The newsfeeds of numerous Facebook users have become flooded with filth – specifically violent and pornographic images – as the result of an attack against the social network over the last day or so. Objectionable content such as photoshopped images of celebrities such as Justin Bieber in sexual situations, violent pictures and …
Erm. Where's *my* filth then?
Typical. No filth for me.
Reason to go back to Facebook?
Been using Google+ and it's superb, but all this porn might make me log back into FackFuck again.
And the difference is . . .?
Is this outpouring so different from the aesthetic quality of the typical Facebook page anyway? Is there really a reason to complain?
I saw some of this, allegedly posted fy a friend. He had signed up for nothing on FB, had granted no apps access to his account.
I reckon something in a browser is accessing the fog of cookies farcebuk leaves around.
This is just another instance of users clicking on unfamiliar links without thinking twice about it. No further access has to be granted to any application, or any service signed up for.
Apparently it's an issue of users pasting js code in the browser address bar, which is worse yet.
What happened to the wonderful real-time content checking?
Like it says - what happened? Whilst you can't legislate for the stupidity of Facebook users, surely the security vendor has to answer a question or two about the "real-time" content engine.......
Justin Bieber in sexual situations and depictions of an abused dog
Hopefully not in the same picture.
Or are they the same picture just described in two ways...?
Just a typo
"Objectionable content such as photoshopped images of celebrities such as Justin Bieber in sexual situations"
Should read "Objectionable content such as images of Justin Bieber"
Users pasted links into the browser address bar...
...of an out of date browser.
The malware then installed itself when the browser visited the dodgy page, and once the user was logged into facebook the posting begins. This is the initial vector of transmission anyway. Details are hard to come by on this one. Lot of noise though.
If this had not used shocking images, would facebook have reacted so quickly? They are still relying on end users to flag content, but one article I read the end users were so busy commenting.
- +Comment Anti-Facebook Ello: Here's why we're still in beta. SPAMGASM!
- NASA rover Curiosity drills HOLE in MARS 'GOLF COURSE'
- WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
- Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9
- George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests