as possible.
Look on the bright side, at least they don't blow.
A really piss-poor piece of engineering; the engineers did a crap job and are probably not flushed with success right now.
I think that the problem is paradoxically that the toilets don't suck.
Clearly they need a Dyson. No loss of suction, no matter how many tampax you flush.
...of doing exactly that if the piston returns before the bowl has completely cleared.
So when it's working, the toilets suck. And when they don't suck, they're not working. A bit like Microsoft products then.
Maintenance of the CHT (collection, holding, and trasnfer - i.e. sewage) lines and system traditionally belong to the Damage Control Division, headed up by the Damage Control Assistant (DCA). The lines require more-or-less constant attention in rotation - start at one end of the hull and work to the other, then start all over. I've seen what happens when the process isn't followed correctly, and it's *NASTY.* It's the job of the DCA make sure his sailors know what they're doing, and actually do the job right, as well.
Fire his butt.
When you read this line:
"Naval commanders blamed the problems on inappropriate objects such as clothes or feminine hygiene products being flushed down the heads."
FFS. If such an excuse is believable (and I'm dubious), then the seamen and seawomen should be told over and OVER again that flushing clothes and tampons is not the thing to do. It's bloody common sense, but since most people lack common sense, they need to be told - preferably by angry chief petty officers shouting in their face. Or maybe they should have sanitary bins next to the female toilets, like they do in civvie world.
Myself, I'm suspecting the episode is the fault of the US Military-Industrial complex. Some company's been given a no-bid contract to provide the toilets to the George Bush because the firm's CEO play golf with a couple of Senators, and there's no clause that prevents the company getting their money just because the loos aren't up to scratch.
"FFS. If such an excuse is believable (and I'm dubious),
then the seamen and seawomen should be told over and OVER again
that flushing clothes and tampons is not the thing to do."
Vessel deployment imminent.
Reluctant to depart swabbie, rinses & releases t-shirt.
Line blockage or macerator damage.
Repeat as required.
Regular occurence in UK RN.
Carrier design is a mature technology, so I strongly doubt some "no bid contract" deliberately made this mistake. The Nimitiz Class (including the Bush, named after the senior Bush, a carrier aviator in WWII) are built by Northrop Grumman, a regular contractor for multiple ships, and one of the few capable of building something of this magnitude.
Since the design is of a proven historical status, I concur with a prior poster that the Damage Control Officer is likely not managing his department and taskings properly.
Before ranting about a subject, a few minutes of google would at least give you a starting point to not being foolish.
and clearly you were never in the U.S. Navy.
Fire the Training Officer?
"Not tossing inappropriate items down the shitter" is something that is taught young sailors LONG before they ever see anything that floats. Maintenance of that 'Basic' instruction does not belong to the Training Officer (technically, that's the XO, though the job is delgated far down teh chain and to many individuls) but rather to the various Chiefs and Leading Petty Officers whom are responsible for discipline and management of their sailors.
So, yeah, there's apparently a discipline problem on board, too. But mostly, I'd blame the Damage Control Division - If you do the job right, the lines stay reasonably clear no matter *what* goes down them, and if you do it wrong, even once, you can (literally) stuff up the whole system for days. Or even better, if it's an older vessel, you can cause a CHT line to rupture - under pressure.
I've seen the results that last item. Nasty beyond the power of words to relate.
Clearly, this George Bush is full of it, too.
It's full of shit.
423 dunnies for 5,000 people? That about 1 for every 12 crew, or 2 hours per day each. Even if they are reserved for different genders and ranks (mustn't see the officers with their trousers down!) that's still a great deal of porcelain.
One can only assume that the designers needed that amount of redundancy in the system to cope for "emergencies" (aircraft-carrier landings can be scary events) and the reported breakdowns. I wonder if the weapons systems, for all their extra complexity, are any more reliable?
1 for every 12 isn't much. Standard UK domestic guidelines are 1 for every 6 (i.e. 7 people = 2 toilets).
"Standard UK domestic guidelines..."
Do not apply. It's a warship, not an office park or residential development.
Like its name sake, full of crap an doesnt work too well
yes yes, i know its not named after the Dim one, but still....:)
Plant a couple of dozen female mateots on board in 'off-games week', and their combined tampons in the heads can scupper a warship!
(Aptly named ship, in this case...)
Whoever did the plumbing must have (not) been taking the piss.
...or in this case it doesn't ;)
Ice-Cream van on the deck?
... another of the Hot Shots films ;-)
RIP Lloyd Bridges
No, it's not.
Now, where's my empty bottle....
.. another Bush being a pain in the a** .. if amusing
.. be war crimes next ..
The headline would be better without "US nuclear aircraft carrier"
Nah, I think it should say "US nuculer aircraft courier"
A ship full of s*** - just like its namesake :)
...they're pissed off and well and truly in the shit, then?
AC because I don't want the USN dumping all over me for taking the piss ;-)
Good thing it's not the USS Clinton...
Or its sister ship, the USS Monica L.
That's also full of seamen.
This must be the first time that Bush (Senior) wasn't taking the piss.
"The more they overtake the plumbing, the easier it is to stop-up the drain." (ST III; TSFS)
Rather literally, in this instance, it seems...
One again, it shows that George Bush wasn't good for shit !!!
A ship full of sh....
This is in keeping with GW's style of Texas BS!
Sorry, that's all I've got......
Another unintended, but fitting application of the Sherlock icon!! No shit indeed, my good man!
George Bush is backed up backed up with Shit and full of sea men.
I can do subheadings, me.
they stuck their backsides over the poop deck and got on with it, there was no 3 ply toilet roll, they ate weevil infested biscuits, rotting salt beef, got scurvy, drank grog, climbed the rigging without a health and safety assessment, fought at every opportunity. They were real men.
Not like the namby-pamby lot of today who need their pepsi, aircon, risk assess having a shave and eat peaches and cream for afters.
Not just Nelsonsonian times! A grand relative served on one of the Insect class gunboats during WW2 in the Med, and told me they had two "heads" - effectively canvas-covered frames over a plank - hanging over the stern, and that for a crew of over fifty!
To the poop deck then...
Pity the poor A-gangers that are having to deal with those outages...
Imagine holding it in for that long: "When they've stopped chasing us and we can get the toilet technicians aboard, then you can go!"
... that isn't quite right in the head.
No Working Head, just as the carrier's name sake, and progeny.